You spin the spinner, flip a coin, then spin the spinner again. Find the probability of the compound event. Write your answer as a fraction or percent rounded to the nearest tenth. The probability of spinning an odd number, flipping heads, then spinning a 3 is .

So i dont really understand what you are trying to say. Are you trying to say "h=-h+4" and if so the answer is 2

Answer:

answer is 2

Step-by-step explanation:

We get the perimeter of the circle as 87.92 m and area of the circle as 615.44 m².

We are given the radius of the circle as:

Radius = r = 14 m

We are also given the value of π as:

π = 3.14

We need to find the perimeter and area of the circle.

Perimeter of the circle is given by:

Perimeter = 2 π r

Substituting the values in the formula, we get that:

P = 2 × (3.14) × (14) m

P = 87.92 m.

Area of the circle is given by:

Area = π r²

Substituting the values in the formula, we get that:

Area = (3.14) × (14)²

A = 615.44 m²

Therefore, we get the perimeter of the circle as 87.92 m and area of the circle as 615.44 m².

Learn more about perimeter and area here:

https://brainly.com/question/24571594

#SPJ9

Answer:

1. \(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$4\sqrt{2}\cdot\sqrt{2}$}} \implies \boxed{8}\)

2. \(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$3\sqrt{7}-2\sqrt{7}$}} \implies \normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\sqrt{7}$}}\)

3. \(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2\sqrt{7}}$}} \implies \normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\dfrac{1}{2}$}}\)

4. \(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$2\sqrt{5}\cdot 2\sqrt{5}$}} \implies \boxed{20}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

The Radical Rules by Lial et al. (2017) state that:

Product rule: \(\large \textsf{$\sqrt[n]{a}\cdot\sqrt[n]{b}=\sqrt[n]{ab}$}\)

Quotient rule: \(\large \textsf{$\sqrt[n]{\dfrac{a}{b}}=\dfrac{\sqrt[n]{a}}{\sqrt[n]{b}}$}\ \ \textsf{$(b \neq 0)$}\)

1.

\(\implies \normalsize \textsf{$4\sqrt{2}\cdot\sqrt{2}$}\\\\\normalsize \implies \textsf{$4\sqrt{2\cdot2}$}\\\\ \implies \normalsize \textsf{$4\sqrt{4}$}\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$4\cdot 2 = 8$}\)

\(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$4\sqrt{2}\cdot\sqrt{2}$}} \implies \boxed{8}\)

2.

\(\implies \normalsize \textsf{$3\sqrt{7}-2\sqrt{7}$}\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$(3-2)\sqrt{7}$}\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$1\sqrt{7}$}\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$\sqrt{7}$}\)

\(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$3\sqrt{7}-2\sqrt{7}$}} \implies \normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\sqrt{7}$}}\)

3.

\(\implies \normalsize \textsf{$\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2\sqrt{7}}$}\\\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$\dfrac{1\sqrt{7}}{2\sqrt{7}}$}\\\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$\dfrac{1}{2}$}\\\\\)

\(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\dfrac{\sqrt{7}}{2\sqrt{7}}$}} \implies \normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$\dfrac{1}{2}$}}\)

4.

\(\implies \normalsize \textsf{$2\sqrt{5}\cdot 2\sqrt{5}$}\\\\ \implies\normalsize \textsf{$2\cdot2\sqrt{5\cdot5}$}\\\\ \implies \normalsize \textsf{$4\sqrt{25}$}\\\\ \implies \normalsize \textsf{$4\cdot5=20$}\\\\\)

\(\normalsize \boxed{\textsf{$2\sqrt{5}\cdot 2\sqrt{5}$}} \implies \boxed{20}\)

Reference:

Lial, M., Hornsby, J., Schneider, D., & Daniels, C. (2017). College Algebra and Trigonometry, Global Edition (6th ed., p. 94).

Susan bought 6 boxes of chocolate cookies, and 2/5(6) = 2.4 or 2 boxes of butter cookies.

Let's call the number of boxes of chocolate cookies that Susan bought "C". Then, she bought 2/5 as many boxes of butter cookies, which is 2/5C.

Let's call the cost of each box of chocolate cookies "x". Then, the cost of each box of butter cookies is x-2, since each box of butter cookies costs $2 less.

We know that the total cost of the chocolate cookies was $84 more than the total cost of the butter cookies. This can be expressed as:

Cx = 2C/5(x-2) + 84

Simplifying this equation, we get:

3/5Cx = 84 + 2/5C(2)

Multiplying both sides by 5/3, we get:

Cx = 140 + 4C/3

We also know that the total cost of all the cookies was $156, which can be expressed as:

Cx(x) + (2/5C)(x-2) = 156

Substituting Cx from the previous equation, we get:

(140 + 4/3C)(C) + (2/5C)(C-2) = 156

Simplifying and solving for C, we get:

C = 6

So Susan bought 6 boxes of chocolate cookies, and 2/5(6) = 2.4 or 2 boxes of butter cookies.

To know more about Dollar visit:

brainly.com/question/29846475

#SPJ1

The half-life of the radioactive substance is approximately 5.38 years and it would take approximately 15.01 years for the sample to decay to 10 percent of its original amount.

(a) Let's use the formula for exponential decay: \(A = A_0 * e^(-kt)\), where A is the amount of the substance at time t,\(A_0\) is the initial amount, k is the decay constant, and t is time. We know that after one year, \(A/A_0\) = 0.93. We also know that after one half-life, \(A/A_0\) = 0.5. So we can set up the following equation:

0.93 = \(0.5^(1/k)\)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(0.93) = (1/k) × ln(0.5)

Solving for k, we get:

k = ln(2) / (ln(0.5) - ln(0.93)) ≈ 0.129

The half-life is given by:

\(t_{1/2}\) = ln(2) / k ≈ 5.38 years

So the half-life of the substance is approximately 5.38 years.

(b) We want to find the time t such that \(A/A_0\) = 0.1. We can use the same formula as before, but now we know \(A/A_0\) = 0.1 and we want to solve for t:

0.1 = \(e^(-kt)\)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(0.1) = -kt

Solving for t, we get:

t = -ln(0.1) / k ≈ 15.01 years

So it would take approximately 15.01 years for the sample to decay to 10 percent of its original amount.

Learn more about  radioactive here:

https://brainly.com/question/1770619

#SPJ11

We can conclude that the correlation coefficient of -0.587 is statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance with a sample size of 19.

To determine whether the given correlation coefficient is statistically significant at the specified level of significance and sample size, follow these steps:

Step 1: Identify the correlation coefficient (r), level of significance (alpha), and sample size (n).
- r = -0.587
- alpha = 0.05
- n = 19

Step 2: Calculate the degrees of freedom (df).
- df = n - 2
- df = 19 - 2
- df = 17

Step 3: Look up the critical value for the correlation coefficient in a table of critical values or use a statistical software.
- For an alpha level of 0.05 and df = 17, the critical value for a two-tailed test is approximately 0.444 (you can find this value in a table or using software).

Step 4: Compare the absolute value of the correlation coefficient (r) with the critical value.
- |r| = |-0.587| = 0.587

Step 5: Make a decision based on the comparison.
- Since 0.587 > 0.444, we can conclude that the correlation coefficient of -0.587 is statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance with a sample size of 19.

Learn more about Correlation coefficient here: brainly.com/question/15577278

#SPJ11

The given error function E(z), with its z-transform E(z) = 3z³ / (z³ - 9z² + 27z - 27), can be expressed as the product of two z-transform equations E₁(z) and E₂(z), where E₁(z) and E₂(z) are fractional polynomials of z with first-order numerators.

To express E(z) as the product of two z-transform equations E₁(z) and E₂(z), we factorize the denominator of E(z):

E(z) = 3z³ / (z³ - 9z² + 27z - 27)

The denominator can be factored as follows:

z³ - 9z² + 27z - 27 = (z - 3)(z - 3)(z - 3)

Now, we define E₁(z) = 3z / (z - 3) and E₂(z) = z - 3. Multiplying them together, we obtain:

E₁(z) x E₂(z) = (3z / (z - 3)) x (z - 3) = 3z³ / [(z - 3)(z - 3)(z - 3)]

This expression is equal to E(z), as shown by the factored denominator. Therefore, we have proven that E(z) can be written as the product of two z-transform equations E₁(z) and E₂(z), where E₁(z) has a first-order numerator 3z and E₂(z) has a first-order numerator z - 3.

learn more about z-transform here:

https://brainly.com/question/33163485

#SPJ4

The loads carried by an elevator are found to follow a normal distribution with a mean weight of 1812 lbs, and a standard deviation of 105.3 lbs. The answer is c) [1606, 2018].

To answer this question, we need to use the concept of confidence intervals. A 95% confidence interval means that in 95% of all cases, the true population parameter (in this case, the weight of the elevator load) will fall within the interval.

To find the interval centered about the mean, we need to calculate the margin of error first. The formula for margin of error is:

Margin of Error = z*(standard deviation/square root of sample size)

Since we do not have a sample size here, we will use the population standard deviation instead.

For a 95% confidence level, the z-value is 1.96. So, plugging in the values we have:

Margin of Error = 1.96*(105.3/square root of 1)

Margin of Error = 205.97

Now, we can find the interval by adding and subtracting the margin of error from the mean:

Interval = [1812 - 205.97, 1812 + 205.97]

Interval = [1606.03, 2017.97]

Therefore, the answer is c) [1606, 2018].

to learn more about mean click here:

brainly.com/question/30094057

#SPJ11

Answer:

x=2

Step-by-step explanation:

2(3x-2)+2(2x+7)=30

6x-4+4x+14=30

10x+10=30

10x=20

x=2

Car 2 is the better buy with savings of $52 compared to Car 1.

Title: Comparison of Car Purchases

Name: [Your Name]

To determine which car is the better buy, we need to compare the total cost of each car and calculate the savings.

Car 1:

- Purchase price: $4465

- Diagnostic check: $35

- Lien search: $18

- 2 new tires: $145 each = $290

- Safety check: $40

Total cost of Car 1:

$4465 + $35 + $18 + $290 + $40 = $4848

Book value of Car 1: $5000

Car 2:

- Purchase price: $4900

To calculate the savings, we need to find the difference between the total cost of Car 1 and the purchase price of Car 2.

Savings = Total cost of Car 1 - Purchase price of Car 2

Savings = $4848 - $4900

Savings = -$52

Based on the calculations, Car 1 would cost $52 more than Car 2. Therefore, Car 2 is the better buy in terms of cost.

Note: It's important to consider other factors such as the condition, mileage, maintenance history, and warranty coverage when making a car purchase decision. The analysis above only compares the financial aspect of the two options.

learn more about "cost":- https://brainly.com/question/19104371

#SPJ11

Answer:x - 3y = -2, x + 3y = 16. Let us solve the system of linear equations using the substitution method. Therefore, the solution is (7, 3).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

19) 35

20) 38

21) 36

22) 37,800

23) 2,450

24) 47

25) 25,000

26) 820

Answer: Answers Below

Step-by-step explanation:

16-18. 52,39,46

19. 35

20.36

21.39

22. 37,000

23. 2450

24. 47

25 25,000

26. 820

Good luck

The sine function that will model the situation is:

h(t) = 1 * sin(2π/28 * t) + 10, where h(t) represents the water level in feet and t represents the number of days.

To model the water level in the pond using a sine function, we need to consider the period, amplitude, and vertical shift.

Given that the cycle repeats every 28 days, the period of the sine function is 28 days. This means that the function will complete one full cycle every 28 days.

The water level varies between the average level of 10 feet and a maximum level of 12 feet. The difference between these two levels is 2 feet, which represents the amplitude of the sine function.

The sine function is symmetric around the average level, so the vertical shift or the mean value of the function is 10 feet.

Putting all the pieces together, we can write the sine function that models the situation as:

h(t) = 1 * sin(2π/28 * t) + 10

The sine function h(t) = 1 * sin(2π/28 * t) + 10 accurately models the water level in the pond, where h(t) represents the water level in feet and t represents the number of days. This function has a period of 28 days, an amplitude of 2 feet, and a vertical shift of 10 feet. It captures the cyclical nature of the water level, oscillating between the maximum, minimum, and average levels over the course of the 28-day cycle.

To know more about sine function, visit

https://brainly.com/question/21902442

#SPJ11

Answer:

supplementary: 1 and 2, as they add to 180

vertical: 2 and 3, as they are opposite and equal each other.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Supplementary angles are 2 angles that add up to 180 degrees, and vertical angles are angles opposite to each other. So for supplementary, we can have 1-2,3-4,5-6,7-8,1-3,2-4,5-7,6-8.

And for vertical, there can be 5-8,6-7,1-4 and 2-3

.. right?

The point removed would be considered an Influential point

An influential point is an outlier that greatly affects the slope of the regression line.

An outlier is an information point whose reaction y doesn't pursue the overall direction of the other information.

A data point has a high influence in the event that it has "extreme" indicator x qualities. With a single predictor, an extreme x worth is just one that is especially high or low. With numerous indicators, extreme x qualities might be especially high or low for at least one indicator or might be "uncommon" mixes of indicator values (e.g., with two indicators that are decidedly connected, a surprising mix of indicator values may be a high worth of one indicator matched with a low worth of the other indicator).

To learn more about logistic and linear regression,

https://brainly.com/question/27785169

#SPJ4

The length of the diagonal of the square is \(4\sqrt{2}\) units. Additionally, the area of the square is \(16\) square units.

Opportunity cost is the price of giving up an option. An opportunity cost is the price you pay for selecting a particular option over another. Opportunity cost is the benefits you lose by choosing one alternative over another one.”

The value of the next-highest-valued alternative use of a resource is what economists mean when they talk about its "opportunity cost." You cannot, for instance, read a book at home during the time you would have spent seeing a movie and spend the money you would have spent on something else.

Opportunity cost is frequently referred to as the second-best option. The loss of benefit that would have been realized if a different option had been taken is sometimes referred to as the alternative cost. The loss of advantage as a result of a change in decision is another way to explain it.

Learn more about opportunity costs  to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/13036997

#SPJ4

In a certain isoceles triangle, the sum of the measures of the base angles is 88 degrees less than the measure of the remaining angle. Then the measure of each angle is 44° and 92°.

Determine the measure of each angle

These are the specified parameters:

The sum of the measures of the base angles is 88° less than the measure of the remaining angle.

Large pedestal angle

a + a = 88

2a = 88

 a = 88/2

 a = 44°

Peak angle

a + a + b = 180

88 + b = 180

       b = 180 - 88

       b = 92°

Learn more about isosceles triangles here:

brainly.com/question/25812711

#SPJ4

The correct set of possible results would be (0, 1, 0, 0), (1, 2, 1, 0) and (1, 2, 0, 1).

Your approach seems to be correct, but there seems to be a minor mistake in your final list of possible solutions. Let's go through the steps to clarify.

Given the initial conditions z=t=0, you obtained a partial solution (0,1,0,0).

Next, you solved the homogeneous equations for z=1 and t=0, which resulted in a solution (1,1,1,0).

Similarly, solving the homogeneous equations for z=0 and t=1 gives another solution (1,1,0,1).

To find the general solution, you combine the partial solution with the solutions obtained in the previous step, using parameters a and b.

(0,1,0,0) + a(1,1,1,0) + b(1,1,0,1)

Expanding this expression, you get:

(0+a+b, 1+a+b, 0+a, 0+b)

Simplifying, you obtain the following set of solutions:

(0, 1, 0, 0)

(1, 2, 1, 0)

(1, 2, 0, 1)

Therefore, the correct set of possible results would be:

(0, 1, 0, 0)

(1, 2, 1, 0)

(1, 2, 0, 1)

Note that (0, 1, 1, 1) is not a valid solution in this case, as it does not satisfy the initial condition z = 0.

To learn more about set ,

https://brainly.com/question/30368748

#SPJ4

Answer:

y = - \(\frac{1}{4}\) x

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line passing through the origin is

y = mx ( m is the slope )

calculate m using the slope formula

m = \(\frac{y_{2}-y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }\)

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (0, 0) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (4, - 1) ← 2 points on the line

m = \(\frac{-1-0}{4-0}\) = \(\frac{-1}{4}\) = - \(\frac{1}{4}\)

y = - \(\frac{1}{4}\) x ← equation of line

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

wgtvwthrr

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

140 / 20 = 7

so, you need to ride 7 laps per day :)

Heyo! ;D

In order to solve this problem, we simply need to follow the rule of division.

140 ÷ 20 = 7

Hence, if your goal is to ride your bike 140 laps around your block over a 20 day period, you must ride your bike 7 total laps a day to do so.

Hope this helped! If so, please lmk! Tysm and good luck!

Answer: the length of the base is 15 kilometers.

Step-by-step explanation:

formula : Area of parrallelogram  = Length of base x height

Given: Area of parallelogram = 300 square kilometers

height = 20 kilometers

Substituting values in the formula , we get

300 = Length of base x 20

Length of base  = \(\frac{300}{20}\)

= 15 kilometers

Hence, the length of the base is 15 kilometers.

Answer:

I think it's 34.12 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the Phythagorean Theorem, because bisecting a rectangle using the diagonal will produce 2 triangles. The diagonal represents the hypotenuse of the triangle so to solve for it you'd use the formula c² = a²+b²

The solution to the literal equation is y = x - 2.

To solve inequality in y, we need a number such that the assertion holds if we replace y with that number. Isolating the variable on one side of the inequality and leaving the other terms constant is the first step in resolving the inequality.

From the given information:

4x + 1 = 9 + 4y

To solve for y, we have to switch the sides:

9 + 4y = 4x + 1

Subtract 9 from both sides

9 - 9 + 4y = 4x + 1 - 9

4y = 4x - 8

Divide both sides by 4

\(\dfrac{4y}{4}= \dfrac{4x}{4}-\dfrac{8}{4}\)

y = x - 2

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

The price at which the total quantity supplied is 250 is $11.58.

In order to find the price at which the total quantity supplied is 250, we need to equate the total quantity supplied by both producers (Supply 1 and Supply 2) and solve for the price.

Supply 1: P = 6 + 0.7Q

Supply 2: P = 16 + 0.6Q

To find the equilibrium price, we set the total quantity supplied equal to 250:

0.7Q + 0.6Q = 250

1.3Q = 250

Q = 250 / 1.3 ≈ 192.31

Now that we have the quantity, we can substitute it back into either supply function to find the price. Let's use Supply 1:

P = 6 + 0.7Q

P = 6 + 0.7 * 192.31

P ≈ 6 + 134.62

P ≈ 140.62

Therefore, the price at which the total quantity supplied is 250 is approximately $11.58.

Learn more about Equilibrium price

brainly.com/question/29099220

#SPJ11

If two methods agree perfectly in a method comparison study, the slope equals 1.0 and the y-intercept equals 0.0. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer.

In a method comparison study, the goal is to compare the agreement between two different measurement methods or instruments. The relationship between the measurements obtained from the two methods can be described by a linear equation of the form y = mx + b, where y represents the measurements from one method, x represents the measurements from the other method, m represents the slope, and b represents the y-intercept.

When the two methods agree perfectly, it means that there is a one-to-one relationship between the measurements obtained from each method. In other words, for every x value, the corresponding y value is the same. This indicates that the slope of the line connecting the measurements is 1.0, reflecting a direct proportional relationship.

Additionally, when the two methods agree perfectly, there is no systematic difference or offset between the measurements. This means that the line connecting the measurements intersects the y-axis at 0.0, indicating that the y-intercept is 0.0.

Therefore, in a perfect agreement scenario, the slope equals 1.0 and the y-intercept equals 0.0, which corresponds to option (b).

Learn more about y-intercept here:

https://brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ11