1. Which of the following accurately describes the data in these graphs?
(A) The Warren Court tended to act conservatively when it overturned
prior Court precedents.
(B) The Supreme Court overturns more federal laws each year than it
overturns prior Supreme Court precedents.
(C) The Burger Court struck down a greater number of precedents
annually than the Rehnquist Court did.
(D) The Roberts Court struck down more laws than its predecessors.

Answer:

Yes, I love these types of questions.

Explanation:

The Yoruba practice

I hope I answered your question

Hope this helps ;)

The Allies proposed a "Europe First" strategy during World War II because Germany posed the most serious, long-term threat to all Allied countries.

Even though Japan had not attacked any of the Allied countries, the Allied leaders recognized that Germany's military power and territorial ambitions posed a significant threat to the security and stability of Europe and the world.

Germany had already annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia and had launched a massive invasion of the Soviet Union, which posed a threat not only to the Soviet Union but also to the rest of Europe. The Allies recognized that defeating Germany would be a crucial step in securing the long-term peace and stability of Europe.

Furthermore, the United States had already been attacked by European powers, namely Germany, in the form of the sinking of the USS Reuben James and the attack on Pearl Harbor. This made it clear to the Allied leaders that Europe, under the control of Nazi Germany, posed a significant threat to the United States and its allies.

Additionally, the Soviet Union did not have any territory outside of Europe, which made it difficult for the Soviet Union to directly participate in the war effort outside of Europe. Therefore, the Allies recognized that focusing their efforts on defeating Germany in Europe was the most effective way to defeat the Axis powers and achieve victory in the war.

Overall, the "Europe First" strategy was proposed because Germany posed the most serious, long-term threat to the security and stability of Europe and the world. By defeating Germany, the Allies believed that they could secure a lasting peace and prevent future wars from threatening the world's stability.

Learn more about World War II here:

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ11

Answer:Germany posed the most serious long term threat to all allied countries

Explanation:

Answer: The Union

Explanation:

Answer: false, it was established in 1607

Explanation:

Answer:

The history of West Africa has been commonly divided into its prehistory, the Iron Age in Africa, the major polities flourishing, the colonial period, and finally the post-independence era, in which the current nations were formed. West Africa is west of an imagined north-south axis lying close to 10° east longitude, bordered by the Atlantic Ocean and Sahara Desert.

Colonial boundaries are reflected in the modern boundaries between contemporary West African states, cutting across ethnic and cultural lines, often dividing single ethnic groups between two or more states. During the Holocene, sedentary farming began to develop in West Africa. The Iron industry, in both smelting and forging for tools and weapons, appeared in Sub-Saharan Africa by 1200 BCE, and by 400 BCE, contact had been made with the Mediterranean civilizations, and a regular trade included exporting gold, cotton, metal, and leather in exchange for copper, horses, salt, textiles, and beads. The Nok culture (1500 BCE - 200/300 BCE) would develop.[1] and vanished under unknown circumstances around 500 AD, thus having lasted approximately 2,000 years.[2] The Serer people would construct the Senegambian stone circles (3rd century BCE - 16th century CE). The Sahelian kingdoms were a series of kingdoms or empires that were built on the Sahel, the area of grasslands south of the Sahara. They controlled the trade routes across the desert, and were also quite decentralised, with member cities having a great deal of autonomy. The Ghana Empire may have been established as early as the 7th century CE. It was succeeded by the Sosso in 1230, the Mali Empire in the 13th century CE, and later by the Songhai and Sokoto Caliphate. There were also a number of forest empires and states in this time period.

Following the collapse of the Songhai Empire, a number of smaller states arose across West Africa, including the Bambara Empire of Ségou, the lesser Bambara kingdom of Kaarta, the Fula/Malinké kingdom of Khasso (in present-day Mali's Kayes Region), and the Kénédougou Empire of Sikasso. European traders first became a force in the region in the 15th century. The transatlantic African slave trade resumed, with the Portuguese taking hundreds of captives back to their country for use as slaves; however, it would not begin on a grand scale until Christopher Columbus's voyage to the Americas and the subsequent demand for cheap colonial labour. As the demand for slaves increased, some African rulers sought to supply the demand by constant war against their neighbours, resulting in fresh captives. European, American and Haitian governments passed legislation prohibiting the Atlantic slave trade in the 19th century, though the last country to abolish the institution was Brazil in 1888.

In 1725, the cattle-herding Fulanis of Fouta Djallon launched the first major reformist jihad of the region, overthrowing the local animist, Mande-speaking elites and attempting to somewhat democratize their society. At the same time, the Europeans started to travel into the interior of Africa to trade and explore. Mungo Park (1771–1806) made the first serious expedition into the region's interior, tracing the Niger River as far as Timbuktu. French armies followed not long after. In the Scramble for Africa in the 1880s the Europeans started to colonise the inland of West Africa, they had previously mostly controlled trading ports along the coasts and rivers. Following World War II, campaigns for independence sprung up across West Africa, most notably in Ghana under the Pan-Africanist Kwame Nkrumah (1909–1972). After a decade of protests, riots and clashes, French West Africa voted for autonomy in a 1958 referendum, dividing into the states of today; most of the British colonies gained autonomy the following decade. Since independence, West Africa has suffered from the same problems as much of the African continent, particularly dictatorships, political corruption and military coups; it has also seen bloody civil wars. The development of oil and mineral wealth has seen the steady modernization of some countries since the early 2000s, though inequality persists hope this helps

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

primary source>

Answer:

what we have to do in these que

Explanation:

I Don't understand

After World War I, nationalism started to emerge in Asia and Africa. It gave birth to figures like Mahatma Gandhi in India, Sun Yat-sen in China, Sad Pasha Zaghl in Egypt, Ibn Saud in the Arabian Peninsula, and Kemal Atatürk in Turkey.

In 1923, Atatürk was able to replace the Islamic monarchy's antiquated organizational framework with a modernized and reinvigorated secular republic. African and Asian imperialism, as well as French imperialism, all resisted calls for Arab unification. But by aiding in the establishment of an independent Egypt, Britain may have demonstrated a talent for compromising with the new forces.(1922; fully, 1936) and Iraq (1932) and demonstrated a similar spirit in India, where the Indian National Congress, established in 1885 to advance a liberal nationalism based on the British model, grew more radical after 1918. Germany's influence on Japan led to the use of contemporary industrial techniques in support of an increasingly authoritarian nationalism.

learn more about african and asian leaders here:

https://brainly.com/question/14585252

#SPJ4

Answer:

Provisions and effects of the Dawes Act

As a result of the Dawes Act, tribal lands were parceled out into individual plots. Only those Native Americans who accepted the individual plots of land were allowed to become US citizens. The remainder of the land was then sold off to white settlers.

I HOPE THIS ANSWERS HELPFUL.

HAVE A GREAT DAY LOL...

Answer:

the first picture is for the question 8 , the second picture is for question 9 and there'd picture is for question 7 hope its helpful and good luck.

Answer: Byzantine gained control of their capital city, Constantinople became the capital, The Ottoman empire gained power and influence

Explanation:

Answer:

 Byzantine gained control of their capital city, Constantinople became the capital, The Ottoman empire gained power and influence

Both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire were significant political systems in the history of the Western world. While the Republic was characterized by a more balanced system of power, the Empire was more centralized and authoritarian. Despite their differences, both systems experienced successes and failures.

In terms of success, the Roman Republic was a triumph of political organization. It established a system of checks and balances that ensured no single individual or group could wield too much power. This was achieved through a system of two consuls, a Senate, and various assemblies. Additionally, the Republic saw the development of important legal and administrative institutions such as the Twelve Tables, which codified Roman law, and the Cursus Honorum, which provided a clear path for political advancement. Another success of the Republic was its ability to expand its territory and influence through military conquest. The Roman Empire, on the other hand, was successful in creating a vast and powerful state that lasted for centuries. The Empire provided stability and security to its citizens through a strong military, efficient administration, and a system of laws. It also facilitated the spread of Greco-Roman culture, including art, philosophy, and architecture, throughout the Mediterranean and beyond. However, both systems also had their failures. The Roman Republic was plagued by political corruption and instability, particularly in the later years of the Republic, as powerful individuals vied for control. Additionally, the Republic's reliance on slave labor led to economic inequality and social unrest. The Roman Empire, despite its impressive accomplishments, was also marked by political corruption, economic instability, and internal conflict. Its centralized power also made it vulnerable to the whims of its rulers, leading to erratic policies and tyrannical rule. In conclusion, while both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire were successful in certain respects, they also faced significant challenges and shortcomings. The Republic's system of checks and balances provided a strong foundation for the development of Western political thought, while the Empire's achievements in creating a powerful and enduring state left a lasting legacy in culture and governance. However, their failures and weaknesses remind us of the importance of political stability, economic equality, and effective governance in any political system.

For more information on Mediterranean see:

https://brainly.com/question/3222295

#SPJ1

Answer:

D He removed all power from the tribunes

Answer:

Correct answer is D

Explanation:

Took the test

The rise of the industrial economy and the increased demand for professional work opportunities for women in the late 19th century prompted American parents.

In the 1870s and 1880s to believe that a high school education was the key to future success and independence for their daughters. As industrial factories grew in size and strength, more women entered the workforce. This meant that women needed more than a basic education to compete with their male counterparts.

Parents started to realize that their daughters would need the kinds of skills and knowledge that a high school education could provide in order to succeed in the growing professional world. Families began to see a high school education for their daughters not only as an economic opportunity, but also as a cultural and educational choice that could help empower their daughters to become independent.

To know more about industrial economy , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1698615

#SPJ4

To attempt to overthrow the authority of the state is to rebel.

That indicates that the executive (Government), the legislature (Parliament), and the judiciary are the three distinct but interrelated components or branches of the state (Courts of law). The method of enacting laws and the role of the legislative bodies are determined by the principle of the separation of powers, which is acknowledged by modern constitutional states. The three branches of the state government—legislative, executive, and judicial—are separated by this idea. To prevent one branch from interfering with the operations of the other two branches, the state is separated into three distinct branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each has distinct independent powers and responsibilities.

The complete question is:

To attempt to overthrow the authority of the state;

to rebel

to control

to repeat

None of the above

To know more about Authority of state visit:

brainly.com/question/1563555

#SPJ1

The prerequisite condition for job rotation is the presence of employees with similar skill sets and requirements.

The answer is C.

Job rotation is the practice of switching employees between different work assignments or tasks within the same organization. This allows employees to develop skills and knowledge in different areas of the workplace and to experience different work environments. It allows for an equitable distribution of workload, alleviates worker boredom, increases productivity, and further allows workers to gain insights into other areas of functioning of the organization.

For this to be successful, it is necessary for the organization to have organized various types of job activities that are manageable and require similar skill sets and qualifications from the workers. This will ensure that transfers from one task to another are made without any difficulty and with adequate outcomes being achieved.

To know more about job rotation, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1079088

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

As a Supreme Court justice, my initial reactions to the situation would depend on the specific details and context of the case at hand. However, when considering the War Powers Act, it is important to evaluate the roles and powers of each branch of government involved in order to determine which branch may be in the right.

The War Powers Act is designed to address the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches regarding the use of military force. It sets guidelines for the president's authority to deploy troops without a declaration of war and imposes certain reporting requirements to Congress.

In this case, I would assess whether the president's actions in deploying troops align with the provisions and limitations outlined in the War Powers Act. I would carefully consider the extent of the president's powers as commander-in-chief and whether they have been exceeded, leading to a potential infringement on Congress's authority to declare war or provide authorization for military actions.

During oral arguments, I would ask both sides to explain their respective points of view. To the executive branch, I would inquire about the legal justification and rationale for the deployment of troops, seeking clarification on the specific provisions of the War Powers Act that were considered in making the decision. I would also ask whether the president followed the required reporting procedures to Congress.

To the legislative branch, I would inquire about their interpretation of the War Powers Act and whether they believe the president's actions exceeded his authority. I would seek explanations regarding their understanding of Congress's role in declaring war or authorizing military actions and how they believe the president's actions align or deviate from these constitutional provisions.

Additional questions could include seeking clarification on the immediacy and necessity of the deployment, the potential national security implications, the presence of any ongoing threat, and the extent of consultation and communication between the executive and legislative branches.

Through these questions, I would aim to gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal arguments, constitutional implications, and factual circumstances surrounding the case to make an informed decision in accordance with the War Powers Act and the principles of checks and balances outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Brackish tidal water proved to be the worst aspect of the location and Tobacco proved to be the salvation of Jamestown.

However, the setting was terrible. Indians had shunned the peninsula due to its poor soil, which made it difficult to cultivate crops, and its brackish tidal water, which caused crippling sickness. Jamestown, the first permanent English colony in the modern United States, was built by the English despite these difficulties.

It lacked stable water, was swampy, and was covered in mosquitoes. Because the James River runs slowly even when conditions are ideal, there was not enough water present throughout the summer to keep the colonists from being exposed to the brackish upflow of the Chesapeake.

To know more about Tobacco, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/984821

#SPJ4

Answer:

British rule had several effects on the Hindu-Muslim relationship. ... But since no agreement was reached between the two parties, the only viable solution to preserve the peace in the subcontinent was to partition it into a Muslim-dominated area and a Hindu-dominated one.

Explanation:

The Texas Revolution, which lasted from October 2, 1835, to April 21, 1836, was sparked by settlers' uprising against the national Mexican government in the Mexican province of Texas.

What was the Texas Revolution?

Although there had been conflicts between the Mexican government and the increasing number of American immigrants in Texas for more than a century, when the Revolution started, the Americans in Texas were unsure whether the aim was independence or a return to the Constitution of 1824. A Texas population boom and a sizable contingent of American volunteers attacked and overran the Mexican defence strongholds by December 1835 as envoys discussed the causes of the conflict.

President Antonio López de Santa Anna promised that he would personally take Texas back after the Mexican government refused to acknowledge independence and set up a temporary local administration. However, this administration was unable to contain the revolution that had started. Midway through February 1836, the Mexican Army arrived in Texas and discovered Texans to be the least prepared. They defeated them in the Goliad Campaign and executed all Texans who had given themselves up. At the Battle of the Alamo, Santa Anna also oversaw a different campaign in which every member of the opposing army perished.

During the Battle of San Jacinto the next month, the New Texas Army under the command of Sam Houston surprised the Mexican army and seized Santa Anna in return for his freedom. The Mexican army was then forced to flee south, and the Republic of Texas was established.

To learn more about the Texas revolution from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/12153172

#SPJ4

In 1824, Mexico had become an independent nation and approved its first constitution. However, soon after president Bustamante took power, he refused to honor the constitution and the rights it gave to citizens and residents of Mexico. Explain how this led to the Texas revolution.

Answer:

(D) People bought more goods and created high demand for new products.

Explanation:

During the early 1920s, easy consumer credit helped the U.S. economy by allowing people to purchase goods on credit. This led to increased consumer spending and higher demand for products. As a result, businesses experienced higher sales and profits, which stimulated economic growth. The availability of easy credit made it easier for individuals to make purchases and fuelled a consumer-driven economy during that period.

\(\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}\)

♥️ \(\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}\)

In the 1820s and 1830s, the labor force for factory work in the United States rapidly grew, in part, due to improved public health. so option A is the correct answer.

This growth was fueled by increased immigration, urbanization, and improved living conditions, which contributed to a larger and healthier workforce available for factory work.

While improved public health did contribute to population growth in the United States during this time period, it was not the primary factor in the growth of the labor force for factory work. The expansion of industrialization and manufacturing, technological advances, and new transportation infrastructure, such as canals and railroads, led to a greater demand for labor in factories.

Additionally, the labor force was also fueled by immigration, as many Europeans came to the United States seeking work in factories and other industries. Many Americans also left farming and other traditional occupations to work in factories, drawn by the higher wages and steady employment offered by industrial work.

Therefore, the rapid growth of the labor force for factory work in the United States during the 1820s and 1830s was due to a combination of factors, including industrialization, immigration, and changes in the economy and employment opportunities.

To know more about labor force: https://brainly.com/question/14328462

#SPJ11

Answer: C, I think.

Explanation: The whole point of free speech is that you can have any opinion, and that you can state it. Therefore, it would not be reasonable to restrict the claims in A B and C because that would be putting down other opinions. In answer C, the person is not trying to stop other opinions, they are causing unnecessary havoc. I hope this answers your question. :)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

southern magnolia

southwestern

Explanation:

Answer:

The concept that men should be treated equally began to be sought-after by other nations. This concept that was influenced by several key circumstances. For one, France was influenced by the lifestyle changes of the industrial revolution, along with other historical events at that time.

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)

Senators in most states serve 4-year terms while Representatives serve 2-year terms.

Members of the House of Representatives serve two-year terms and are re-elected every even year. Senators, on the other hand, serve six-year terms, and elections to the Senate are staggered over even years, so that only about one-third of the Senate is up for reelection at any given time.

Each state sends two Senators to the United States Senate to represent them. In the House of Representatives, however, a state's representation is determined by its population. Smaller states, such as Vermont and Delaware, have one representative, whereas large states, such as California, have 53.

Read more about Senators

brainly.com/question/25132339

#SPJ1

When gerrymandering would intensify, the variables assigned as the root cause of periods in U.S. history are: Redistricting, Constituency, Majority.

Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing the boundaries of an electoral constituency to favor a particular political party or group.

Gerrymandering is used to create a political advantage for a particular party or group by making changes to the district boundaries.

The practice is named after Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry, who drew a distorted district in 1812 to favor his party. It looked like a salamander on the map and was named "Gerry-mander".

Gerrymandering can be done in a variety of ways, but the most common method is to draw district boundaries that favor a particular political party or group.

This can be achieved by drawing districts that are "packed" with supporters of one political party or group, making it difficult for the other party to win.

Incorporate small, isolated pockets of supporters of one political party or group into larger districts that are dominated by the other party, diluting their voting power.

Create "safe" districts that are dominated by one political party or group, effectively giving them control of that district for an extended period.

To know more about gerrymandering, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29550779#

#SPJ11

ppl never change science tells us that our genetic imprint predetermines your faith your character your choices pinanganak kang bobo lalaki kang bobo!

Answer:

to protect American lands from future European colonization

Explanation:

Answer: It showed America's desire to be viewed as an international power.

Explanation: The Monroe Doctrine was drafted in response to threats by European powers to help Spain recover Latin American colonies that had declared their independence. The Doctrine made it clear that Europe should have no claim on independent American republics.