Democratic governments of them controls the_____________ of power by limiting the powers of government officials.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

because only the nominated ones are eligible to vote

Maya should not post these photos for several reasons. Firstly, the photos may contain information that could be considered sensitive. As the holiday party took place at the police department, there may be certain aspects of the event that should remain confidential or not be shared publicly. This could include details about the police department's operations, protocols, or internal dynamics. Posting such sensitive information could compromise the security and integrity of the department.

Secondly, if there are people in the images that Maya isn't friends with, it would be respectful to consider their privacy and seek their consent before sharing their images online. People may have different preferences regarding their online presence, and it is important to respect their boundaries and rights.

Thirdly, the fact that Maya isn't in uniform during the party raises questions about the appropriateness of posting these images. If Maya is not in uniform, it may be more difficult for viewers to distinguish between personal and official contexts. This could potentially blur the lines between her personal and professional life, which may not be desirable or appropriate.

Lastly, Maya should consider the potential audience of her social media profile. Citizen journalists or individuals with various intentions might come across the images. It is important to be mindful of how these images could be interpreted or misused by others. Maintaining a level of discretion and professionalism when sharing content related to work events is crucial.

Overall, Maya should exercise caution and discretion when deciding whether or not to post these photos. Respecting the sensitivity of the information, obtaining consent, considering the context, and being mindful of potential viewers are all important factors to consider in order to avoid any unintended consequences.

for more questions on department

https://brainly.com/question/30678414

#SPJ11

Answer:

a jury

Explanation:

Answer:

conviction

If helpful pls give 5 star, brainliest, and thanks!

Answer:

attach a picture please, I can answer accurately that way.

Explanation:

but, It means you have correct data that can help

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.

Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.

This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.

To learn more about evidence

https://brainly.com/question/23323608

#SPJ1

Answer:

The sheriff was always the leading lawman in those days.

Explanation:

Towns in those days were very small and consisted of little authority, leaving the chief of police, or sheriff, the leading lawman.

Answer:

sheriff

Explanation:

The sheriff was the police captian for the town/village  

Instead of mashing on the gas pedal while climbing drive up slowly

Answer:

The highest possible longevity

Explanation:

They encourage political engagement, act as a primary indicator for voters to make informed decisions, and plan Congress and government activities.

Economic growth will occur where there is political stability, according to an analysis of the link between the two. According to all economists, states with strong economies and stable political systems exhibit quicker growth than those with unstable economies.

Political stability is described in our study as the view of the likelihood that the government would be toppled or destabilized by unlawful or violent means, such as domestic terrorism and violence. Political stability allows for the advancement and attainment of the goals set forth in the formulation of a given political superior dispensation's policies, whereas political instability causes conflict in the application of laws and policies.

To know more about stability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29696038

#SPJ1

Answer:

60 u believe

Explanation:

if im wrong let me know

The part of the budget that county and city governments have no direct control over as it is a requirement of law is: the debt service.

The repayment of the principal and interest on any loans or outstanding obligations that the government has undertaken is referred to as debt service. These debts are frequently issued to fund capital investments like public buildings or infrastructure projects.

Therefore, county and municipal governments are required by law to set aside a specific amount of their budget for debt service payments, and they have little leeway to change or lower those payments.

Learn more about debt service here:https://brainly.com/question/31325359

#SPJ1

Leaving the classroom without asking is a safety issue that should be taken seriously.

Leaving the classroom without asking is a safety issue for several reasons. Firstly, it compromises the overall security of the school environment. By allowing students to freely leave without permission, it becomes easier for unauthorized individuals to enter the premises unnoticed, posing a potential threat to the safety of everyone inside.

Secondly, in the event of an emergency such as a fire, earthquake, or lockdown, it is crucial for students and teachers to remain accounted for. If students are permitted to leave without proper authorization, it becomes difficult to ensure everyone's well-being and evacuate them efficiently. This lack of control can lead to chaos and potentially exacerbate the dangers of the situation.

Furthermore, when students leave the classroom without permission, it disrupts the learning environment and can distract other students. It undermines the authority of the teacher and sets a precedent that it is acceptable to disregard rules and regulations. This can create a culture of noncompliance, making it harder for teachers to maintain discipline and ensure a conducive learning atmosphere.

In conclusion, leaving the classroom without asking is not just a matter of discipline but a genuine safety concern. By enforcing strict protocols and emphasizing the importance of seeking permission, schools can prioritize the well-being of their students and maintain a secure learning environment.

For more such questions on safety, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/21082629

#SPJ8

Explanation:

Current trends in the United States show strong support for capital punishment.  In the last 20 years, support for the death penalty has never dropped below 57 percent in opinion polls. In a few polls, it has reached as high as 80 percent. During the 1990s, two states (New York and Kansas) decided to reinstate the death penalty, while no state abolished it. The death penalty has broad popular support.

Any death-penalty law and case must meet constitutional standards. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbids “cruel and unusual punishments.” The Fifth and 14th amendments require “due process of law.” The 14th Amendment also promises “equal protection of the laws.” The Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant a fair trial. Any defendant can appeal a death sentence on these or other grounds. Appeals courts scrutinize death-penalty cases to make sure proper procedures and constitutional standards have been followed.

The highest appeals court is the U.S. Supreme Court. This court has the final say on matters of U.S. constitutional law. It has made several landmark rulings on death-penalty cases.

Economics is used by governments to make judgements about resource allocation and policy. A framework for evaluating different possibilities and selecting the most practical and efficient ways to achieve policy objectives is provided by economics.

Because it offers a framework for debating and resolving significant societal issues, economics is crucial in government affairs. Governments may make wise judgements about how to distribute resources, manage the economy, and handle significant policy challenges by applying economic concepts and instruments. For instance, economics may assist governments in determining the best strategy to combat poverty, provide employment, and stimulate economic growth. The greatest approaches to strike a balance between conflicting interests and objectives may be found by analyzing the effects of tax laws, trade agreements, and regulations on the economy. Furthermore, economics offers crucial insights into how markets operate and how the government affects market results.

To learn more about economics visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/14355320

#SPJ1

The substance is (you need to give only one name): Carbon monoxide

2. a. The Guide number that should be consulted for more information is: 115

b. The Guide title is "Carbon Monoxide"

3. The distance to allow for each of the following (feet or miles) is: 1/2-mile

a. Isolation

b. Evacuation

4. The primary hazard is due to:

a. Health

b. Fire

5. Major fire or explosion hazards due to this type of material are (list up to three): None listed in Guide 115

6. Potential health effects from exposure to this material are (list up to three): Headache, dizziness, nausea

7. The respiratory protection that is recommended for responses to this material is Self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)

A hazardous material incident is an event that involves the release or potential release of a hazardous material, such as a toxic substance or dangerous chemical, that poses a risk to human health, property, or the environment.

Such incidents can occur during transportation, storage, handling, or use of hazardous materials, and can result from accidents, natural disasters, or intentional acts.

Therefore,  the  Examples of hazardous material incidents include chemical spills, leaks or explosions, radioactive material releases, and biological or chemical terrorist attacks.

Learn more about Fire hazard from

https://brainly.com/question/28379186

#SPJ1

Answer: gallup polling

Explanation:

The poll-taking method called quota sampling was invented by George Gallup.

While the term "stratified sampling" is commonly associated with George Gallup, it is important to note that Gallup's technique was actually a variation of quota sampling. Quota sampling is a method used to select survey participants that aim to achieve a proportional representation of different demographic groups in the population being studied.

Instead of randomly selecting individuals from each group, as in stratified sampling, quota sampling involves setting specific quotas for each demographic category and selecting participants until those quotas are met. The key idea behind quota sampling is to ensure that the final sample reflects the desired demographic distribution, such as age, gender, race, education level, or geographic location.

The researcher or interviewer is typically given specific instructions to recruit a predetermined number of individuals from each category until the quotas are filled. Quota sampling is often used when it is difficult or impractical to implement true random sampling techniques. It allows for greater control over the composition of the sample and can be more cost-effective and time-efficient compared to other sampling methods.

know more about George Gallup here:

https://brainly.com/question/31832705

#SPJ8

Answer: "C" Reasonableness

Explanation:

I'm Torn of both "A" and "C" but i believe it's C Since you have to have a reason and it has to be necessity.

Hope this helps!

Have a good day.

The decision to use force must be based on necessity and Reasonableness, not emotions. Thus, option C is correct.

Decision-making is the choosing of one or more alternatives based on certain criterion. Choosing among the various possibilities is the essence of decision-making.

The better your selections, the greater your decision-making abilities. In everyday life, you have many decision-making instances, such as deciding what to dress. Making a lunchtime decision.

Making wise judgments entails balancing the seemingly opposing powers of passion and logic. We must be able to forecast the future, perceive the present situation properly, get insight into the thoughts of others, and cope with ambiguity.

The use of force must be justified by need and logic, not by passion. As a result, option C is correct.

Learn more about decision here:

https://brainly.com/question/30003917

#SPJ2

Answer:

The fundamental human rights contained in the constitution of Nigeria are: the Right to Life, the Right to Dignity of Human Person, the Right to Personal Liberty, the Right to Fair Hearing, the Right to Private and Family Life, the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion, the Right to Freedom of Expression.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer:

OB. Drivers may not make the maneuver shown on the sign

Explanation:

This is the universal "no" sign. So don't do anything that has a red arrow shown diagonally presented in a circle.

For eg, no smoking, no left turns, or no photography permitted as shown in picture below.

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

If the two variables in a given theory move in the same direction, the variables are said to be positively correlated.

When two variables are studied and they happen to be associated, they are positively linked if they move in the same direction. This suggests that when both variables are activated, they have the same type of reaction.

If one variable suffers an increase, the other will likewise increase in a positive association. A drop in one will result in the same response in the other.

Therefore, the relationship between the two variables are said to be positive.

To learn more on variables, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ1

1. The basis for a divorce is irreconcilable differences.

2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of best interests of the child.

3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony.

4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family.

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se and not pay legal fees.

1. The basis for a collaborative divorce is the mutual agreement between the divorcing parties to work together in resolving their issues amicably and without litigation.

2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of the best interests of the child, considering factors such as the child's welfare, stability, and relationship with each parent.

3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony by facilitating communication, negotiation, and finding mutually agreeable solutions.

4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage by providing therapy, counseling, and guidance to improve communication, understanding, and relationship dynamics.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family, where both partners bring their own children from previous relationships into the new family unit.

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se, meaning they represent themselves in the legal process, without hiring an attorney. This option allows them to save on legal fees but requires them to navigate the legal proceedings and paperwork on their own.

Know more about the judge here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267

#SPJ8

The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:

Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct answer from the list below. Some terms be used more than once.

1 alimony

2 best interests of the child

3 blended family

4 child custody

5 child support

6 collaborative divorce

7 community property

8 covenant divorce

9 divorce

10 in loco parentis

11 irreconcilable differences

12-joint custody

13 kinship care

14 legal fees

15 marriage counselor

16 mediator

17 no-fault divorce

18 pro se

19 property division

20 separate property

21 Separation

22 stepparent

23 tender years doctrine

1. The basis for a ____ is ____

2. When a judge decides the issue of _____ the judge uses the standard of _____

3. A _____ helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of ___, ___, ____ and ____

4. A ____ helps married couples resolve the problems in their marriage.

5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a _______

6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go _____ and not pay_____ .

"Private communication" is a perk of a legal marriage that guards against having to testify against your partner in court.

The right to marry and start a family is guaranteed to both men and women of legal age without distinction on the basis of race, nationality, or religion. Individuals have a right to equitable treatment before, during, and after marriage.

They include the rights to life, freedom from torture, freedom from slavery or other forms of service, defence against incarceration for debt, freedom from retrospective criminal legislation, recognition as an individual in front of the law, and freedom of thought and conscience.

To know more about court visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/28567848

#SPJ1

Answer: Privileged communication is the answer

Explanation: took the law studies quiz

The "perception of increased risk" heightens the demand for security measures and fosters partnerships between law enforcement and private security to enhance protection of U.S. citizens from terrorism.

The perception of greater risk has a number of consequences for the realities of defending American citizens from terrorism. For starters, it increases the demand for security measures and creates a greater sense of urgency to avert future assaults. The anxiety and apprehension produced by the assaults drives individuals and organisations to seek security against prospective dangers.

The level of perceived risk impacts the level of protection required. When people believe there is a significant chance of terrorism, they seek increased security measures to offset that risk. This rising demand for security services opens the door to collaboration between law enforcement and private security businesses. These collaborations combine the resources, experience, and skills of both sectors to improve security, intelligence sharing, and incident response.

The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.

The rise of public-private partnerships since 9/11 provides evidence of the link between risk, perceived danger, and the level of need for security. Through efforts such as the Department of Homeland Security's Infrastructure Protection Partnership, the federal government has encouraged collaboration between law enforcement agencies and commercial security firms. These collaborations strive to combine the investigative and enforcement powers of law enforcement with the specialized knowledge and resources of private security.

For more questions on law enforcement

https://brainly.com/question/29422434

#SPJ8

Answer:

Ang aking gagawin ay Poprotektahan ko ang aking bayan

Answer:

A False Sense Of Confidence Would Be Not Be NOT Believing In Yourself. We Can Conclude The Driver Would Probably Be Recklessly.

A Would Be Your Answer, He Trusts Himself But It's Reckless if he does something.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

The Parliament (represented by an icon of Australian Parliament House) has the power to make and change law. The Executive (represented by a group of people) has the power to put law into action. The Judiciary (represented by an icon of a scale) has the power to make judgements on law

Answer:

A. Why it would be beneficial or not to have smoking in public places. How it could potentially affect others rights to smoke.

B. This is what you would do with your info

C. Smokers may or may not oppose it depending on what side you choose and non-smokers may oppose it.

Explanation: