A period of rapid and prolonged drop in economic activity is referred to as an economic depression. Typically, during these economic depressions, there is a decline in the gross domestic product as well as notable rises in homelessness, poverty, and unemployment. The stock market would fall precipitously and there would be a sharp rise in personal and business bankruptcies during an economic slump.
An extended, severe drop in economic activity is known as an economic depression. A depression in the context of economics is typically defined to as an extreme recession lasting three years or longer. Additionally, in some years, this results in a real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) decline of at least 10%. Simply said, the worst economic conditions might result from a country experiencing a recession and failing to recover quickly.
America experienced one of the worst economic depressions in history from 1929 to 1939. History claims that the stock market crash in October 1929, which terrified Wall Street brokers and cost millions of investors, was the catalyst for the current financial crisis.
To learn more about economic depression please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/12728680
#SPJ4
The people of store age how and where they may hare lived
If I understand your question correctly, you're asking how and where people during the Stone Age lived. The Stone Age was a broad prehistoric period that lasted for millions of years. It is further divided into three main phases: the Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic periods. Each of these periods had different living conditions and housing structures. Let's explore them briefly.
Paleolithic Period: During the Paleolithic period, which began around 2.6 million years ago and lasted until about 10,000 BCE, humans were primarily hunter-gatherers. They lived in small, mobile groups and did not settle in permanent locations. Their main focus was food and shelter. Paleolithic people often lived in caves or rock shelters, using natural formations for protection from the elements. They would also construct temporary shelters using branches, animal skins, and other available materials.Mesolithic Period: The Mesolithic period, also known as the Middle Stone Age, occurred between the end of the Paleolithic period and the beginning of the Neolithic period. This was roughly from 10,000 BCE to 4,000 BCE. During this time, there was a shift toward a more settled lifestyle as humans exploited natural resources more efficiently. They continued to live in caves and rock shelters, but they also built semi-permanent settlements near rivers, lakes, and coastlines. These settlements often consisted of huts or tents made from wood, animal bones, and hides.Neolithic Period: The Neolithic period, beginning around 10,000 BCE and lasting until approximately 2,000 BCE, witnessed significant advancements in human civilization. It was characterized by the emergence of agriculture, animal domestication, and the development of pottery and more sophisticated tools. With the ability to cultivate crops and raise livestock, people established permanent settlements. Neolithic communities built houses made of mud, stone, and wood, often using timber frames and thatched roofs. These houses were larger and more durable than previous structures.It's imperative to note that living conditions during the Stone Age varied depending on geographical location and climate. In some regions, people may have lived in tents, while in others, they might have constructed elaborate communal structures. Additionally, the available resources and cultural practices of different Stone Age societies would have influenced their housing styles and ways of life.
Why is perspective especially important for an artist to consider when creating a freestanding sculpture (sculpture-in-the-round)? How can an artist create a sculpture that is interesting from many perspectives? << Read Less
Answer and Explanation:
Perspective is important for an artist because it is what allows the exact representation of what the artist wants to exhibit in terms of a three-dimensional object. Perspective is the view of the object that the artist is sculpting, in an independent sculpture it is important to show the idea behind the work of art and to allow people to understand what is being presented. The artist creates a sculpture that can be viewed from many perspectives, when he presents a work so realistic that it can be seen from any side and angle and still represent the same object in a natural way. An example of this can be seen in Michalangelo's David.
Answer:
Perspective is important for an artist because it is what allows the exact representation of what the artist wants to exhibit in terms of a three-dimensional object. Perspective is the view of the object that the artist is sculpting, in an independent sculpture it is important to show the idea behind the work of art and to allow people to understand what is being presented. The artist creates a sculpture that can be viewed from many perspectives, when he presents a work so realistic that it can be seen from any side and angle and still represent the same object in a natural way. An example of this can be seen in Michalangelo's David.
Explanation:
i used this and got 100% lol
IM A DIFFERENT BREED
What is the main purpose of the First Amendment?
The First Amendment ensures religious, speech, and assembly freedoms, as well as the right to petition.
It prohibits Congress from favoring one religion over another or from prohibiting an individual's religious activities. It protects free expression by barring Congress from suppressing the press or people' rights to talk freely. It also ensures citizens' freedom to peacefully gather and petition their government.
It safeguards five freedoms: speech, religion, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. These five guaranteed liberties make the citizens of the United States of America the most free in the world.
Before consenting to embrace the Constitution, the Founders of our democratic republic asked that these liberties be safeguarded by a constitutional amendment - the First Amendment.
The First Amendment protects us against government restrictions on our freedom of expression, but it does not preclude a private company from establishing its own standards.
The First Amendment prohibits the government from forcing you to say anything you do not want to express or from preventing you from hearing or reading others' comments (even if you never speak out yourself, you have the right to receive information).
To learn more about first amendment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3911605
#SPJ4
Why did China enter the Korean War? *
1 point
O To spread Communism through the entire Korean peninsula
A.It was asked to by the Soviet Union
B.It was attacked by the United States
C.IT felt threatened by U.S. troops on its border
Answer:
China really needed the economic and military aid promised by the Soviets. Nonetheless, Mao sent more ethnic Korean PLA veterans to Korea and made a promise to move an army closer to the Korean border.
Explanation:
what about The Tang Dynasty?
Answer:
penis penis penisnpenis penis
Explanation:
hebsudbzhs penis
HELP PLEASD
In his inaugural address on March 4, 1845 James K. Polk said, “The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government.”
In what ways did Polk’s presidency reflect this statement? In what ways did it not reflect this statement? Explain your answer in a well-constructed essay that includes specific details in support of your position.
Answer:
James K. Polk's presidency, which spanned from 1845 to 1849, reflected his statement in his inaugural address that "The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government." However, there were certain instances where his actions contradicted this statement. By examining Polk's presidency, you can discern both the ways in which his administration aligned with his statement and the instances where it deviated.
Explanation:
Polk's presidency was characterized by a strong focus on territorial expansion and the pursuit of national interests, particularly in relation to the acquisition of land. One of the most significant examples of Polk's commitment to non-military ambition was his handling of the Oregon boundary dispute with Great Britain. Rather than resorting to military action, Polk pursued a diplomatic solution and negotiated the Oregon Treaty in 1846, which established the boundary between the United States and British Canada at the 49th parallel. This resolution demonstrated Polk's preference for peaceful negotiations over military conflict. Similarly, Polk's administration was driven by the goal of acquiring territory from Mexico. Rather than pursuing an aggressive military strategy, Polk initially attempted diplomatic negotiations to secure the disputed territories. However, when these efforts failed, he authorized the use of military force. While this may appear contrary to his statement, it is important to note that Polk's military actions were primarily defensive in nature. The United States was responding to Mexican incursions and attacks, which were seen as provocations. Furthermore, Polk eventually sought a peaceful resolution by initiating peace talks with Mexico, leading to the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. This treaty secured significant territorial gains for the United States, including the territories of California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, and parts of Colorado and New Mexico. Thus, Polk's actions ultimately aligned with his claim that military ambition posed no threat to the world. However, there were instances where Polk's actions deviated from his statement. The initiation of the Mexican-American War raises questions about his commitment to avoiding military ambition. Polk's decision to provoke a conflict by sending troops into disputed territories could be seen as a departure from his peaceful intentions. While he may have believed that this was a necessary response to protect American interests, it nonetheless contradicted his inaugural address statement. Furthermore, Polk's presidency witnessed the expansionist mindset known as "Manifest Destiny," which, though not explicitly military in nature, had military implications. The idea of Manifest Destiny, which advocated for the expansion of American territory from the Atlantic to the Pacific, contributed to a sense of nationalistic fervor and provided ideological support for territorial ambitions. While Polk himself did not explicitly promote military aggression, his presidency was part of a larger context that saw the United States engage in military actions and conflicts to achieve its territorial goals.
James K. Polk's presidency largely reflected his statement that "The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government." His focus on diplomatic negotiations, demonstrated in the Oregon boundary dispute, and his pursuit of peaceful resolutions in the Mexican-American War through the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, support this claim. However, the decision to provoke the Mexican-American War and the broader context of Manifest Destiny suggest deviations from his peaceful intentions. Polk's presidency exhibited a complex interplay between non-military ambition and military actions, revealing a nuanced understanding of national interests and territorial expansion.
what made cesar chavez an effective leader?
Cesar Chavez was an effective leader due to his devotion, charismatic personality, use of nonviolent tactics, and capacity to unify people.
Cesar Chavez is seen as a significant figure in the history of the United States, particularly in terms of labor rights and Latino American history. He is renowned for his determination and leadership in fighting for farm workers' rights. Below are some of the qualities that made Cesar Chavez an effective leader:
1. Devotion: Chavez dedicated his life to serving the agricultural community and working-class individuals, and this devotion propelled him to the top of the United Farm Workers of America (UFW) union, which he co-founded.
2. Charismatic Personality: Chavez was a man of great conviction, and his charisma and passion attracted people from all walks of life, including the United States Congress, religious leaders, and Hollywood actors, to his cause.
3. Use of nonviolent tactics: Cesar Chavez was dedicated to the principles of nonviolence. He advocated for nonviolence in all forms of protest, including strikes and boycotts, and his commitment to this ideology was critical in the success of the farm workers' movement.
4. Capacity to unify people: Chavez was an expert at bringing people together, regardless of race, class, or religious beliefs, and he had a gift for finding common ground among groups who may have otherwise been at odds. This ability to unify was critical in the success of the farm workers' movement.
5. Self-sacrifice: Cesar Chavez committed his life to the cause of farm workers' rights, enduring many hardships in the process. He was willing to put his own life on the line in defense of his people, and this sacrifice earned him the respect and admiration of people worldwide.
Conclusion: Cesar Chavez's leadership was defined by his devotion, charismatic personality, commitment to nonviolence, capacity to unify people, and self-sacrifice. These qualities made him an effective leader, and his legacy as a champion of labor rights continues to inspire people worldwide.
To know more about Cesar Chavez :
https://brainly.com/question/4563612
#SPJ11
What was life like at the Residential Schools?
Answer:
Students were physically punished for speaking their Native languages. Contact with family and community members was discouraged or forbidden altogether. Survivors have described a culture of pervasive physical and sexual abuse at the schools. Food and medical attention were often scarce; many students died.
What was the relationship between Mann's ideas of education and class in society!
Mann's ideas may have empowered upper-class people to control lower- class
people.
Mann's ideas helped lower-class people receive more education.
Mann's ideas most benefited
children from lower classes.
Mann's ideas helped him teach lower-class people about morality.
The relationship between Mann's ideas of education and class in society is best represented by Mann's ideas that helped lower-class people receive more education.
Horace Mann was a prominent American educator and social reformer who believed in equal education opportunities for all children, regardless of their social class. He argued that education is the key to social and economic mobility and that it is the government's responsibility to provide free, compulsory education to all children.
Mann's ideas were influential in shaping the American public education system, which aimed to provide equal educational opportunities to all children. He believed that education was the great equalizer and that by providing equal opportunities for education, people from lower classes could rise to positions of power and influence in society. Mann's efforts resulted in the establishment of public schools and the development of teacher training programs.
Mann's ideas also helped to break down class barriers in education. Prior to Mann's reforms, education was primarily reserved for the upper class. However, his reforms opened the doors of education to all children, regardless of their social background. This led to the growth of a more educated and skilled workforce, which in turn contributed to the growth and development of the American economy.
In conclusion, Mann's ideas of education had a positive relationship with class in society, as they helped to provide equal opportunities for education and break down class barriers in education. His ideas were instrumental in shaping the American public education system, which has served as a model for other countries around the world.
Know more about Education here :
https://brainly.com/question/29479950
#SPJ11
How was the French society organized during louis xvi rule
In July of 1789, exasperated by misery and the lack of food, the population of Paris took to the streets to overturn the ruling Monarchy. The French Revolution had begun. Eighteenth-century French society was organized into three social classes, called Estates: the clergy, the nobility, and the Third Estate, made up of peasants and the bourgeoisie. The country was ruled by an absolute monarchy. Nobility and the clergy were exempted from taxes, leaving the entire fiscal burden squarely on the shoulders of the Third Estate. The bourgeoisie, made up of merchants and professionals, led the protest. They were cut out of political life, and demanded more freedom and lower taxes. The peasants were suffering, crushed by rising prices and mounting poverty.
7. How did Samuel Slater and Francis Cabot Lowell change early American industry?
A They refused to employ women and children in their textile mills.
B They created the garment district in New York City
c They built steamships to ship cloth to countries around the world.
D They opened textile mills that employed many workers.
The correct answer is D) hey opened textile mills that employed many workers.
Samuel Slater and Francis Cabot Lowell changed the early American industry in that they opened textile mills that employed many workers.
In 1813, they founded the Boston Manufacturing Company in Waltham, Massachusetts. They were wealthy businessmen that had the vision to participate in the industrial sector of the United States and opened that company that created many jobs for the American people. The company hired approximately 300 workers to produce textiles and it became one of the larges industrial plants of the country in that time.
Answer:
they opened textile mills
Explanation:
In what sense can the Crimean conflict be thought of as the first modern war?
In your own words.
Answer:
The Crimean War is sometimes called the first "modern" war, since the weaponry and tactics used had never been seen before and affected all other wars after it. It was also the first war where a telegraph was used to quickly give information to a newspaper.
Combatants: Kingdom of Sardinia; Ottoman Empire...
The Crimean War was a result of Russian pressure on Turkey; this threatened British commercial and strategic interests in the Middle East and India. France, having provoked the crisis for prestige purposes, used the war to cement an alliance with Britain and to reassert its military power
Explanation:
pls like
Help pls u will get brainliest if u use sorry i couldn’t sttach the picture or random answers will be reported
Answer: US Mexican War
Explanation:
compare and contrast the following characters from the story of the exodus. describe their interactions with one another that are significant. describe how and why they relate and respond to one another. describe the weaknesses and/or strengths that they bring into the exodus account. finally, describe what motivates them to do what they do in the story.
Pharoah was the ruler of the Egyptians; Moses was the chosen leader of the Israelites who were nurtured in the Egyptian palace.
Moses was viewed as the brave hero who had to leave his regal lineage behind and flee in order to save his people. Given that he was raised and educated in the Egyptian palace, which increased respect for his cause among the Israelites, Moses was also a very educated Israelite in Egypt, if not the most educated. Pharoah, like all other pharaohs before him, was revered as a god in Egypt. He was the most powerful person there and had the final say on state matters. was the most despised enemy. Given the aforementioned factors, it came as no surprise that both individuals respected one another and saw the other as merely a representative of his own people. Each guy was adamant about his own demands and requests, which undermined their connection because each had the interest of his people to safeguard. Nevertheless, it was still the same plight and needs of their people that gave them the perseverance to endure Moses' and Pharaoh's refusal to grant the Israelites their freedom. One can infer from how the events transpired that both men were inspired by the responsibility of leadership, which has historically been a powerful motivator for men.
To know more about the Moses visit here :
https://brainly.com/question/16695011
#SPJ4
Which Southeast Asian nation dealt with
dictatorship in the years immediately following
World War II?
Unlike the other empires, the Han Dynasty’s biggest problem came from a group within its empire. This group worked against the government in an attempt to bring peace and utopia to the empire. Instead, they weakened the government and caused instability and more rebellions. What group is discussed in this passage?
The group discussed in this passage is the rebels or dissidents within the Han Dynasty's empire who were working against the government in an effort to create a peaceful and ideal society.
Despite their intentions, their actions ultimately weakened the government and caused more instability and rebellions.
The group discussed in this passage that worked against the Han Dynasty's government, attempting to bring peace and utopia but instead causing instability and more rebellions, is most likely a faction within the dynasty itself or a religious/ideological group. Without more specific information, it is difficult to accurately identify the exact group in question. However, it is clear that this internal group contributed to the weakening of the Han Dynasty's government.
To know more about ideal society visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19706202
#SPJ11
The group causing problems from within the Han dynasty were the discontented peasants and other rebels, led by figures like Liu Bang, who became the Emperor Gaozu, and Li Zicheng, who led a peasant army.
Explanation:Based on the provided information and the context of the question, it appears that the group causing problems from within the Han dynasty were the discontented peasants and others who rebelled against the government. These include armies led by figures like Liu Bang, who became Emperor Gaozu of the newly formed Han dynasty, and Li Zicheng, who led a peasant army that eventually seized Beijing. These rebels, originating from within the empire, worked against the government with an aim to bring peace and utopia. Their rebellions, however, weakened the Han Dynasty, creating instability and inciting further rebellions.
Learn more about Han Dynasty here:https://brainly.com/question/32900240
#SPJ12
what is photosynthesis
Answer:
Any process by which plants and other photoautotrophs convert light energy into chemical energy.
Explanation:
HOPE IT HELPS.................Answer:
The process by which plants make their own food in the presence of air, water and sunlight is called photosynthesis.By this process green plants turn carbon dioxide and water into oxygen and glucose.What does the use of kamikaze pilots show about Japanese culture?
A. They hated Americans enough to die killing them.
B. They did not mind dying because they expected to lose the war.
C. They valued national honor more than individual life.
D. They were full of despair after the atomic bombs fell on Japan.
Answer:
C. They valued national honor more than individual life
Explanation:
Why were many urban factory workers supportive of the passage of the Homestead Act of 1862?
Answer:
The 1862 Homestead Act accelerated settlement of U.S. western territory by allowing any American, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land.
A claim for up to 160 acres of free federal property may be submitted by any American, even freed slaves, under the 1862 Homestead Act, which hastened the settlement of American western territory.
What is Homestead Act?Congress created the Homestead Act of 1862, which gave 160 acres of federal property to anyone who committed to farm it, in order to aid in the development of the American West and promote economic progress. Individual settlers received millions of acres of western land as a result of the act.
The Homestead Act, which was passed on May 20, 1862, hastened the settlement of the western area by awarding adult heads of families 160 acres of public property that has been surveyed in exchange for a small registration fee and five years of continuous habitation on the land.
It gave practically every man or woman a "fair opportunity" by offering claimants 160 acres of free land. Numerous Americans, including women and immigrants.
Thus, A claim for up to 160 acres of free federal property may be submitted by any American.
For more information about Homestead Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ6
which of the following events is also known as the age of reason? A.
the American Revolution
B.
the Reformation
C.
the Enlightenment
D.
the Crusades
Answer:
option A ) American revolution
Plz Answer, I’m timed
When Lincoln finally sent supplies to Fort Sumter, he used........
O heavily armed ships.
O troops from nearby forts.
O troops from distant forts.
O unarmed ships.
Answer:
he used D unarmed ships
Explanation:
Lincoln used unarmed ships to sent supplies to Fort Sumter, when Fort Sumter was attacked and was left with no supplies during 1861.
Who was Lincoln?Abraham Lincoln, a lawyer and statesman from the United States, was born on February 12, 1809, and died on April 15, 1865. He was the 16th president of the country, in office from 1861 until his death.
Lincoln is best recognized for his role as a general in the American Civil War (1861–1865) and for having signed the Emancipation Proclamation, an executive order that declared slaves to be "free."
What happened at Fort Sumter?The American military post at Fort Sumter, South Carolina, was attacked by Confederate forces on April 12, 1861. Fort succumbed less than two days later. Nobody lost their life. However, the battle marked the beginning of the Civil War, the bloodiest struggle in American history.
Supportive answer
Hence, option D is correct answer
To learn more about Unarmed ship sent by lincoln here https://brainly.com/question/27825672
#SPJ2
How do governments throughout the world differ in power distribution, the
relationship between branches, and participation?
Answer:Overview
Explain; Separation of powers is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) are kept separate. This is also known as the system of checks and balances, because each branch is given certain powers so as to check and balance the other branches.
given the problems with the articles of confederation, what changes do you think the founding fathers will make to the federal government when they meet at the constitutional convention
Based on the problems of the Articles of Confederation, two changes that the Founding Fathers will make to the federal government is:
Allowing the national government to tax.Establishing a federal court system What needed to be changed in the Articles of Confederation?The Articles of Confederation did not make for a strong enough federal government which meant that it couldn't tax and use government revenue for the benefit of the people.
The Articles also did not found a federal court system which meant that the federal government had no way of enforcing federal laws in court which undermined its purpose to protect Americans.
Find out more on the Articles of Confederation at https://brainly.com/question/13152253
#SPJ1
• Why do we stand up when the teacher enters the classroom?
• When did it start?
• Why did this custom become a rule?
• In which countries is this custom prevalent? In which countries is this absent?
What is the significance of the "Elastic Clause"?
Congress has additional unwritten powers it can exercise at any time.
Congress is not subject to the Constitution.
O Congress can do anything that a majority of its members in both houses decide to do.
Congress has the power to make all laws necessary and proper to carry out its delegated powers.
Answer: 4/D
Explanation:
A statement in the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) granting Congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper for carrying out the enumerated list of powers.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Congress has the power to make all laws necessary and proper to carry out its delegated powers.
Explanation:
i took the test
Abolitionism and Colonialism. about Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, and John Wesley. Then, write one paragraph (250 words) about either the perspective of Equiano, Douglass, or Wesley regarding slavery during Colonialism. Then, find a painting that was painted sometime between 1500 and 1800 that supports your position about the historical figure you chose and explain how that painting supports your opinion
Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, and John Wesley were prominent figures in the abolitionist movement who played crucial roles in challenging the institution of slavery during the era of Colonialism.
Olaudah Equiano, born in Africa and later enslaved, became a prominent abolitionist and writer. His autobiography, "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano," vividly described the horrors of the Middle Passage and the brutalities of slavery.
In support of Equiano's perspective, a painting from that era that resonates with his stance is "The Slave Ship" by J.M.W. Turner, painted in 1840. Although this falls slightly outside the given timeframe, it effectively captures the horrors of the transatlantic slave trade that Equiano and countless others endured.
Learn more about slavery:
https://brainly.com/question/29775358
#SPJ4
"The German armed forces on land, at sea and in the air have been completely defeated and have surrendered unconditionally and Germany, which bears responsibility for the war, is no longer capable of resisting the will of the victorious Powers. The unconditional surrender of Germany has there been affected, and Germany has become subject to such requirements as may now or hereafter be imposed upon her." What is the mostly likely title of this declaration
Explanation:
I found this from a quizlet
which of the following reflects the leader who was responsible for the great purge and the main group that was victimized by it?
RESISTED ALL EFFORTS FOR REFORM
TOTALITARIAN STATE WAS ESTABLISHED
STALIN - MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The option "Stalin - members of the Communist Party" reflects the leader who was responsible for the Great Purge and the main group that was victimized by it.
The leader who was responsible for the great purge and the main group that was victimized by it was Stalin and members of the Communist Party. Stalin resisted all efforts for reform and established a totalitarian state, which led to the victimization and persecution of many members of the Communist Party. However, it is important to note that Stalin also pursued economic development during his reign.
To know more about Communist Party, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23961689
#SPJ11
which statement best describes the nations
Answer:
A nation is a community of people formed on the basis of a common language, history, ethnicity, a common culture and, in many cases, a shared territory. A nation is a collective identity of people. A nation is more overtly political than an ethnic group; it has been described as "a fully mobilized or institutionalized ethnic group".
Explanation:
hope this helps you if it does please mark brainiest
President Polk and Mexico's leaders had many
disagreements because
Answer:
-the United States annexed Texas.
-Mexico would not sell California to the United States.
Explanation:
James Knox Polk was one of the greatest Presidents of the United States of America. He served as the 11th President of the United States of America. He was a president with a focused political agenda.
President Polk was not in favor of the Mexican leaders and he wanted to go war with Mexico to further the idea of the Manifest destiny. Polk had many disagreements with the Mexican leaders because Mexico refused to sell California to the US and also USA annexed the states of Texas. Thus there were tension in both Mexico and the USA.