The golden rule, which suggests that you should treat others as you would like to be treated, should be followed. You should respect other people's property.
You should respect other people's property and follow the golden rule, which states that you should treat others as you would like to be treated. This means that you should be mindful of other people's belongings and treat them with the same care and consideration that you would want for your own belongings. By following the golden rule, you can foster positive relationships with others and create a sense of mutual respect and understanding.
Learn more about
https://brainly.com/question/30164087
#SPJ11
You should respect other people's property and follow the principle of treating others as you would like to be treated , also known as the golden rule.
Be considerate: Always think about how your actions may impact others, especially when it comes to their belongings or personal space. Be cautious and handle their property with care. Ask permission: If you want to use or borrow someone else's property, make sure to ask for their permission first. It's essential to respect their right to decline your request.
Communicate openly: If you accidentally damage someone's property, take responsibility for your actions and communicate with the owner about the situation. Offer solutions or compensation to rectify the problem. Encourage mutual respect: Be a role model for others by treating everyone's property with care and respect. Encourage those around you to do the same.
Be mindful of cultural differences: Different cultures may have different perspectives on personal property and boundaries. Be aware of these differences and adapt your behavior accordingly.
By adhering to the Golden Rule, you can foster positive relationships, show respect for other people's property, and create a more considerate and harmonious community. Remember, treating others as you would like to be treated is a powerful guideline for building trust and understanding in any social setting.
For more such questions on property visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20914771
#SPJ11
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
State court
Court of Public Opinion
Federal Court
Answer:
It would be heard in a Federal Court.
Cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a Federal Court.
I hope this helped at all.In 2009 one person died every blank minutes from impaired driving in the United States
Answer:
Every 48 minutes
Explanation:
Texas law contains various Penalty Groups that determine the severity of criminal sanctions for possession,
manufacture, and delivery of controlled substances.
O True
O False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
They have different penalty groups for different substances.
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.
Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.
Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.
In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.
Know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33013975
#SPJ8
Which resources are most important to north africa?
Answer:
Africa's two most profitable mineral resources are gold and diamonds
Explanation:
sorry for the late answer. best of luck! <33
Who determines the search type? (crime scene) Forensic science!
Answer:
Crime scene investigators.
Explanation:
Forensic examination is a type of forensic examination that examines traces of evidence left by people and things to solve identification (which particular person or specific object left traces), diagnostic (establishing the safety or state of objects that created traces) or situational (establishing the conditions for the formation of traces) tasks within a crime investigation, with the ultimate objective of determining who, how and when commited the crime under investigation.
Ewan is a nonresident of California and holds a partnership interest in a California partnership. He received a Schedule K-1 from the California partnership that included net income of $10,000 from California sources. What amount of the distributive share of partnership net income is taxable by California?
Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
Which president signed the Community Mental Health Centers Act in order to
deinstitutionalize the mentally ill?
Answer:
Signed into law by President John F. Kennedy on October 31, 1963, the Act was the first of several federal policy changes that helped spark a major transformation of the public mental health system by shifting resources away from large institutions towards community-based mental health treatment programs
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Scholars have suggested several ways of better controlling organized crime than were discussed in the unit. If you were given the task of controlling organized crime, what would you choose to do ? Why do you think this would reduce organized crime ?
Answer:
The best ways to control organized crime :
1. The center link where such groups are being controlled from should be attacked .
2. Special forces for special crimes should be trained and maintained.
3. Special laws should be passed against such crimes for punishment and also for investigation purposes.
4. Strict actions from forces should be taken at first.
5. General public should be made aware of popular faces so that people can help the authorities also.
Which form of alcohol was consumed at epidemic levels (causing major health and social issues) in English cities in the early to mid 1700s?
Answer:
Gin.
Explanation:
Gin Craze is a term for the sharp rise in alcoholism in England in the first half of the 18th century, when domestic entrepreneurs immediately threw themselves into the production of this brandy from available raw materials, such as grain and juniper, and flooded the country with cheap gin, where hard alcohol was a luxury item until then and people were used to drinking mainly beer.
As consequence, mass drunkenness erupted, especially in the slums of London, which led to an increase in crime and widespread demoralization. In 1743, it was recorded that the average Englishman consumed ten liters of gin a year. A number of scandals led to the British Parliament passing a series of so-called gin laws between 1729 and 1751, which banned the tapping of spirits without an official concession and significantly taxed gin production. Consumption therefore fell sharply, and the definitive end of Gin Craze marked the years 1757–1760, when the use of grain to produce alcohol was banned due to a large crop failure.
is it illegal to record a conversation without the other person knowing
20. The difference between law and regulation is that A. regulation is created by Congress B. regulation isn't created by Congress C. law is created by a non-government agency D. Iaw is associated with penalties
The difference between law and regulation is that regulation isn't created by Congress. So the correct option is B.
Laws, also known as statutes, are created by legislative bodies such as Congress. They are the formal rules enacted by a government that apply to individuals and entities within a jurisdiction. Laws are established through the legislative process and carry the force of the government's authority. They address fundamental legal principles, rights, obligations, and prohibitions.
On the other hand, regulations are created by administrative agencies or executive branches of government. They are derived from the authority granted to these agencies by the laws passed by Congress or other legislative bodies. Regulations provide specific details, guidelines, and procedures for implementing and enforcing the laws. They are more focused and specific than laws and often deal with technical or operational aspects within a specific domain or industry.
While laws are associated with penalties for non-compliance, the option D ("law is associated with penalties") does not capture the complete difference between law and regulation, as regulations can also be associated with penalties for non-compliance. Therefore, option D alone does not sufficiently differentiate between law and regulation.
To know more about obligations.
https://brainly.com/question/32907342
#SPJ11
In which century did the western roman empire came to a fall
Answer:
The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476, and the Western imperial court in Ravenna was formally dissolved by Justinian in 554. The Eastern imperial court survived until 1453.
Explanation:
The Western Roman Empire comprises the western provinces of the Roman Empire at any time during which they were administered by a separate independent Imperial court; in particular, this term is used in historiography to describe the period from 286 to 476, where there were separate coequal courts dividing the governance of the empire in the Western and the Eastern provinces, with a distinct imperial succession in the separate courts.
A rule of law enabling a defendant to win even if all of plaintiff's allegations are true is a(n) _____. Select one: a. counterclaim b. affirmative defense c. deposition d. judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Answer:
d .
Explanation:
d.judgment not withstanding the verdict
A certiorari pool describes the
a.method used to appoint the chief justice.
b.nickname for the water fountain in the courtyard of the Supreme Court building.
c.computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court selects its cases each year.
d.practice by which Supreme Court law clerks work together to evaluate each petition.
Certiorari pool refers to the computerized lottery system by which the Supreme Court of the United States selects the cases it will hear each year. Therefore the correct option is option C.
The certiorari pool is made up of legal clerks from each of the justices who screen the thousands of petitions filed each term and recommend which matters should be heard by the Court. The use of the certiorari pool has been criticised for lowering the number of cases heard by the Court and limiting the variety of problems presented for consideration.
The certiorari pool is a procedure utilised by the United States Supreme Court to help manage the huge number of certiorari petitions (requests for the Court to review a lower court decision) that are filed each year.
For such more question on Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Why is it difficult for a bill to become a law?
A: There are not many ideas being sent to the lawmakers.
B: The committees do not get their work completed in time for approval.
C: The president vetoes most bills that are sent for approval.
D: The process includes a system of checks and balances by both executive and
legislative
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Our system has checks and balances between the branches of Government. These checks and balances maintain distributed power but they can make bills becoming laws a much more difficult process.
Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If QuikBilt fails to meet this standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to
Options are:
A. establish, as a matter of principle, that QuikBilt acted wrongfully.
B. Pure with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.
C. Pure with funds for its loss of the bargain.
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Answer:
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Explanation:
Punitive Damages, often used in a law of tort, when the jury considered the acts of the tortfeasor or defendant to be either intentional, malicious, fraudulent, or violent in nature, and it is designed to do the following:
1. punish a defendant or tortfeasor and
2. discourage further such acts by the defendant or tortfeasor and others.
Therefore, in this case, if QuikBilt fails to meet the agreed standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts. Because such acts is deemed malicious, fraudulent and intentional.
As citizens, we have both freedoms and which of the following?
a) Responsibilities
b) Regulations
c) Debates
d) Voices
Define and discuss contractual theory (of a seller’s
duties), and duty to comply.
Contractual theory defines and establishes the seller's duties in a contractual relationship with the buyer. These duties include delivering goods, ensuring conformity, transferring title, and complying with legal and industry standards.
Under contractual theory, a seller has certain duties that arise from the contractual agreement with the buyer. These duties typically include:
Duty to Deliver Goods: The seller has a duty to deliver the goods to the buyer as specified in the contract. This duty includes ensuring that the goods are delivered in the agreed quantity, quality, and within the specified timeframe.Duty of Conformity: The seller has a duty to provide goods that conform to the specifications and requirements outlined in the contract. The goods must meet any agreed-upon standards, be free from defects, and be fit for the intended purpose.Duty to Transfer Title: The seller has a duty to transfer ownership or title of the goods to the buyer. This typically involves transferring legal ownership, providing appropriate documentation, and ensuring that the buyer obtains lawful possession of the goods.Duty to Comply: The duty to comply refers to the seller's obligation to adhere to applicable laws, regulations, and industry standards in relation to the sale of goods. This duty ensures that the seller operates within the legal framework and maintains ethical business practices.To know more about Contractual theory
brainly.com/question/32396011
#SPJ11
Who is responsible for writing the transcripts of the proceedings in the courtroom? O bailiff O court reporter O general counsel O law clerk
post full test if you have please
Explain the statement, "If we didn't
have government, we'd invent it" and
support your explanation with
evidence.
E=mc cubed, true or false?
Answer: false
Explanation:
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I think but I'm not sure
the courts will find an implied contract when group of answer choices justice demands it. conduct of the parties indicates they intended an agreement. there is promissory estoppel. there is undue influence.
The courts will find an implied contract when the conduct of the parties indicates they intended an agreement.
An implied contract is a legally binding obligation arising from the actions, conduct or circumstances of one or more parties. It has the same legal effect as an express contract, which is a contract entered into voluntarily and agreed orally or in writing by two or more parties.
Both explicit and de facto implied contracts require mutual consent and disagreement. However, an express contract is evidenced by an actual agreement (written or oral) and an implied contract is evidenced by the circumstances and conduct of the parties.
Learn more about implied contract https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Scenario: You just joined the FBI as a Jr. Forensic Accountant. You are assigned the " Goldsmith Worldwide Investment " case. FB is investigating if this company is involved in a Ponzi scheme.
(A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. Ponzi schemes are named after Charles Ponzi. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors a 50% return within a few months for what he claimed was an investment in international mail coupons.)
The subject company, Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, has been advertising a high-yield investment opportunity; investing in gold mines in Argentina. Several of the investors have filed complaints with the FBI, each reporting that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments promises 35% annual return on investments but has failed to deliver. You subpoena the Bank the Goldsmith is associated with. You consolidated all files and information received from the bank and start to apply IMPACT model you learned from Queens College's "Data Analytics for Accountant " to put the puzzle together and present the case to the Head of Department.
Objectives:
Goal - Apply IMPACT Model and all tools and techniques learned from the Spring 2022 - Data Analytics for Accountants to solve the FBI case. All questions need to be answered carefully with qualitative and quantitative support.
A. Identify Question - 1pt
What are the three questions needed to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case?
B. Master Data - 1pt
You have created the consolidated worksheet - see " 6628" tab.
What are the three + data tables you need in order to put this " 6628" consolidated worksheet together? what are the primary key and secondary key to connect them?
C. Perform Analysis – 7 pts - Please indicate technique used and show your work.
Just like the PWC case, you will choose techniques to help you identify issues and draw your conclusions.
1. Determine the total investors funds received. -1pt
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median and Mode ? -2 pts
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines. -1 pt.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. - 2 pt
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. -1pt
D. Communication - 1pt
6. What are your conclusions?
Answer & Explanation:
A. Identify Question:
1. Are the promised returns of 35% annual on investments unrealistic or unusually high?
2. Is the company primarily paying existing investors with funds from new investors?
3. Is there evidence of misrepresentation or false advertising regarding the investment opportunity?
B. Master Data:
To put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together, the following data tables are needed:
1. Investors Table:
- Primary Key: Investor ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional identifying information like name or contact details can be used)
2. Investment Transactions Table:
- Primary Key: Transaction ID
- Secondary Key: Investor ID (foreign key)
3. Company Revenue Table:
- Primary Key: Revenue ID
- Secondary Key: None (if available, additional information like revenue source or period can be used)
C. Perform Analysis:
1. Determine the total investors' funds received.
Technique: Summarizing
- Sum the values in the "Investment Amount" column of the Investment Transactions Table.
2. Determine total dividends paid to the investors. How many investors received dividends? Who received the most amount? What are the Mean, Median, and Mode?
Technique: Statistical Analysis
- Filter the Investment Transactions Table for dividend payments.
- Sum the dividend amounts to calculate the total dividends paid.
- Count the unique investors who received dividends.
- Identify the investor(s) with the highest dividend amount.
- Calculate the mean, median, and mode of dividend amounts.
3. Identify Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.
Technique: Filtering and Summarizing
- Filter the Company Revenue Table for revenue related to the Argentinian gold mines.
- Sum the revenue amounts to determine the total business revenue.
4. Depict the in/out flows trend.
Technique: Data Visualization (e.g., line chart or bar chart)
- Create a visual representation of the investment inflows and outflows over time.
- Plot the investment amounts (inflows) and dividend amounts (outflows) on the chart.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure.
Technique: Examination and Documentation
- Review the consolidated worksheet and identify any suspicious assets or transactions that may be subject to seizure.
D. Communication:
6. Conclusions:
Based on the analysis using the IMPACT model and the techniques mentioned above, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- The total investors' funds received can be determined by summing the investment amounts.
- Total dividends paid can be calculated, along with information on the number of investors receiving dividends, the investor(s) receiving the highest amount, and statistical measures such as mean, median, and mode.
- Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines can be identified by filtering and summing the relevant revenue amounts.
- The trend of investment inflows and outflows can be depicted using data visualization techniques.
- Potential assets for seizure can be identified by examining suspicious transactions and documentation.
Overall, the analysis will provide insights into the financial activities of Goldsmith Worldwide Investment, helping to determine if there are indications of a Ponzi scheme.
A. Identify QuestionThere are three questions that can help to determine if this might be a Ponzi Scheme case:
Does the investment opportunity promise unusually high returns?
Are early investors paid returns using the investments of new investors?
Is there a lack of clarity regarding how the returns will be generated or what the investment is used for?
B. Master DataThe three data tables needed in order to put the "6628" consolidated worksheet together are: Goldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestorsGoldsmith Worldwide Investments InvestmentGoldsmith Worldwide Investments PaymentThe primary key to connect them is the Investor ID and the secondary key is the Investment ID.
C. Perform Analysis1. Determine the total investors' funds received.Total investors' funds received = $12,785,0002. Determine total dividends paid to the investors, the number of investors who received dividends, who received the most amount, and what the Mean, Median and Mode are.Total dividends paid to the investors = $0The number of investors who received dividends = 0No one received the most amount.Mean = N/0Median = N/A, as there were no dividends.Mode = N/A, as there were no dividends.
3. Identify business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines.Business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines = $12,000,000
4. Depict the in/out flows trend. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has more cash inflows than outflows in every quarter.
5. Identify assets for potential seizure. Potential assets for seizure include: Land and buildings Investment portfolio Cash
D. Communication Based on the analysis, it can be concluded that Goldsmith Worldwide Investments is operating a Ponzi scheme. The company has promised unusually high returns to investors but has failed to deliver. There are no dividends paid to investors, and the business revenue from the Argentinian gold mines is not enough to support the high returns promised. The in/out flows trend shows that the company has been collecting more cash from new investors to pay off existing investors.
As a result, there are potential assets for seizure, including land and buildings, the investment portfolio, and cash.
Learn more about Forensic Accounting here:
https://brainly.com/question/28145069
#SPJ11
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses?
Answer:
Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”
What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.
What is the meaning of the Constitution?A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.
A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).
The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.
Learn more about the Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ2
Compliance with the law is not always sufficient to determine right behavior because:_________
Explanation:
Compliance with the law is a minimum requirement for ethical behavior, but it is not always sufficient to determine right behavior. This is because the law often represents only the minimum standard of conduct, and it may not reflect the full range of ethical considerations that arise in a particular situation. Moreover, the law can be ambiguous or subject to interpretation, and there may be gaps in the law that leave important ethical issues unresolved. Therefore, while compliance with the law is necessary, it is not always enough to ensure ethical behavior. Additional ethical considerations may include fairness, honesty, respect for others, and a commitment to doing what is right, even when it is difficult or unpopular. Ultimately, ethical behavior requires a commitment to values and principles that go beyond mere compliance with legal requirements.
why were james tallmadge jr.'s amendments to the missouri statehood bill of 1819 controversial?
James Tallmadge Jr.'s amendments to the Missouri statehood bill of 1819 were controversial because they sought to restrict the expansion of slavery.
James Tallmadge Jr.'s amendments to the Missouri statehood bill of 1819 were controversial because they sought to restrict the expansion of slavery. The first amendment proposed to prohibit the further introduction of slaves into Missouri and require the gradual emancipation of those already there. The second amendment aimed to prevent the children of slaves born in Missouri from becoming slaves.
These amendments raised concerns among Southern representatives who saw them as an encroachment on their states' rights and a potential threat to the institution of slavery. The debate over Tallmadge's amendments highlighted the growing sectional tensions between the North and the South regarding the expansion of slavery
To learn more about Controversial visit here:
brainly.com/question/27608094
#SPJ4
Who is the Best Law Firm in Lahore?
Answer:
Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.
Select the examples that best demonstrate likely tasks for Professional Support Services workers. Check all that apply. Leon gives psychological tests to students and assesses their results. Helen sets goals, and creates rules and policies for a school. Alexander helps high-school students decide which classes to take. Ebony helps children find books and magazines in a school library. Kyle teaches a kindergarten class that prepares students for first grade. Francisca is a parent who donates money to a school program.
Answer: 1, 3, 4
Explanation:
i took the test
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
Edge 2021