a ____ is an arrangement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge in the expectation of leniency.

\(false\)

The Surpreme Court consists of 9 members and One Chief Justice and 8 associate justices.

According to Aquinas, the sinner in a scenario involving usury would be the lender, option C.

Aquinas, a prominent medieval philosopher and theologian, held a strong moral opposition to usury, which refers to the charging of interest on loans. He considered it immoral because it involved making a profit from the necessity or desperation of others, rather than from productive activities that contribute to the common good.

Aquinas believed that money should only be used as a medium of exchange and not as a means of generating income. Therefore, the lender who charges interest on a loan, exploiting the borrower's need for funds, is seen as engaging in an unethical practice. Aquinas considered usury to be a violation of justice and charity, emphasizing the importance of fairness and compassion in economic transactions. Correct option (c)

Learn more about philosopher

https://brainly.com/question/715989

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Scarcity cannot be prevented and all the needs of a country cannot be meet this is because our supply cannot meet our demand. We have an increasing population everyday of which the available resources cannot successfully cater for all the people available this makes it practically impossible to avoid scarcity.

The available ones are expensive and only people with adequate money can purchase.

Our resources are getting used up everyday this include the non renewable energy sources that cannot be replaced if used up.

A Scarcity cannot be totally prevented because the needs of a country satisfied since supply cannot meet demand.

Due to an increasing population, this created a spike of demand which put a pressure of supply of goods and services.

However, the steps that a society can take to avoid scarcity:

Read more about scarcity

brainly.com/question/24403498

Answer:

There are five leading indicators that are the most useful to follow. They are the yield curve, durable goods orders, the stock market, manufacturing orders, and building permits.

Answer:

There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.

Explanation:

If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.

Using the democracy standard, federalism can constrain democracy in five ways as democratic power , influence the policy-making process, restricts the powers of elected officials , unequal distribution , national decisions .

1. Federalism creates distinct levels of government that limit the scope of the citizens’ democratic power.
2. Federalism divides the government’s powers, making it difficult for citizens to influence the policy-making process.
3. Federalism restricts the powers of elected officials, resulting in a limited amount of citizens’ input.
4. Federalism can cause unequal distribution of resources and influence among the states, resulting in less power for citizens in some states.
5. Federalism can prevent citizens from having the same voice in national decisions that they do in state and local decisions.

For more similar questions on federalism:

brainly.com/question/12835949

#SPJ11

Answer:

it depends

Explanation:

you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.

if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.

Answer:

Danzel purchased a new stove for $500 and placed it in service in his rental house in March 2017. He elected not to claim the special depreciation allowance, and Danzel's adjusted basis including depreciation on the stove at the time of sale was $192. Danzel sold the rental house, including the stove, in October 2019. Under what property section of the Internal Revenue Code will the sale of the stove fall?

Section 179.

Section 1245.

Section 1250.

Section 1255. xxxxx

"All levels of government must be on the same page of the book" in my perspective means that all government entities must have the same level of responsibility. Maintain equality in government officials and level out the power.

Hope this helps. :3

In the given scenario, the court should proceed by excluding the evidence in its entirety. The Correct option is D.

In this case, the defendant's reputation for truthfulness and peacefulness is not directly relevant to the central issue at trial, which is whether the defendant acted in self-defense during the alleged battery incident. The neighbor's testimony about the defendant's character does not provide any direct evidence about the specific incident in question.

Therefore, the court should exclude the evidence in its entirety, as it is not relevant to the case and may potentially lead to unfair prejudice or confusion among the jury. The focus should be on the testimonies and evidence directly related to the incident and the self-defense claims made by both the defendant and the alleged victim.

Learn more about prejudice

https://brainly.com/question/31431721

#SPJ11

An example of an ethical dilemma experienced can be at school, with a colleague cheating on the test, for example, where you don't know whether to tell the teacher or protect him.

It corresponds to a situation where the individual has two options to make a decision that does not meet ethical parameters. For example in the situation where you might catch your best friend from school cheating during a test, which you know is unethical, but you are also unsure whether telling the teacher the situation would be ethical for exposing your friend.

Therefore, to solve the ethical dilemma, you could use Ethical Formalism and Kant's Categorical Imperative to make the decision about the situation, because the correct decision would be the one that brought more benefits or less consequences to the greatest number of people.

Find out more about ethical dilemma on:

https://brainly.com/question/3838938

#SPJ1

Answer:

The five requirements for becoming a naturalized U.S. Citizen:

- A basic knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of United States history and government.

- Continuous residence in the United States for at least five years.

- The ability to read, write, and speak ordinary English.

- Applicants should be at least 18 years of age at the time of filing. Certain exceptions exist, however, for the children of other permanent residents who are seeking naturalization.

- An affinity for the principles of the United States Constitution.

Answer:

This sequence of events — a soccer ball at rest, a player kicking it, and it eventually being stopped by the goal net — provides excellent illustrations for each of Newton's three laws of motion. Here's how:

1. Newton's First Law (Law of Inertia): This law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest, and an object in motion tends to stay in motion, unless acted upon by an external force. In this scenario, the soccer ball is stationary at first because no external force is acting upon it. It remains at rest until the soccer player kicks it, providing the external force necessary to change its state of motion.

2. Newton's Second Law (Law of Acceleration): This law states that the force applied to an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by its acceleration (F=ma). When the soccer player kicks the ball, they apply a force to it. The force of the kick determines the acceleration of the ball. If the player kicks the ball harder (a greater force), the ball will move faster (a greater acceleration). The mass of the ball also plays a role in this interaction - a heavier ball would require a greater force to achieve the same acceleration as a lighter one.

3. Newton's Third Law (Law of Action-Reaction): This law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. When the player kicks the ball, the force exerted by their foot on the ball (action) is met with an equal and opposite force of the ball on the player's foot (reaction). However, because the player's mass is much greater than the ball's, they don't move backward as noticeably as the ball moves forward. Similarly, when the ball hits the net and stops, this is because the net exerts an equal and opposite force on the ball, effectively absorbing and then nullifying the ball's forward motion.

No

Explanation:

Depends on what you believe, more or less. In places where freedom of speech is allowed, then no, it's not a crime because you can say whatever you want. However, just because you can do something doesn't make it right. Not a lot of people seem to understand that.

1. A void contract is a contract that lacks enforceability from the time of its creation.

A void contract is a contract that lacks enforceability from the time of its creation. It is impossible to enforce a void contract. The law does not consider void contracts to be contracts. They do not create any rights or obligations, and they cannot be enforced.

2. Free consent.

A voidable contract refers to a contract in which one party is in a position or has the right to rescind or enforce the contract when it is found out the contract contains some defects, as to the free consent. In other words, a voidable contract is one that is valid and enforceable, but it can be cancelled by one party.

3. If a contract is "illegal by statute," it means that the contract is prohibited by law.

If a contract is "illegal by statute," it means that the contract is prohibited by law. An illegal contract is one that is made for an unlawful purpose, or one that is contrary to public policy.

4. If a contract is "against public policy," it means that the contract is not in the public's best interests.

If a contract is "against public policy," it means that the contract is not in the public's best interests. Public policy refers to the principles and values that are deemed to be important to society.

5. The goods and services they need.

A minor can be bound by contracts for necessary goods and services, but not for other types of contracts. Exceptions to the minor's lack of capacity to contract are necessary to ensure that they receive the goods and services they need.

6. Three conditions

A person can only get out of an online contract by mistake if the three following conditions are met: (1) they must not have intended to enter into the contract, (2) they must not have been aware of the terms of the contract, and (3) the other party must have known or ought to have known that the person was making a mistake.

To know more about void visit:

brainly.com/question/31379921

#SPJ11

The legal system in the United States is composed of both written laws and court decision. This assertion is True.

The Constitution of the United States. The United States Constitution, which serves as the cornerstone of the federal government of the United States, is the most significant of the many codified levels of law that make up American law.

The legal system in the United States is composed of both written laws and court rulings. The laws that govern how a business acts are a reflection of previous and present ideas about what similar businesses ought to and ought not to do. The main source of law is a constitution.

To learn more about Legal System here:

https://brainly.com/question/23157938

#SPJ4

Proceedings involving the legality of a statute, laws and treaties enacted by American ambassadors and public ministers, disagreements between two or more states, admiralty law, sometimes known as maritime law.

Trial courts are placed above appellate courts so that they can examine their work and make any necessary corrections. Instead of the one judge who normally preside over a trial court, appellate courts are frequently college organizations with many justices.

As the state supreme court in the American legal system, the High Court States has the authority to rule on appeals in all matters filed in federal court or state court that involve federal law.

To know more about Appellate court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13944421

#SPJ4

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects Edward's religious tattoos. Red Robin must reasonably accommodate his beliefs unless it causes undue hardship.

Edward's religious beliefs and practices are shielded from discrimination by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Red Robin, as Edward's employer, is required by law to make a reasonable effort to respect his religious practices unless doing so would significantly interfere with Red Robin's ability to conduct business.

Edward's justification for accommodation is further bolstered by his explanation of the significance of his tattoos as an expression of his religious faith.

Red Robin ought to interact with Edward in order to discuss potential solutions like letting him wear wristbands or bracelets that cover the tattoos while he works.

Red Robin should make the requested accommodation if it can be made without posing an undue hardship in order to respect Edward's right to religious freedom, avoid violating Title VII and ensure legal compliance.

Learn more about Civil Rights Act at:

brainly.com/question/33322751

#SPJ4

Answer:

before the government may deprive someone of “life, liberty, or property.” In other words, the Clause does not prohibit the government from depriving someone of “substantive” rights such as life, liberty, or property; it simply requires that the government follow ...

The following statement summarizes the opposition to campaign finance reform, Lawmakers rely on contributions from interests and PACs and are unwilling to lose financing as a result of proposing reforms.Option C is the correct answer.

This remark emphasizes the enormous influence of interest group and political action committee (PAC) contributions on parliamentarians. It shows that MPs, who rely largely on these contributions to fund their campaigns, may be hesitant to propose and support campaign finance reform that could cut or restrict such money. The fear of losing financial support for their campaigns prevents meaningful improvements from being implemented.

Governor Patrick Cote of Vermont, who is running for president, is considering increasing donations to his primary campaign in order to decline money from the Presidential Election Campaign.

Political action committees (PACs) are organizations that raise and distribute funds to support political candidates. They might be associated with specific industry, groups of people, or causes. Governor Cote can raise his campaign donations and even exceed the Presidential Election Campaign Fund restrictions by seeking funds from PACs. This would allow him the option of declining money from the fund and instead depending on donations earned through PACs and other means.

Therefore the correct answer is option C.

For more questions on Governor

https://brainly.com/question/31310275

#SPJ8

When a plaintiff brings a lawsuit claiming harm, the court will examine the statute or regulation in question to determine if it was intended to protect against the type of harm the plaintiff has suffered.

The court will analyze the language of the statute or regulation and its legislative history to determine the purpose of the law.

Additionally, the court will look at the specific facts of the case and the harm suffered by the plaintiff to determine if it falls within the scope of protection of the law.

If the court determines that the statute or regulation was designed to protect against the type of harm suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff may have a viable claim.

However, if the court determines that the law was not intended to protect against that specific harm, the plaintiff's claim may be dismissed.

Ultimately, the court's decision will depend on a thorough analysis of the law and the specific facts of the case.

To know more about lawsuit refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28521301#

#SPJ11

Answer:

false

Explanation:

DNA evidence is useful in solving crimes but it is not easy to find at crime scenes so this is false.

Even though DNA evidence can help solve a crime faster, it is not very easy to find at crime scenes.

This is because not all can give the relevant material required for DNA testing, and there is also the issue of contamination.

Find out more on DNA evidence at https://brainly.com/question/17677132.

#SPJ2

Answer:

NIMD has joined forces with democracy support organizations from across Europe to call for support to human rights, justice and accountability in Belarus.

Explanation:

In response to grave human rights abuses and rigged elections in the country, we have signed a joint statement asking EU Member States and institutions to strengthen their commitment to human rights and democracy in Belarus. The statement came ahead of the European Council Summit on Belarus on 19 August.

Answer:

Hey mate....

Explanation:

This is ur answer.....

Cornerstones of democracy include freedom of assembly, association and speech, inclusiveness and equality, citizenship, consent of the governed, voting rights, freedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.

Hope it helps!

Brainliest pls!

Follow me! :)

In criminal law, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.

This requirement stems from the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which guarantees defendants the right to a fair and impartial trial. In order for a guilty plea to be valid, the defendant must have a full understanding of the charges against them, the consequences of their plea, and the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. Additionally, the plea must not be the result of coercion or undue influence, such as promises of leniency or threats of harm.

The judge may conduct a colloquy with the defendant, which is a series of questions aimed at ensuring that the defendant is making a voluntary and informed decision to plead guilty. If the judge determines that the plea is not knowingly entered or completely voluntary, the plea may be withdrawn and the case may proceed to trial. Overall, the requirement that a guilty plea be knowingly entered and completely voluntary is an important safeguard in the criminal justice system, as it helps to ensure that defendants are not unfairly pressured into giving up their rights.

Learn more about law :

https://brainly.com/question/29553358

#SPJ11