anyone reply as soon as possible please

We are given two data points: (20, 132) and (30, 221). We can use these points to find the equation of the line that represents the linear function of the cost y in terms of the number of people x.

First, we need to find the slope of the line. We can use the formula:

slope = (change in y) / (change in x)

Using the two data points, we get:

slope = (221 - 132) / (30 - 20) = 89 / 10

Next, we can use the point-slope form of the equation of a line:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

where m is the slope, and (x1, y1) is a point on the line. We can use either of the two data points as (x1, y1). Let's use (20, 132):

y - 132 = (89/10)(x - 20)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

y = (89/10)x - 220/5

or

y = (89/10)x - 44

This equation gives us the cost y in terms of the number of people x.

To find the cost for 79 people, we can substitute x = 79 into the equation:

y = (89/10)(79) - 44 = 708.1

So the cost for a birthday party for 79 people would be approximately $708.10.

In ridge regression, the penalty strength parameter, represented by \lambda», controls the trade-off between fitting the training data well and keeping the model coefficients small.

When a very large penalty strength is chosen, it results in a higher degree of shrinkage of the regression coefficients towards zero. This means that the model becomes less complex and less likely to overfit the training data. However, it also means that the model may become too biased towards the null hypothesis, leading to underfitting and decreased predictive power. Therefore, choosing the right value of \lambdaλ is crucial for achieving optimal performance in ridge regression.
In ridge regression, choosing a very large λ (lambda) penalty strength results in a higher regularization effect, which helps to reduce overfitting by shrinking the coefficients of the independent variables towards zero. This helps to create a more generalized model by controlling the complexity of the model. However, choosing a λ value that is too large can also result in underfitting, as the model may become too simple to capture the underlying relationships in the data effectively.

Visit here to learn more about ridge regression:

brainly.com/question/31436095

#SPJ11

Answer:

7/12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

12:7

Step-by-step explanation:

You will get this first:

96:56

Now, divide both sides by 2

48:28

Divide by 2 again

24:14

Divide by 2

12:7

Answer:80% - 70%

Step-by-step explanation:

If the margin for the error is 5% im guessing that means 5% backwards or forwards so i believe that my answer is correct

ps if im right brainliest please

The percentage range that reflects the population's true response, considering the margin of error, is from 70% to 80%.

Given, a margin of error of 5%, we can determine the range that reflects the population's true response.

To find the range, we consider the maximum and minimum values within the margin of error.

Maximum Value: 75% + 5% = 80%

Minimum Value: 75% - 5% = 70%

Therefore, the percentage range that reflects the population's true response, considering the margin of error, is from 70% to 80%.

This means that we can be 95% confident that the actual percentage of people who would buy the product again lies within this range.

Learn more about the margin of error here:

https://brainly.com/question/29100795

#SPJ2

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

(9-1)/(8-2)

4/3

Answer:

\(\frac{4}{3}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

(2,1) (8,9)

The formula that you would use is:

\(\frac{y_{2}-{y_1} }{x_2-x_1}\)

So, 2 could be \(x_1\) and 1 could be \(y_2\)

and 8 could be \(x_2\) and 9 could be \(y_2\)

When we insert these numbers into the equation, we get:

\(\frac{9-1}{8-2}\)

When we solve that we get:

\(\frac{8}{6}\)

Now we simplify it by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2, which would give us:

\(\frac{4}{3}\)

Answer:

5:3

Step-by-step explanation:

to simplify this equation we have to find something that both numbers can be divided by

both numbers can be divided by 7

so when we divide the numbers we get

5b = 3c

so basically the ratio is 5:3

Answer:

The choice second

\(y = \frac{1}{3} \times ( \frac{1}{4} ) ^{x} \)

Step-by-step explanation:

(g. h)(-4) = g(4).h(4)

= [2(4)-1].[3(4)-1]

=7×11

=77

Triangle KVM is similar to triangle BVG because angle M = angle G = 90° and angle V is common to both triangles.

Two triangles are similar if the angles are the same size or the corresponding sides are in the same ratio.

For two triangles to be similar, the corresponding angles must be congruent i.e equal.. Also the ratio of the corresponding sides of similar triangles are equal.

angle M and G are both 90° , this means they are equal.

angle KVM = BVG

therefore angle K = angle B

Since all the corresponding angles are equal, we can say triangle KVM is similar to triangle BVG

learn more about similar triangles from

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The conditional proportions of people using their phones in the afternoon and the evening can be summarized as follows: A significant proportion of individuals use their phones both in the afternoon and evening, indicating a consistent pattern of phone usage throughout the day.

In the afternoon, many people rely on their phones for various purposes such as work, communication, entertainment, and staying connected to social media. With the advancements in technology and increased accessibility to smartphones, it has become common for individuals to utilize their phones during this time. Whether it's checking emails, browsing the internet, or engaging in social media activities, the afternoon serves as a convenient time for phone usage.

Moving on to the evening, phone usage remains prevalent as individuals unwind and engage in leisure activities. During this time, people often use their phones for entertainment purposes, such as streaming videos, playing games, or engaging in social interactions through messaging apps or social media platforms. The evening also offers a time for catching up on news, reading, or engaging in personal hobbies, which may involve the use of mobile devices.

Overall, the conditional proportions reveal that phone usage is not limited to a specific time of day but rather extends throughout the afternoon and evening. This emphasizes the significant role that smartphones play in our daily lives, providing us with a range of functionalities and opportunities for connectivity and entertainment.

To know more about phone usage patterns: brainly.com/question/30408720

#SPJ11

Similar triangles to solve this problem. The triangles formed by the post and its shadow, and the tower and its shadow, are similar because they have the same shape, but different sizes.

What is similar triangles?

In geometry, two triangles are said to be similar if they have the same shape but different sizes. This means that their corresponding angles are equal and their corresponding sides are in proportion. In other words, if we scale one triangle up or down, the resulting triangle is similar to the original.

Let's use x to represent the height of the cell phone tower. Then, we can set up the following proportion:

height of post / length of post shadow = height of tower / length of tower shadow

Substituting the given values, we get:

10 ft / 12 in = x / 124 ft

To solve for x, we need to convert the units so that they match. Let's convert 10 ft to inches:

10 ft * 12 in/ft = 120 in

Substituting this value, we get:

120 in / 12 in = x / 124 ft

Simplifying, we get:

10 = x / 124

Multiplying both sides by 124, we get:

x = 1240 / 10 = 124 ft

Therefore, the cell phone tower is 124 feet tall.

To know more similar triangles , check out :

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

In this problem, we are comparing the variances of the clock times for John and Chris in the men's 100-meter freestyle event. The coach believes that John is more consistent than Chris, and we want to test if the variance of John's time is smaller than that of Chris. We have the standard deviation values for both John and Chris, and we assume that the clock times are normally distributed for both swimmers. Using a hypothesis test, we will determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the coach's concern.

a. The null hypothesis (H₀) is that the variance of John's time is equal to or larger than the variance of Chris's time. The alternative hypothesis (H₁) is that the variance of John's time is smaller than the variance of Chris's time.
b-1. To calculate the test statistic, we use the F-test statistic formula: F = (s₁² / s₂²), where s₁² is the sample variance for John and s₂² is the sample variance for Chris. Substituting the given values, we find F = (0.86² / 1.11²).
b-2. The test statistic follows an F-distribution with (n₁ - 1) and (n₂ - 1) degrees of freedom, where n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes. Using the F-distribution table or calculator, we can find the corresponding p-value associated with the test statistic.
b-3. At α = 1%, we compare the p-value to the significance level. If the p-value is less than 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
c. The likelihood of breaking the record at the meet cannot be determined solely based on the information given in the problem. The comparison of variances does not directly relate to breaking the record.


Learn more about variances here
https://brainly.com/question/13708253



#SPJ11

The angle between vectors u and v is approximately 2.21 radians and the angle 8 between vectors 3Tu and v is |15phi/12|

First, we need to find the dot product of vectors u and v:

u · v = (-3)(5) + (-4)(0) = -15

Then, we can find the magnitudes of the vectors:

|u| = √\(((-3)^2 + (-4)^2)\)= 5

|v| = √\((5^2 + 0^2)\) = 5

Using the formula for the angle between two vectors:

cos θ = (u · v) / (|u||v|)

cos θ = (-15) / (5 * 5) = -0.6

θ = arccos(-0.6) ≈ 2.21 radians

Therefore, the angle between vectors u and v is approximately 2.21 radians.

For the second part of the question:

First, we need to find the dot product of vectors 3Tu and v:

3Tu · v = (3cos(3phi/4))(cos(phi/6)) + (3sin(3phi/4))(sin(phi/6))

3Tu · v = 3(cos(3phi/4)cos(phi/6) + sin(3phi/4)sin(phi/6))

Using the trigonometric identity cos(a-b) = cos(a)cos(b) + sin(a)sin(b), we can simplify the dot product:

3Tu · v = 3cos(3phi/4 - phi/6)

Then, we can find the magnitudes of the vectors:

|3Tu| = √(\((3cos(3phi/4))^2 + (3sin(3phi/4))^2\)) = 3√2

|v| = √(\((cos(phi/6))^2 + (sin(phi/6))^2\)) = 1

Using the formula for the angle between two vectors:

cos θ = (3Tu · v) / (|3Tu||v|)

cos θ = [3cos(3phi/4 - phi/6)] / (3√2)

cos θ = cos(15phi/12)

θ = arccos(cos(15phi/12)) = |15phi/12|

Therefore, the angle 8 between vectors 3Tu and v is |15phi/12|.

To know more about vectors refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

Answer:

n-7>-4

n-7+7>-4+7

n>-4+7

n>3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

look the inequality is the variable. 7-4=3. That means n>3

Answer:

70

Step-by-step explanation:

6x5=30

8x5=40

40+30=70

Answer:

Let the number to be determined be 'x'.

\(x+x^2 = 12\\x^2+x-12=0\\x^2+4x-3x-12=0\\x(x+4)-3(x+4)=0\\(x+4)(x-3)=0\)

∴ x = -4, x= 3

Therefore, the number is -4 or 3

The value of x is 311.14, 1527.15 and 1.61%.

Given that x = PV(1+r)^t. Assume PV=190.00, r=9.00%, and t=5.00.

Substitute the given values in the above expression, we get

x = 190(1 + 0.09) ^ 5

Simplify the above expression, we get: x = 190(1.09) ^ 5 = x = 190 × 1.63861881 = x = 311.1371749

Thus, the value of x is 311.14 (rounded to 2 decimal places).

Given that x = FV/(1+r)^t. Assume FV=3,054.00, r=9.00%, and t=8.00.

Substitute the given values in the above expression, we get: x = 3054/(1 + 0.09) ^ 8

Simplify the above expression, we get;: x = 3054/1.999675406`x = 1527.15

Thus, the value of x is 1527.15 (rounded to 2 decimal places).

Given that FV = P(1 + x) ^ t. Assume FV=1,017.00, PV=835.00, and t=6.00.

Substitute the given values in the above expression, we get: 1,017 = 835(1 + x) ^ 6

Divide both sides of the equation by 835.00, we get: 1,017/835 = (1 + x) ^ 6

Take the 6th root of both sides of the equation, we get: (1.215568862)^(1/6) = 1 + x

Simplify the above expression, we get: 1.0160907 = 1 + x = x = 1.0160907 - 1 = x = 0.0160907

Converting decimal into percentage, we get: 0.0160907 × 100 = 1.61%

Thus, the value of x is 1.61% (rounded to 2 decimal places).

To know more about compound interest, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14295570

#SPJ11

The Answer Is A

Its hard to explain but the answer is A

Answer:

  38,200,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Put the 3 in the 8th spot to the left of the decimal point and fill in the other digits to the right of it.

  38,200,000

__

The first spot immediately to the left of the decimal point has a place value of 10^0, so the location with a place value of 10^7 is the 8th spot left of the decimal point. You should be able to get the idea from the attached.

__

If you put your calculator in the appropriate display mode, it should show you the number in this form.

Answer:

Linear pairs add up to 180°

1st angle = x

2nd angle = x+24 (24° more than the first)

The equation would be

1st angle + second angle = 180 Subbing in the expressions we came up with:

x+x+24 = 180

Answer:

-2x - 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

−2x−9

I hope this helps

The size of the the matrix B if a matrix A is 5x3 and the product AB is 5x7 is B =[3x7].

Two matrices can only be multiplied if the first matrix has the same number of columns as the second matrix has. If the first matrix has dimensions of a x b and the second matrix has dimensions of c x d, then b = c and their product will have dimensions of a x d.

Let A is a 3 x 5 matrix and B is a 5 x 7 matrix

We know that matrix multiplication of A and B is possible if

Number of columns of A = Number of rows of B

Since in the given problem

Number of columns of A = Number of rows of B = 5

So the product is possible

Now the product AB is a matrix of order 3 × 7

Now the order of the product AB is 3 × 7

If a 3 x 5 matrix is multiplied by a 5 x 7 matrix then their product is a matrix of order 3 × 7.

Learn more about Matrix:

https://brainly.com/question/94574

#SPJ4

The correct answer is b) unchanged. Cutting a chocolate bar in half does not affect its density.

When a chocolate bar is cut in half, its density remains unchanged. Density is a physical property of a substance that is determined by its mass per unit volume. When the chocolate bar is cut in half, the mass is also divided into two equal parts, resulting in a reduction of the volume by half as well. Since both the numerator and denominator in the density formula change proportionally, the density remains the same.

For example, if the density of a chocolate bar is 1 gram per cubic centimeter, cutting it in half would result in two smaller bars, each with half the volume and half the mass. The density of each of the new bars would still be 1 gram per cubic centimeter, even though they are smaller in size.

Therefore, the correct answer is b) unchanged. Cutting a chocolate bar in half does not affect its density.

Learn more about density here:

https://brainly.com/question/6107689

#SPJ11

Answer:

g = 7 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

7.333... and 7 1/3 are equivalent, so just put either one.

The correct formula to calculate the surface area of the cylinder is:

\(SA = 2\pi(1.2)^2 + 1.2\pi(3.8)\)

What is cylinder?

A cylinder is a three-dimensional geometric shape that consists of a circular base and a curved surface that is formed by a set of parallel lines that are equidistant from the base. The base can be a circle, and the cylinder can have different heights.

To find the surface area of a cylinder, we use the formula:

\(SA = 2\pi r^2 + 2\pi rh\)

where r is the radius of the base of the cylinder, h is the height of the cylinder, and π is pi (approximately 3.14).

The diameter of the cylinder is given as 2.4 centimeters, so the radius (r) is half of that, which is 1.2 centimeters. The height of the cylinder is given as 3.8 centimeters.

Therefore, the correct formula to calculate the surface area of the cylinder is:

\(SA = 2\pi(1.2)^2 + 1.2\pi(3.8)\)

This simplifies to:

SA = 2π(1.44) + 4.56π

SA = 2.88π + 4.56π

SA = 7.44π

Finally, to find the amount of wrapping paper needed, we multiply the surface area by the number of cylinders we need to cover.

To learn more about cylinder visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30390407

#SPJ1

The results of the quadratic equation x² + p · x + q = 0 with real coefficients are:

Case A: p · q

Case B: (5 · p) / (2 · q) - 8

Case C: (3 / 2) · (p² - 4 · q)

Case D: 5 · p² - 11 · q

Herein we find a quadratic equation of the form x² + p · x + q = 0, where p, q are real coefficients, and whose roots are α, β. The values of the coefficients are described by these expressions:

p = - α - β, q = α · β

Now we proceed to determine α and β in terms of p and q:

p = - α - q / α

p · α = - α² - q

α² - p · α + q = 0

α = p / 2 ± (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)

p = - q / β - β

p · β = - q - β²

β² - p · β + q = 0

β = p / 2 ± (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)

Then,

α = p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q), β = p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)

Finally, we proceed to solve on each expression:

Case A

[p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]² · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] + [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]²

[p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)] · [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] + [p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)] · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]

[p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)] · p

p³ / 4 - (p / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)

p³ / 4 - p³ / 4 + p · q

p · q

Case B

[p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] / [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] + [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] / [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]

[[p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]² + [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]²] / [p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)]

[p² / 4 + (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q + p² / 4 - (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q] / [p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)]

(p² / 2 + 2 · p² - 8 · q) / q

(5 · p² / 2 - 8 · q) / q

(5 · p) / (2 · q) - 8

Case C

(α - β)²

α² - 2 · α · β + β²

[p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]² - 2 · [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] + [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]²

p² / 4 + (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q - 2 · [p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)] + p² / 4 - (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q

5 · p² / 2 - 8 · q - p² / 2 - (1 / 2) · (p² - 4 · q)

2 · p² - 8 · q - (1 / 2) · (p² - 4 · q)

2 · p² - 8 · q - (1 / 2) · p² + 2 · q

3 · p² / 2 - 6 · q

3 · (p² / 2 - 2 · q)

(3 / 2) · (p² - 4 · q)

Case D

(2 · α + β) · (α + 2 · β)

(2 · α + β) · α + (2 · α + β) · (2 · β)

2 · α² + α · β + 4 · α · β + 2 · β²

2 · α² + 5 · α · β + 2 · β²

2 · [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]² + 5 · [p / 2 + (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)] + 2 · [p / 2 - (1 / 2) · √(p² - 4 · q)]²

2 · [p² / 4 + (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q] + 5 · [p² / 4 - (1 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q)] + 2 · [p² / 4 - (1 / 2) · p · √(p² - 4 · q) + p² - 4 · q]

p² / 2 + p · √(p² - 4 · q) + 2 · p² - 8 · q + 5 · p² / 4 - (5 / 4) · (p² - 4 · q) + p² / 2 - p · √(p² - 4 · q) + 2 · p² - 8 · q

p² + 4 · p² - 16 · q + 5 · p² / 4 - (5 / 4) · p² + 5 · q

5 · p² - 11 · q

To learn more on quadratic equations: https://brainly.com/question/30980124

#SPJ1

The value of angle QBO is 12°

Similar triangles have the same corresponding angle measures and proportional side lengths. The corresponding angles of similar triangles are congruent.

Also the ratio of corresponding sides of similar triangles are equal.

The triangle similarity criteria are: AA (Angle-Angle) SSS (Side-Side-Side) SAS (Side-Angle-Side).

Therefore,

2x + 6 = 4x -12

4x - 2x = 12 + 6

2x = 18

x = 9

Since angle QBO = 3x -15

= 3(9) -15

= 27 - 15

= 12

Therefore, angle QBO is 12

learn more about similar triangles from

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

I’m like 90% sure it’s D ‍♀️

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Domain is how far the graph goes left to right.

The left arrow goes left into -infinity forever

The right arrow goes down and to the right forever, into infinity

Answer:

(879,120)÷(56709072) ×(-659340)=-10221.274

Step-by-step explanation:

we use bedmas rules when it comes to long solving questions.