1/4 *3/5 im not sure how to do this for dure i need help

a. The probability that the sample proportion will be within +-0.04 of the population proportion is 0.6826.

b. The probability that the sample proportion will be within +-0.08 of the population proportion is 0.9544.

1. Calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula SE = sqrt(p(1-p)/n), where p is the population proportion and n is the sample size. In this case, SE = sqrt(0.20(1-0.20)/250) = 0.0283.

2. For part a, find the z-score for the range of interest, which is +-0.04. Divide the range by the standard error: z = 0.04/0.0283 = 1.413.

3. Use the z-table to find the probability corresponding to the z-score: P(z = 1.413) = 0.3413. Since we're looking for the probability within the range, double this value: 0.3413 * 2 = 0.6826.

4. For part b, follow the same process with the range of interest being +-0.08. Calculate the z-score: z = 0.08/0.0283 = 2.827.

5. Use the z-table to find the probability corresponding to the z-score: P(z = 2.827) = 0.4772. Double this value for the probability within the range: 0.4772 * 2 = 0.9544.

To know more about z-score click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15016913#

#SPJ11

A positive integer y is a whole number by definition, so we are essentially being asked how many positive integers there are. There are infinitely many positive integers, so the answer to the question is also infinity.

A positive integer y is a whole number if it isn't a bit or a numeric. In other words, it's a number that can be expressed without using  fragments or numbers, and can be written as a finite sum of positive integers. For  illustration, 2, 5, and 10 are whole  figures, but3/4,1.5, and √ 2 are not.   To determine how  numerous different values of y are whole  figures, we need to understand the  parcels of whole  figures.

Whole  figures have two main  parcels they're closed under addition and  addition. This means that when you add or multiply two whole  figures, the result is always a whole number. For  illustration, 2 3 =  5 and 2 × 3 =  6, both of which are whole  figures.   To find how  numerous different values of y are whole  figures, we can start with the  lowest possible value of y, which is 1.

Learn more about whole numbers at

https://brainly.com/question/27934713

#SPJ1

Answer: x^2 + 6x + 9

Step-by-step explanation:

first, you square everything.

x^2 + 2x x 3 + 3^2

then, you calculate/evaluate.

x^2 + 6x + 9

The surface area of the given sphere is approximately 2124 units². The correct answer is option A.

The surface area of a sphere is given by the formula:

SA = 4πr²

Here r is the radius of the sphere and π is a constant approximately equal to 3.14.

As per the question, the radius of a sphere is 13 units.

Substituting the given value of r = 13 units, we get:

surface area of a sphere = 4π(13)²

surface area of a sphere = 4π(169)

surface area of a sphere = 676π  units²

Therefore, the given surface area of a sphere is 676π units².

Hence, the correct answer is option A.

Learn more about the surface area of a sphere here:

https://brainly.com/question/29251585

#SPJ5

We are given that the inside diameter of a piston ring is a random variable with mean value 10 cm and standard deviation 0.07 cm.

We are asked to find the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for two different random samples of n=16 and n=64 piston rings, respectively, and to calculate the standard deviation of each sampling distribution.

The sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is the distribution of all possible sample means that could be obtained from a given sample size n.

The central limit theorem tells us that for large enough sample sizes (typically n ≥ 30), the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normal, regardless of the shape of the underlying population distribution.

The mean of the sampling distribution of the sample mean is equal to the population mean, and the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size.

For the first random sample of n=16 piston rings, the center of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is still 10 cm, as this is the population mean.

However, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation of 0.07 cm divided by the square root of 16, which is 0.0175 cm. Therefore, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for the first random sample is 0.0175 cm.

For the second random sample of n=64 piston rings, the center of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter is still 10 cm, but the standard deviation of the sampling distribution is equal to the population standard deviation of 0.07 cm divided by the square root of 64, which is 0.00875 cm.

Therefore, the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean diameter for the second random sample is 0.00875 cm.

Finally, we are asked which of the two random samples is more likely to have a sample mean diameter within 0.01 cm of 10 cm. Since the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean decreases as the sample size increases, the second random sample of n=64 piston rings is more likely to have a sample mean diameter within 0.01 cm of 10 cm.

This is because the decreased variability of the sampling distribution means that the sample means are more tightly clustered around the population mean of 10 cm. Therefore, we can conclude that the second random sample is more precise than the first random sample.

In statistics, a random sample is a subset of a larger population that is selected in such a way that each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample.

Random sampling is a crucial tool for drawing conclusions about a population based on a smaller subset of data. In this problem, we will explore the sampling distribution of the sample mean for two different random samples of piston rings.

To know mare about random sample refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29852583#

#SPJ11

Answer:

the fiorst plan

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

hope this helps plz mark brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Hence Maria does not have enugh money to buy the coat in week 2 of the sale

Normal price of a coat : 65

As in week 1 of the sale = 65 - 20/100 x 65

= 65 - 13 = 52

Also in week 2 of the sale the price of the coat is reduced by a futher 10

Since he started with Nothing

He had zero initially

After x Months...

He'll have 10x naxvips

in slope intercept form

y=10x

To get the y values ... substitute the corresponding x value

For x=0

y=10(0)

y=0. Which is true cos he had no naxvip initially

x=1

y=10(1)

=10. Which is true cos he buys 10 more monthly... So 10 + 0 = 10.

x=2

y=10(2) = 20. This is true cos he added an additional 10 after each month

x=7

y=70.

The measures of the angles are 30, 60 and 90 degrees

To determine the value, we need to know that the following;

From the information given, we have that;

The angle measures are 6x, 4x and 2x

Equate the measures to 180 degree

We have;

6x + 4x + 2x = 180

collect the like terms

12x = 180

divide by the coefficient

x = 15

then, 2x = 2(15) = 30 degrees

4x = 4(15) = 60 degrees

6x = 6(15) = 90 degrees

Learn more about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/25215131

#SPJ1

A graph that shows the line of best fit for the data include the following: B. graph B.

In Mathematics and Statistics, there are different characteristics that are used for determining the line of best fit on a scatter plot and these include the following:

By critically observing the scatter plots using the aforementioned characteristics, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that scatter plot B or graph B best models the relationship between the data because the end points would be equally divided on both sides of the line with a positive slope and a y-intercept of 8.

Read more on line of best fit here: brainly.com/question/12284501

#SPJ1

The set of numbers, from greatest to least that is in ascending order, is 7.37, 7.36, 7.33, 3.0, 2.4.

First, let's look at the whole numbers in the set: 3 and 7. It's clear that 7 is larger than 3, so we can put them in order like this: 7, 3.

Next, let's look at the mixed number: 7 1/3. We can convert this to a decimal by dividing 1 by 3 and adding it to 7, giving us 7.33. Now we can compare this decimal to the others in the set. We can see that 7.36 is larger than 7.33, so we put them in order like this: 7.36, 7.33.

Now we have three decimals left to order: 2.4, 3.0, and 221/30. To compare the decimals, we can look at the whole number parts first. 3 is clearly larger than 2, so we put them in order like this: 3.0, 2.4.

Finally, we need to compare 221/30 to the decimals we have already ordered. We can convert 221/30 to a decimal by dividing 221 by 30, giving us 7.37. We can see that 7.37 is larger than both 2.4 and 3.0, so we put them in order like this: 7.37, 3.0, 2.4.

To know more about ascending order here

https://brainly.com/question/31324289

#SPJ4

a) The 95% confidence interval is (10.85%, 17.23%).

b) The correct answer is B.

c) "95% confidence" means that approximately 95% of random samples of size n will produce confidence intervals that contain the true parameter value.

d) The confidence interval contradicts the assertion of the politician.

a) Using the given information, we can calculate the confidence interval for the percentage of all auto accidents involving teenage drivers.

The percentage of accidents involving teenagers can be calculated as:

Percentage = (Number of accidents involving teenagers / Total number of accidents) * 100

In this case, the number of accidents involving teenagers is 82, and the total number of accidents is 584.

Percentage = (82 / 584) * 100 ≈ 14.04%

Confidence Interval = Percentage ± (Z * Standard Error)

where Z is the critical value corresponding to the desired confidence level (95% confidence corresponds to Z ≈ 1.96), and the Standard Error is calculated as:

Standard Error = sqrt((Percentage * (100 - Percentage)) / n)

where n is the total number of accidents.

Standard Error = sqrt((14.04 * (100 - 14.04)) / 584) ≈ 1.62%

Confidence Interval = 14.04% ± (1.96 * 1.62%) ≈ (10.85%, 17.23%)

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the percentage of all auto accidents involving teenage drivers is approximately (10.85%, 17.23%).

b) The correct answer is B. We are 95% confident that the true percentage of accidents involving teenagers falls inside the confidence interval limits. This means that if we were to repeat the sampling and construct a confidence interval in a large number of similar experiments, approximately 95% of those intervals would contain the true percentage of accidents involving teenagers.

c) "95% confidence" means that if we were to repeat the sampling and construct confidence intervals in a large number of similar experiments, approximately 95% of those intervals would contain the true parameter value (in this case, the percentage of accidents involving teenagers). It does not imply a 95% probability for a specific interval to contain the true parameter value.

d) The confidence interval contradicts the assertion of the politician. The figure quoted by the politician, which states that "In one of every five auto accidents, a teenager is behind the wheel," is outside the calculated confidence interval of (10.85%, 17.23%).

To know more about confidence interval, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ4

If you want to gather data on how well examinees can recognize the appropriate concepts, then multiple-choice test questions would be the most appropriate type of test question.

Multiple-choice questions are the most appropriate type of test question to assess how well examinees can recognize the appropriate concepts because they present the examinee with a set of possible answers, one of which is correct.

It is important to ensure that all of the incorrect options are plausible to make the question more challenging and to ensure that the examinee has to think carefully to identify the correct answer.

Learn more about multiple-choice questions at:

https://brainly.com/question/31238337

#SPJ11

Answer:

X^2 + 10x +24

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps!

For Eric and Bianca to be able to draw a model of a city park in the coordinate, they can follow the description in the image attached.

In the are of math and geometry, a coordinate system is known to be a kind of a system which is known to often uses a lot of numbers or only one to show the  position of any given points.

Note that to be able to design the part to their taste and with the right coordinates, For Eric and Bianca to be able to draw a model of a city park in the coordinate, they can follow the description in the image attached.

Learn more about coordinate from

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ1

Answer:

Vertex Q has an x-coordinate of 7. To form quadrilateral QRST, vertex T must be 3 units down from vertex Q. Vertex T should be at (7,3) .

Bianca is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps.

0.368 .

The probability that a random variable x is exponentially distributed and less than 45 minutes,

given that the average value is 45 minutes, is 0.368.

This can be calculated by taking the negative of the natural logarithm of 1/2 (i.e. -ln(0.5)) and dividing it by the average value of 45 minutes.

The result, -ln(0.5)/45, equals 0.368, rounded to three decimal places.

Learn more about natural logarithm

brainly.com/question/29195789

#SPJ11

The actual length of the bus which has a scale factor of 10:1 in drawing and actual is of 45 feet.

Scale factor defines how many times less or more something is in different representations.

According to the given question the drawing that has been made in of 1/2 inches when the actual object has a length of 5 feet.

∴ The actual object has a scale factor of [5/(1/2)] which is,

= 5 × (2/1).

= 10.

So, the length of the bus which has 4 and 1/2 inches on the drawing has actual length 10 times to the drawing.

So, The actual length of the bus is = \(4\frac{1}{2}\)× 10 feet.

= 4.5× 10 feet.

= 45 feet.

learn more about scale factor here :

https://brainly.com/question/22312172

#SPJ1

a) This is a valid recursive definition of a function f from the set of nonnegative integers to the set of integers. The formula for f(n) is f(n) = f(n-1) for n ≥ 1. To prove that this formula is valid, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case: f(0) = 1, which is true.

Inductive step: Assume that f(k) = f(k-1) for some k ≥ 1. Then f(k+1) = f(k) = f(k-1) = f(k+1-1), which is true.

Therefore, the formula is valid.

b) This is a valid recursive definition of a function f from the set of nonnegative integers to the set of integers. The formula for f(n) is f(n) = 2f(n-3) for n ≥ 3. To prove that this formula is valid, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case: f(0) = 1, f(1) = 0, f(2) = 2, which are all true.

Inductive step: Assume that f(k) = 2f(k-3) for some k ≥ 3. Then f(k+1) = 2f(k+1-3) = 2f(k-2) = 2(2f(k-3)) = 2f(k), which is true.

Therefore, the formula is valid.

c) This is not a valid recursive definition of a function f from the set of nonnegative integers to the set of integers because the recursive step does not define f(n) for all n ≥ 0.

d) This is a valid recursive definition of a function f from the set of nonnegative integers to the set of integers. The formula for f(n) is f(n) = 2f(n-1) for n ≥ 1. To prove that this formula is valid, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case: f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, which are both true.

Inductive step: Assume that f(k) = 2f(k-1) for some k ≥ 1. Then f(k+1) = 2f(k+1-1) = 2f(k) = 2(2f(k-1)) = 2f(k+1-1), which is true.

Therefore, the formula is valid.

e) This is a valid recursive definition of a function f from the set of nonnegative integers to the set of integers. The formula for f(n) is f(n) = f(n-1) if n is odd and n ≥1 and f(n) = 2f(n-2) if n≥ 2. To prove that this formula is valid, we can use mathematical induction.

Base case: f(0) = 2, which is true.

Inductive step: Assume that f(k) = f(k-1) if k is odd and k ≥ 1 and f(k) = 2f(k-2) if k ≥ 2.

If k is odd, then f(k+1) = f(k) = f(k-1) = f(k+1-1), which is true.

If k is even, then f(k+1) = 2f(k+1-2) = 2f(k) = 2(2f(k-2)) = 2f(k+1-2), which is true.

Therefore, the formula is valid.

a) The formula for f(n) is (-1)ⁿ and b) The formula for f(n) is f(n) = 2k.

a) The proposed definition of function f is a valid recursive definition as it defines f(0) as 1 and then uses the previous value of f(n-1) to determine the value of f(n) for all n greater than or equal to 1. To find the formula for f(n), we can use induction. We can see that f(1) = -f(0) = -1, f(2) = -f(1) = 1, f(3) = -f(2) = -1, and so on. Thus, we can see that f(n) alternates between 1 and -1, depending on whether n is odd or even. Therefore, the formula for f(n) is (-1)ⁿ.

b) The proposed definition of function f is also a valid recursive definition as it defines f(0), f(1), and f(2), and then uses the previous value of f(n-3) to determine the value of f(n) for all n greater than or equal to 3. To find the formula for f(n), we can again use induction. We can see that f(3) = 2f(0) = 2, f(4) = 2f(1) = 0, f(5) = 2f(2) = 4, f(6) = 2f(3) = 4, f(7) = 2f(4) = 0, and so on.

Thus, we can see that f(n) alternates between 0 and 2, depending on whether n is congruent to 1 or 2 mod 3. Therefore, the formula for f(n) is f(n) = 2k, where k is the number of times n-3 can be divided by 3 before reaching a number less than or equal to 2. This formula is valid as it agrees with our observations and satisfies the recursive definition.

For more about formula:

https://brainly.com/question/30098455

#SPJ4

Answer:

1.31

Step-by-step explanation:

= \(\frac{64}{56}\)^2 x \(\frac{1}{2.92}\)^3 x 2.48

= 1.31 x 0.40 x 2.48

= 0.524 x 2.48

= 1.31

:)

Answer was verified and rounded

When the assumption in the Fixed Effects regression, which states that the covariance between the error terms (uit, uis) and the covariates (xit, xis) is zero for t ≠ s, is violated, the correct statement among the options provided is:

A) Using heteroskedastic-robust standard errors is not sufficient for correct statistical inference when using OLS.

The violation of the assumption leads to a situation called "clustered errors" or "within-group correlation." In this case, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator remains consistent, but the standard errors estimated by OLS become biased. Using heteroskedastic-robust standard errors addresses heteroskedasticity in the error terms but does not correct for the within-group correlation.

To obtain correct statistical inference in the presence of within-group correlation, researchers typically employ cluster-robust standard errors or adjust the standard errors using cluster-robust variance estimators.

Learn more about heteroskedastic-robust here : brainly.com/question/18403256

#SPJ11

Answer:

0.185 converted into a fraction is 5/27

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3(9x+3)=3x+1 multiply inside the parenthesis with 1/3

(9x+3)/3 = 3x + 1 multiply both sides of the equation by 3

9x + 3 = 9x + 3 add like terms

0 = 0 which means there are infinitely many solutions for this equation therefore infinitely many values for x

Answer:

x is any number

infinite solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3(9x+3)=3x+1

Distribute

3x+1 = 3x+1

Subtract 3x from each side

1=1

Since this is always true, x can be any value

Answer:

y = 5/3x - 14/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

Using (1,-3) and (4,2)

m = (2 - -3)/(4 - 1)

m = 5/3

Slope-intercept: y = mx + b

using (4,2)

2 = 5/3(4) + b

2 = 20/3 + b

b = 2 - 20/3 = 6/3 - 20/3 = -14/3

y = 5/3x - 14/3

Given that sample standard deviation is zero. This indicates that the variance of sample is also zero as square of sample standard deviation is sample Variance. Variance is average of the squared deviations from mean. As shown in below formula

Since Variance = 0 , we substitute in formula and we get the sum of squares of deviations of all data points from mean should be zero. This is only possible if and only if all the data points in the data distribution are same as mean of the data distribution. In the case the variance and standard deviation will be zero.

Variance = Summation n to i = 1 \(\frac{(X_{1-X} )^2}{n-1}\)

        0 = Summation n to i = 1\(\frac{(X_{1-X} )^2}{n-1}\)

                Summation n to i \({(X_{1-X} )^2\) = 0

Learn more about Variance and Standard Deviation at:

https://brainly.com/question/20251852

#SPJ4      

Three iterations are performed here to solve the system of equations using the Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) method.

To solve the system of equations using the Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) method, we need to iterate through the equations until convergence is achieved within the given tolerance.

The system of equations is:

- x + 10y - 2z = 8    (Equation 1)

y - 52 = -4           (Equation 2)

1 + 3x - y = 0        (Equation 3)

We start with the initial guesses:

x₀ = 0

y₀ = 0.9

z₀ = 1.1

Using the SOR method, the iteration formula is:

xₖ⁺¹ = (1 - ω)xₖ + (ω/a₁₁)(b₁ - a₁₂yₖ - a₁₃zₖ)

yₖ⁺¹ = (1 - ω)yₖ + (ω/a₂₂)(b₂ - a₂₁xₖ - a₂₃zₖ)

zₖ⁺¹ = (1 - ω)zₖ + (ω/a₃₃)(b₃ - a₃₁xₖ - a₃₂yₖ)

where ω is the relaxation factor, a₁₁, a₂₂, and a₃₃ are the diagonal elements of the coefficient matrix, b₁, b₂, and b₃ are the right-hand side values, and the subscripts k and k+1 represent the iteration steps.

Given:

tol = 0.05       (tolerance)

a₁₁ = 3

a₂₂ = 10

a₃₃ = 5

ω = 0.9

Let's proceed with the calculations using the SOR method:

Iteration 1:

x₁ = (1 - 0.9)(0) + (0.9/3)(8 - 10(0.9) - 2(1.1)) = 0.6

y₁ = (1 - 0.9)(0.9) + (0.9/10)(-4 - 3(0) - 5(1.1)) = 0.833

z₁ = (1 - 0.9)(1.1) + (0.9/5)(1 - 3(0) - 10(0.833)) = 1.035

Iteration 2:

x₂ = (1 - 0.9)(0.6) + (0.9/3)(8 - 10(0.833) - 2(1.035)) = 0.610

y₂ = (1 - 0.9)(0.833) + (0.9/10)(-4 - 3(0.6) - 5(1.035)) = 0.841

z₂ = (1 - 0.9)(1.035) + (0.9/5)(1 - 3(0.6) - 10(0.841)) = 1.012

Iteration 3:

x₃ = (1 - 0.9)(0.610) + (0.9/3)(8 - 10(0.841) - 2(1.012)) = 0.620

y₃ = (1 - 0.9)(0.841) + (0.9/10)(-4 - 3(0.610) - 5(1.012)) = 0.842

z₃ = (1 - 0.9)(

1.012) + (0.9/5)(1 - 3(0.610) - 10(0.842)) = 1.008

Continue these iterations until the solution converges within the given tolerance.

To know more about system of equations , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20067450

#SPJ4

To find the number that 495 is 55% of, we can use the percent proportion or percent equation.

Using the percent proportion:

Part/Whole = Percent/100

Let x be the whole (or total) number we are looking for. Then:

495/x = 55/100

We can cross-multiply to solve for x:

49500 = 55x

Dividing both sides by 55:

x = 900

Therefore, 495 is 55% of 900.

Using the percent equation:

Percent * Whole = Part

Let x be the whole (or total) number we are looking for. Then:

55% * x = 495

We can divide both sides by 0.55 to solve for x:

x = 495 / 0.55

Simplifying:

x = 900

Therefore, 495 is 55% of 900.

Answer: 55 %

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the number that $495 is 55% of, we can use the following proportion:

part/whole = percent/100

Let x be the number we are trying to find, then we can write:

495/x = 55/100

To solve for x, we can cross-multiply:

55x = 49500

Dividing both sides by 55, we get:

x = 900

Therefore, $495 is 55% of 900.

Answer:

12. x = \(\sqrt{7}\)

15. x = \(\sqrt{330}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

12. 7\(x^{2}\) = 49

\(\frac{7x^2}{7}\)= \(\frac{49}{7}\)

\(x^{2}\) = 7

\(\sqrt{x^2}\) = \(\sqrt{7}\)

x = \(\sqrt{7}\)

15. \(\frac{x^2}{3\\}\)=110

3* \(\frac{x^2}{3}\) = 110*3

\(x^{2}\) = 330

\(\sqrt{x^2}\) = \(\sqrt{330}\)

x = \(\sqrt{330}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Thanks don't forget to follow up...