defonition of caste system

Einhard's "The Life of Charlemagne" presents a highly idealized and sanitized portrait of Charlemagne as the perfect king.

Einhard's "The Life of Charlemagne" presents Charlemagne as an ideal king who was a model of piety, justice, and learning. Einhard portrays Charlemagne's military campaigns, his rule over his vast empire, his patronage of learning and the arts, and his personal life as an example of what a king should be.

One example of Einhard's "public relations spin" is his description of Charlemagne's personal life. Einhard writes, "He lived a sober life and ate and drank frugally. " (Chapter 19) This portrays Charlemagne as a virtuous and discipline ruler, in contrast to the excesses of other kings of the time. Einhard also emphasizes Charlemagne's piety, writing, "he devoted himself to the regular performance of the church's offices and listened attentively to the reading of the Scriptures." (Chapter 20) This reinforces the idea that Charlemagne was a devout Christian ruler who led by example.

Learn more about discipline here:

https://brainly.com/question/28325869

#SPJ11

Einhard's "The Life of Charlemagne" presents a highly idealized and sanitized portrait of Charlemagne as the perfect king.

Einhard's "The Life of Charlemagne" presents Charlemagne as an ideal king who was a model of piety, justice, and learning. Einhard portrays Charlemagne's military campaigns, his rule over his vast empire, his patronage of learning and the arts, and his personal life as an example of what a king should be.

One example of Einhard's "public relations spin" is his description of Charlemagne's personal life. Einhard writes, "He lived a sober life and ate and drank frugally. " (Chapter 19) This portrays Charlemagne as a virtuous and discipline ruler, in contrast to the excesses of other kings of the time. Einhard also emphasizes Charlemagne's piety, writing, "he devoted himself to the regular performance of the church's offices and listened attentively to the reading of the Scriptures." (Chapter 20) This reinforces the idea that Charlemagne was a devout Christian ruler who led by example.

Learn more about discipline here:

https://brainly.com/question/28325869

#SPJ11

William Penn banned "swearing" in his Pennsylvania colony.

William Penn was a religious man who believed that his colony, Pennsylvania, should reflect his beliefs. Penn was well-known for his Quaker beliefs, which dictated that people should speak the truth at all times.

Penn believed that the use of obscenities and curses was a sign of a wicked person or that the speaker had no moral compass.

Therefore, he banned the usage of swearing to make sure that the colony would remain morally upright. He also believed that anyone who used obscenities or curses was simply uneducated and lacked the vocabulary to express themselves better. Hence, banning swearing was seen as a way to boost the moral fibre of the colony.

For more such answers on William Penn

https://brainly.com/question/14112144

#SPJ8

Answer:

The economy continued to grow because of the prosperity of war time success, and mass projects like dams, which increased production and jobs in the area.

Answer: The correct answer to your question is D. help businesses that employ workers within the country

Explanation: Enjoy

The most significant goal of the Civil Rights Movement was to secure equal rights and opportunities for African Americans.

That goal was partially accomplished through significant achievements such as the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which contributed to desegregation, the prohibition of racial discrimination, and the protection of voting rights.

However, full accomplishment of the goal has not been achieved, as systemic racism and social inequalities persist, highlighting the need for ongoing progress and activism to address these issues and achieve true equality for all.

The most significant goal of the Civil Rights Movement was to secure equal rights and opportunities for African Americans, including desegregation and an end to systemic racism and discrimination. This goal was partially accomplished as a result of the movement, with landmark achievements such as the Brown v. Board of Education decision leading to the desegregation of schools, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibiting discrimination based on race, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 protecting the right to vote.

However, the goal of fully eradicating racism and achieving true equality for all has not been completely realized, as systemic racism and social inequalities persist in various forms, highlighting the ongoing need for further progress and activism.

The complete question:

Learn more about  Civil Rights Movement here

https://brainly.com/question/131269

#SPJ11

He appeared before House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1955, which eventually led to his conviction (and subsequent appeal) on charges of contempt of Congress.

The correct answer is option (b) Un-American Activities. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) was established in 1938 to investigate alleged subversive activities and Communist influence in the United States. During the height of the Cold War, the committee conducted hearings and interrogations targeting individuals suspected of having Communist sympathies or involvement in leftist organizations.

Pete Seeger, a folk singer and activist known for his progressive views, was called to testify before the committee regarding his political affiliations. Seeger refused to answer certain questions and was subsequently charged with contempt of Congress.

The case sparked debates about civil liberties and freedom of speech, and Seeger's conviction was later overturned on appeal.

To learn more about Un-American Activities click here : brainly.com/question/1130666

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct answer is B

The demand for watching women's soccer decreased

1) is not fixed like the land is in the agricultural production function.

2) Due to rapid increases in factors like physical capital, education, and skills, lead to a breakdown in Malthus's logic.

1) First, physical capital is not fixed like the land is in the agricultural production function. Second, labor in manufacturing and services is not only a function of man hours as in the agricultural sector, but also a function of the education and skills of workers.

The industrial revolution led to new methods of production and increases in productivity . The industrial revolution led to consistent and quick rises in all three factors.

2) We assumed that in the steady-state productivity, land, and number of hours worked per worker were constant. However, the industrial revolution brought to a quick rise in physical capital, worker education and skill levels, new production techniques, and increased productivity. These lead to the breakdown of the steady-state assumption in our simple Malthus model, as the increase in factors outpaced the slower Malthusian forces.

Read more on Industrial Revolution:

https://brainly.com/question/24206869

#SPJ4

Based on the productive capabilities of both countries, if they decided to trade 1 ton of cheese for 3 tons of fish with each other, this trade would be advantageous to both countries.

The Opportunity cost of fish in France is:

= 40/80

= 0.5 tons of Cheese

The Opportunity cost of fish in Japan is:

= 50/200

= 0.25 Cheese

If France can therefore get 3 tons of fish and only have to give 1 ton of cheese, then the trade would benefit both countries because France would get more fish than they can produce for 1 ton of cheese.

Find out more on advantageous trade at https://brainly.com/question/25541041

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. The written and spoken languages were exactly the same.

Explanation:

The Chinese language is the oldest written language in the world with at least six thousand years of history. Chinese character inscriptions have been found in turtle shells dating back to the Shang dynasty1 (1766-1123 BC) proving the written language has existed for more than 3,000 years.

Answer:

He disregarded an order and returned to Yorktown Peninsula.

Explanation:

Answer:

What crucial mistake did British General Cornwallis make that led to the defeat of the British army? He disregarded an order and returned to Yorktown Peninsula.

Explanation:

Although children may no longer search for reindeer on Christmas Eve, your tween may be ready to accept Santa Claus and spread the pleasure of giving in their own unique way.

There is no fixed age when children should know the truth about Santa Claus, according to Laura Lamminen, Ph.D., a pediatric psychologist at Children's Health. Every household, according to Dr. Lamminen, will have children who are ready to talk about Santa at various ages.

It is always a good idea to tell the truth if you can because research suggests that children who are told lies by their parents are more inclined to tell lies themselves. Don't utilize Santa as a means of energizing your child. It's good to allow kids to develop via fantasy and imagination.The average age at which children abandon believing in Santa Claus is eight, according to numerous polls and studies from the United States and other Western nations.

To learn more about Santa clause refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/30064670

#SPJ4

The Homo Sapiens' lighter, less muscled body type led to its success because this made the species to be more agile and needed fewer calories to survive.

In general the Homo Sapiens is smaller if compared to other animals such as tigers, elephants, etc. who seem to be more fierce than humans. Moreover, if compared to other hominis such as gorillas, the human body is less muscles.

Despite this, humans have a bigger brain and seem to have better skills at surviving than other species.

This is possible because this type of body made humans to be more agile as they could move faster. Moreover, a smaller body implied humans did not need as much food, water, etc. to survive.

Learn more about the Homo Sapiens in: https://brainly.com/question/10169640

#SPJ1

Answer:

First answer.

Explanation:

Because all of its values are least.

Answer:

Ghana (First answer)

Explanation:

This statement "All Korean words have two forms, one plain and the other honorific. The honorific forms are to be used for an adult equal or senior, whereas the plain forms are used for a junior or child" is False.

The Korean language has a unique feature known as speech levels, which is determined by the social status of the person one is addressing. They use these language forms when communicating with others who have a higher or lower social status in Korea, and it's called honorifics and plain forms. Both forms have different uses.The speech levels include six different levels that denote the speaker's level of politeness, with a particular level used based on the rank and status of the person being addressed, as well as the context and situation in which they are being addressed.

The six different levels are as follows:Haeyo-che (하게체)Hae-che (해체)Hae-yo-che (해요체)Haera-che (하려고체)Hae-syo-che (해세요체)Honorifics or Jing-che (존댓말)The use of language forms in Korea is determined by social hierarchy, status, age, and intimacy with the individual being addressed. In this way, the Korean language recognizes the importance of the speaker-listener relationship in communication and uses the appropriate language form to communicate effectively.

To know more about Korean click here:

https://brainly.com/question/984367

#SPJ11

A key moment in the history of women in the 1960s was "All of the above" mentioned options.

In the 1960s, the history of women saw many key moments.

These included Eleanor Roosevelt's founding of new feminist organizations, the publication of Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique, and the election of many new congresswomen.

All of these had a profound impact on the fight for gender equality in the United States and around the world. These events were the catalyst for a wave of change that continues today.

To know more about gender equality click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28482048#

#SPJ11

Title: The Roman Empire: The Greatest Civilization

Introduction:

The Roman Empire is widely regarded as one of the greatest civilizations in history. Its achievements in various domains, including governance, engineering, and cultural influence, have left an indelible mark on the world. This essay will provide evidence and citations to support the claim that the Roman Empire stands as the pinnacle of human civilization.

Body Paragraph:

The Roman Empire's governance system was an exemplary model of efficient administration. The establishment of a complex bureaucracy and the implementation of laws, such as the Twelve Tables, ensured stability and order throughout the empire. The historian Polybius, in his work "The Histories," praised the Roman Republic's system of checks and balances, which provided a degree of political representation for its citizens. The success of their governance can be seen in the longevity of the empire, which spanned over centuries and continued to influence subsequent civilizations.

Body Paragraph:

The engineering marvels of the Roman Empire further demonstrate its greatness. The construction of magnificent structures, such as the Colosseum, the aqueducts, and the roads, showcased their advanced engineering skills. The Roman aqueducts, in particular, highlight their mastery of hydraulic engineering. These structures, like the Pont du Gard in France, not only provided water supply to cities but also served as impressive feats of architecture. The Roman road network, famously known as the "Viae Romanae," connected distant parts of the empire, facilitating trade, communication, and military campaigns. These engineering achievements have continued to inspire and influence architectural and infrastructure development throughout history.

Counterargument Paragraph:

While some may argue that other civilizations, such as Ancient Greece or Ancient Egypt, were equally significant, the Roman Empire's extensive cultural influence sets it apart. Roman culture, heavily influenced by the Greeks, encompassed art, literature, and philosophy. The adoption and adaptation of Greek artistic styles, evident in Roman sculptures and mosaics, exemplify their cultural synthesis. Furthermore, the spread of Latin as the lingua franca and the establishment of Roman law, as seen in the Justinian Code, contributed to the legal and linguistic foundations of Western civilizations. The Roman Empire's cultural impact transcended its borders and laid the groundwork for the development of European culture.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Roman Empire's significance and greatness can be attributed to its effective governance, remarkable engineering accomplishments, and extensive cultural influence. The establishment of a stable and efficient administrative system, coupled with awe-inspiring engineering feats, exemplifies their mastery of infrastructure and technology. Moreover, their cultural assimilation and dissemination influenced subsequent civilizations for centuries to come. With evidence and citations supporting these claims, it becomes apparent that the Roman Empire stands as the greatest civilization in human history, leaving an enduring legacy that continues to shape the world today.

Your welcome btw I saw this question somewhere else but they took the question down and I already had it all done so here it is!

**Introduction**

The Roman Empire was one of the most influential civilizations in history. It lasted for over 400 years and covered much of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. The Romans made many important contributions to the world, including advances in law, government, engineering, architecture, and literature.

**Body Paragraph 1**

One of the most important contributions of the Roman Empire was its legal system. The Romans developed a system of law that was based on the principles of fairness and justice. This system of law was so successful that it is still used in many countries today.

**Evidence:**

* The Roman legal system was based on the principle of **_res judicata_**, which means that a case can only be tried once. This principle ensures that people are not tried twice for the same crime.

* The Romans also developed the concept of **_habeas corpus_**, which means that a person cannot be imprisoned without being charged with a crime. This principle protects people from being held in jail without a reason.

**Body Paragraph 2**

The Roman Empire also made significant contributions to government. The Romans developed a system of government that was based on the principles of **_separation of powers_** and **_checks and balances_**. This system of government is still used in many countries today.

**Evidence:**

* The Roman government was divided into three branches: the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. Each branch had its own powers and responsibilities, and no one branch could become too powerful.

* The Romans also developed the concept of **_impeachment_**, which is a process by which a government official can be removed from office. This process helps to ensure that government officials are accountable to the people.

**Counterargument**

Some people might argue that the Roman Empire was not the greatest civilization because it was responsible for slavery and other forms of oppression. However, it is important to remember that the Roman Empire was a product of its time. Slavery was common in many parts of the world at that time, and the Romans were not the only ones wh9no practiced it.

**Conclusion**

Despite its flaws, the Roman Empire was a great civilization that made many important contributions to the world. Its legal system, government, and engineering are still used today, and its culture has had a profound impact on Western civilization.

**Overall, the Roman Empire was a great civilization that made many important contributions to the world. It is a testament to the ingenuity and creativity of the Roman people that their empire lasted for over 400 years and covered much of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East. The Romans left a lasting legacy that continues to influence the world today.**

bardAI

Answer:The Industrial Revolution changed the world by transforming business, economics, and society. These shifts had major effects on the world and continue to shape it today. Before industrialization, most European countries had economies dominated by farming and artisan crafts such as hand-woven cloth.

Explanation:

Answer:

Native Americans and pioneers

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Henry Morton Stanley had help lobby officials to support Leopold's actions in Congo. This led to U.S. recognition of Leopold's hold on Congo in 1884.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

it says facts

Answer: Its b

Explanation: Well french were really liked power and wanted to control other countries, they control that had no power and control.

Border ruffians are the proslavery settlers who came to Kansas from Missouri in the 1800s were known as abolitionists.

who was Border ruffians?

Considered one among a set of proslavery Missourians throughout the duration from 1854 till the start of the Civil War who used to go the border into Kansas to vote illegally, make raids, and intimidate the antislavery settlers.

How did border ruffians effect Kansas?

Border ruffians helped to steady a proslavery legislature in Kansas, which drafted a proslavery charter referred to as the Lecompton Constitution. Meanwhile, anti-slavery activists installed an extra-legal regime in their very own primarily based totally in Topeka. John Brown, c. 1856.

To know more about border ruffians, click here- brainly.com/question/3128951

#SPJ4

The defeat of American Indian people by United States troops prompted Chief Joseph to give the speech " I Will Fight No More Forever".

The Wallowa band of the Nez Perce Tribe was led by Chief Joseph (1840–1904), who rose to fame in 1877 after taking his people on a daring trip over the Rocky Mountains. He was born in 1840, and The name Joseph was given to him by Reverend Henry H. Spalding who had founded a mission among the Nez Perce in 1836. Nez Perce War Chief Joseph was aware that his little tribe of 800 members and 200 warriors couldn't stand a chance against the American military. He started to retreat in an effort to save his people. He intended to reach Canada, where he would meet Sitting Bull's Sioux tribe.

The Nez Perce War is the name given to Chief Joseph's withdrawal. It is frequently cited as one of the greatest military retreats in history. Chief Joseph led his tribe 1,400 miles and fought fourteen battles against the considerably larger and better armed American army with just 200 warriors. Eventually, though, he ran out of food and blankets, and many of his troops were dead. On October 5, 1877, he was almost at the Canadian border when he was forced to give up.

To know more about Chief Joseph, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28148098

#SPJ13

The complete question is given below :

What event in the history of the West in the late 1800s prompted Chief Joseph to give this " I Will Fight No More Forever" speech?

Answer:

Both revolts were against monarchs and involved tax policies.

Explanation:

The French Revolution was a revolution that started on the 5th of May, 1789 and ended on the 9th of November, 1799 at the kingdom of France.

Basically, the revolution was centered around the decision made by the French citizens to redesign and restructure their political landscape and leadership styles and as such led to the abolishment of the feudal system (Ancien Regime) and absolute monarchy. Also, this revolution caused a lot of political turmoil and chaotic bloodbath leading to the death of King Louis XVI and his wife Marie Antoinette in the month of January, 1793.

The American Revolutionary War was a war of independence of the United States of America that was fought between the 19th of April, 1775 and 3rd of September, 1783. The war started when the delegates from the thirteen (13) American colonies in Congress (First continental congress) revolted against the Great Britain over their lack of representation in the colonies and refusal to give consent to parliament's taxation such as Stamp Act and Townshend Acts.

Hence, the similarity between the French and American Revolutions is that both revolts were against monarchs and involved tax policies.

The War in Ukraine has had significant implications for the global financial order. Economic sanctions, currency volatility, disruptions in energy markets, changes in investment and capital flows, heightened geopolitical risk perception, and the role of international financial institutions are among the key factors that have been influenced by the conflict.

The War in Ukraine, which began in 2014, has had significant implications for the global financial order. The conflict between Ukraine and Russia, along with the subsequent geopolitical tensions, has resulted in various economic and financial repercussions that have reverberated beyond the region. In this essay, we will explore the ways in which the global financial order has been affected by the war.

Economic Sanctions: One of the most notable impacts of the conflict has been the imposition of economic sanctions on Russia by the United States, European Union, and other countries. These sanctions targeted key sectors of the Russian economy, including banking, energy, and defense. The aim was to put pressure on Russia to cease its involvement in Ukraine. These sanctions had a significant impact on the global financial order as they restricted Russia's access to international capital markets, limited foreign investments in Russia, and created a climate of uncertainty for global investors.

Currency Volatility: The War in Ukraine also contributed to increased currency volatility, particularly for the Ukrainian hryvnia and the Russian ruble. The conflict and the economic instability it caused led to depreciation in the value of these currencies. The devaluation of the Russian ruble, in particular, had ripple effects across global financial markets, as it affected trade flows, investment decisions, and currency exchange rates.

Energy Markets: Ukraine is a crucial transit country for Russian natural gas exports to Europe. The conflict raised concerns about the security of energy supplies and disrupted gas flows, leading to price fluctuations in global energy markets. The tensions between Ukraine and Russia highlighted the vulnerability of energy supply chains and prompted discussions about diversification and reducing dependence on Russian energy sources. This led to increased efforts to develop alternative energy routes and sources, impacting the global energy landscape and investment patterns in the sector.

Investment and Capital Flows: The War in Ukraine and the resulting geopolitical tensions created an environment of uncertainty, which affected investment and capital flows. Foreign investors became more cautious about investing in the region, leading to a decline in foreign direct investment (FDI) in Ukraine and neighboring countries. The risk perception associated with the conflict also affected the pricing of sovereign debt and increased borrowing costs for countries in the region. Moreover, capital flight from Ukraine and Russia occurred as investors sought safer havens for their investments, impacting both domestic and international financial markets.

Geopolitical Risk: The conflict in Ukraine highlighted the geopolitical risks associated with investing in emerging markets and the potential for conflicts to spill over into neighboring regions. This led to a reevaluation of risk assessments and investment strategies by global investors. Geopolitical considerations became an essential factor in investment decision-making, with increased attention to political stability, security, and regional dynamics.

International Financial Institutions: The War in Ukraine prompted international financial institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, to provide financial assistance and support to Ukraine. These institutions played a crucial role in stabilizing the Ukrainian economy and implementing structural reforms. The conflict also led to discussions within these institutions about the need for enhanced risk assessment frameworks and tools to address geopolitical risks in their lending and support programs.

In conclusion, The war served as a reminder of the interconnectedness of global financial systems and the potential for localized conflicts to have far-reaching consequences. As geopolitical tensions persist, it is essential for policymakers, investors, and international institutions to carefully monitor and manage the risks arising from such conflicts to maintain stability in the global financial order.

To know more about War in Ukraine, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/27695392#

#SPJ11

The federal act that revealed a flaw in the system of popular sovereignty was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.

This act, proposed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas, aimed to organize the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and determine their stance on slavery through popular sovereignty.

Which allowed the residents of the territories to decide whether they would allow or prohibit slavery.

However, the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to significant controversy and ultimately exposed the flaw in the concept of popular sovereignty.

The act repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had established a dividing line across the Louisiana Purchase territory, with slavery prohibited north of the line (except for the state of Missouri) and allowed south of it.

The act's provision of popular sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska led to intense conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers who flooded into the region to influence the territorial legislature.

This resulted in a series of violent clashes, known as "Bleeding Kansas," where both sides engaged in armed conflicts and political maneuvering to gain control.

The flaw in popular sovereignty became evident as the process of determining slavery's fate through democratic means resulted in an escalation of violence and a breakdown of law and order.

The act did not provide adequate safeguards or mechanisms to ensure fair and peaceful decision-making, leading to widespread fraud, voter intimidation, and irregularities during elections.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act contributed to the deepening sectional divide between the North and the South and further intensified the debate over slavery, ultimately fueling the events that led to the American Civil War.

The act demonstrated that popular sovereignty alone was insufficient to address the contentious issue of slavery, as it failed to prevent violence and effectively resolve the conflict between opposing factions.

To know more about federal act refer here

brainly.com/question/24924382#

#SPJ11