describe some ways in which world war i threatened the lives of civilians on both sides of the atlantic.

Progressive and conservative Republicans disagreed on the role of the US government in the early 1900s. The correct option is A.

Progressives were more likely to call for the government to play a larger role in addressing social and economic problems, regulating enterprises, and enacting changes to enhance working conditions and advance social welfare.

Conservative Republicans, on the other hand, supported a smaller role for the government, putting an emphasis on individual freedom, free-market capitalism, and lessening government involvement in economic and social matters.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about Conservative Republicans here:

https://brainly.com/question/29996580

#SPJ12

In the early 1900s, Progressive Republicans typically advocated for an expanded governmental role, favoring regulation and intervention in the economy, while conservative Republicans generally upheld the principles of limited government and laissez-faire economics.

In the early 1900s, a prominent point of disagreement between Progressive and conservative Republicans pertained to the role of the US government. Progressives typically advocated for an expanded governmental role, favoring regulation and intervention in the economy to achieve fairness and social justice. Conversely, conservative Republicans generally upheld the principles of limited government, individualism and laissez-faire economics.

For example, Progressive Republicans like Theodore Roosevelt supported government regulation of business, services such as public health and education, and the enactment of labor laws. On the other hand, conservative Republicans staunchly opposed government interference, preferring a free-market approach.

During this period, foreign policies and trade were also important, but the key divergence rested with their view on the role of the US government.

https://brainly.com/question/31725984

#SPJ12

It is both Yes and No for me. Whether readers feel encouraged or discouraged by the words of a particular author depends on many factors, including the author's message, the reader's own worldview and experiences, and the context in which the words are read.

Ashoka was an Indian emperor who ruled from 268 to 232 BCE. He is known for his edicts, which were inscribed on pillars and rocks throughout his empire and expressed his views on morality, justice, and governance. Ashoka's edicts are often seen as promoting moral and ethical behavior, and encouraging his subjects to live peaceful and compassionate lives. Thus, it is likely that his words would have encouraged his readers to do better, to strive for moral excellence, and to follow the principles he espoused.

Similarly, the words of a Hindu writer would depend on the specific writer and their message. Hinduism is a diverse and complex religion with many different interpretations and philosophical schools. Some Hindu writers may write about the importance of living a moral and ethical life, and encourage their readers to do the same. Others may focus on spiritual practices, such as meditation or yoga, as a means of achieving enlightenment or liberation from suffering. Depending on the writer's message, their readers may feel encouraged, inspired, or challenged to live a better life. However, that does not translate to the fact that all readers of such text are doing better.

Ultimately, whether readers feel encouraged or discouraged by the words of a particular author depends on many factors, including the author's message, the reader's own worldview and experiences, and the context in which the words are read.

learn more about Ashoka: https://brainly.com/question/25740025

#SPJ1

The Spanish conquistadors were able to conquer the Aztec city because:

In history, the Spanish-Aztec war was also known as the Battle of Tenochtitlan. This battle was a military engagement between Aztecs and Spanish combatants that was commanded by Hernán Cortés allied with local tribes to conquer the Aztec capital city of Tenochtitlán.The spanish army besieged Tenochtitlán for 93 days, with a combination of superior weaponry and a devastating smallpox outbreak enabled the Spanish to conquer the city.

In the 16th century, the Aztecs however controlled a vast territory containing 400 to 500 subjugated states and conferred absolute power on a tlatoani or ruler. They demanded a regular tributes of their conquered subjects, and often these tributes took the form of human sacrificial offerings. The key pillar of its religion was the belief that the gods had given their lives to create this world so humans were bound to repay that debt in blood.

In conclusion, after the war, the Spanish victory destroyed the Aztec empire and the Spanish began to consolidate control over what became the colony of New Spain.

Read more about Battle of Tenochtitlan

brainly.com/question/738292

#SPJ1

Answer:

There are three main reasons for European Exploration. Them being for the sake of their economy, religion and glory. They wanted to improve their economy for instance by acquiring more spices, gold, and better and faster trading routes.

Answer: D, paper for writing.

The aztecs adapted to the difficulties of building a city in lake texcoc by building a steaks into the ground and use of volcanic rock to strengthen them which made then an advanced society.

This civilization belongs to the indigenous people that was dominant in Mexico before the Spanish conquest of the 16th century.

They also alone used cosways to prevent their buildings from sinking into the lakes.

Read more about aztecs

brainly.com/question/19457259

#SPJ1

The early and middle ages, which began in the fifth century, were typically referred to as feudalism and the feudal system.

The Roman manorial system, in which laborers were provided with protection while residing on vast estates, and the Frankish kingdom of the eighth century, where a king granted land for life (benefice) to reward obedient nobles and obtain service in return, are the systems' antecedents.

The terms "feudalism" and "feudal system" were typically used to describe the early and middle Middle Ages, which covered the time from the 5th century, when the Western Empire's central political authority vanished, to the 12th century, when kingdoms started to emerge as efficient centralized governmental units.

increase in knighthood

In the 700s, the first knights of the Middle Ages battled for Charlemagne, the Frankish king. Charlemagne started using soldiers on horses to fight battles across his vast realm. You typically became a knight if you were a son born into a family of a knight.

The holy orders that the Catholic Church founded in the Middle Ages is the origin of the knighthood institution. The word "order" (derived from the Latin "ordo") then denoted a closed group whose members vowed to uphold a set of rules and were subject to particular duties.

Learn more about "feudalism": https://brainly.com/question/28524143

#SPJ13

Answer:

volunteering in the community

Answer:

Columbus—Isabella's Primary Attitude—The Ecclesiastical Council— Columbus Sent from Court in Disappointment—How Perez and a Few Others Had Called Him Back—His Interview With the Queen at Santa Fé—Her Favorable Reflection and Strong Decision—Isabella Became the Patroness of the Enterprise—Columbus' Discovery of the New World (1492)—His Reception and Second Voyage, September, 1493—The Troubles that Envy Brought—Reception of Columbus at Burgos—The Voyage of 1498—Priests and Convicts Fill Up the Ships—A Commissioner, Bovadillo, Sent to Hispaniola—Columbus Went Back to Spain in Irons—Isabelia's Vexation—She Showed him Friendship—Ferdinand Detained Him—Ovando Went to the New World—Isabella Bade Columbus Farewell for his Fourth Voyage 1502)—Her Kindness to the Natives.

In the history of Christopher Columbus there are phases and incidents of his remarkable career that blend at some important points with the life of Queen Isabella. When we look at Columbus from the standpoint of posterity, and mark his enlightened conviction and his indomitable purpose, we cannot help feeling that it was not a little strange that an intelligent, courageous, and enterprising woman like this queen should have allowed this patient and able investigator to follow her court so long without extending to him sympathy and help. But we must remember' that then, as now, there were screens which limited the vision of any such royal person as Isabella. For her, most clearly defined, was that almost impenetrable one raised by the Church officials around her, who themselves were environed by ignorance, prejudice, and superstition. Fernando de Talavera, her confessor, with all his sincerity, was their confidant and their exponent

Explanation:

hope this help mark branlest plese

Answer:

d. Separation of Power

Explanation:

Separation of power is the process whereby the government powers in a country is shared among the different arms of government in order to prevent law abuse.

In a democratic government setting, we have the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary which helps in the running of the government. All its functions are interwined at same time separated from each other.

Answer:

People in Central and Eastern Europe are less accepting of Muslims and Jews, same-sex marriage, and legal abortion

The Iron Curtain that once divided Europe may be long gone, but the continent today is split by stark differences in public attitudes toward religion, minorities and social issues such as gay marriage and legal abortion. Compared with Western Europeans, fewer Central and Eastern Europeans would welcome Muslims or Jews into their families or neighborhoods, extend the right of marriage to gay or lesbian couples or broaden the definition of national identity to include people born outside their country.

These differences emerge from a series of surveys conducted by Pew Research Center between 2015 and 2017 among nearly 56,000 adults (ages 18 and older) in 34 Western, Central and Eastern European countries, and they continue to divide the continent more than a decade after the European Union began to expand well beyond its Western European roots to include, among others, the Central European countries of Poland and Hungary, and the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Explanation:

One historical event that can be considered a meeting in modern times is the Yalta Conference of 1945. The Yalta Conference was a diplomatic meeting held during World War II between the leaders of the three major Allied powers: Franklin D. Roosevelt (United States), Winston Churchill (United Kingdom), and Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union). The meeting took place in Yalta, Crimea, and lasted from February 4 to 11, 1945.

The purpose of the Yalta Conference was to discuss and plan the post-war reorganization of Europe and address key issues such as the establishment of the United Nations, the division of Germany, and the future of Eastern European countries liberated from Nazi control. The participants of the meeting were Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin, along with their respective advisers and diplomats.

The Yalta Conference was a crucial meeting as it shaped the course of the post-war world and had significant implications for the Cold War era. It marked a pivotal moment in diplomatic relations between the Allies and the Soviet Union, and decisions made during the conference had a profound impact on the political landscape of Europe.

To learn more about diplomats

https://brainly.com/question/518089

#SPJ11

The United States experienced a shock in 1949 when Communists took over China. The Communist Party of China, led by Mao Zedong, emerged victorious in the Chinese Civil War against the Nationalist Party.

The Chinese Communist Party's rise to power had far-reaching consequences for the United States and the world. The U.S. had supported Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist government during the civil war, providing military aid and assistance. However, the Communist victory meant that China, with its vast population and resources, became a communist state aligned with the Soviet Union.

This development was seen as a major setback for the U.S., as it feared the spread of communism and the potential loss of a key ally in East Asia. The United States responded by implementing containment policies and increasing its involvement in the region, particularly during the Korean War and the Vietnam War, in an effort to curb the influence of communism in Asia. The shock of China's communist takeover in 1949 reverberated throughout the Cold War and shaped U.S. foreign policy for decades to come.

To learn more about Communists click here:

brainly.com/question/23716206

#SPJ11

Answer:

repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare

Answer: Bad foreign trade practices

Explanation: In 1920 credit was first started so people overbought ALOT which was one cause of the great depression. Secondly, farmers overproduced alot because they thought the more they produced, the more money they would make. Lastly, the 1930 was the prime year of working conditions because it was around the industrialization ERA. So the answer is Bad foreign trade practices

Answer:

d.

Explanation:

d.an unpleasant surprise

hope this is useful

The Stabilization Act of 1942 empowered and commanded the President to sign an order restoring prices, wages, and salaries to their prior levels.

The Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 was amended by the Stabilization Act of 1942, which is sometimes known as the "Inflation Control Act" and was officially titled "An Act to Modify the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, to Assist in Avoiding Inflation, and for Other Purposes." The Act gave the President the authority and mandate to issue an order restoring prices, wages, and salaries to their pre-September 15, 1942 levels, as well as to establish any additional regulations necessary to carry out the Act. "Insurance and pension benefits in a fair amount to be set by the President" were specifically excluded from stabilization under the Act.

To know more about Inflation

brainly.com/question/29308595

#SPJ4

Answer:

non whatsoever

Explanation:

i did it on work

Answer:

Flocks and Hunter-gatherers had what sort of relationship?

The relationship they had is hunter-gatherer hunted flocks.

Hope this helped you!

Have a good day! :))))

I know this because i had this on a test

Answer:

c

Explanation:

The problem that developed between Cassius and Brutus was an argument about the fate of a man named Lucius Pella. Cassius, a character in William Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar," is portrayed as manipulative and cunning.

In Act IV, Scene III, the two characters sit down to discuss the situation, with Brutus insisting that the man should not be executed without a fair trial. Cassius agrees to this proposal but argues that if they spare Pella, it could be perceived as a sign of weakness, which could hurt their cause.

They ultimately agree to compromise by letting Pella live but giving him a public whipping to show the people that they still mean business. The argument between Cassius and Brutus over Lucius Pella's fate is resolved through compromise.

Learn more about Cassius and Brutus:

https://brainly.com/question/32075934

#SPJ11

Answer: C, The Catholics.

Explanation:

Answer: Olmec

Explanation: In my books it says Olmec was the first

Answer:

The correct answer to this is B

In the goods market model, government spending is typically measured in units of currency, such as current dollars or U.S. dollars.

These units of measurement reflect the monetary value of government expenditures on goods, services, investments, and transfers. The use of current dollars or U.S. dollars allows for consistency and comparability in measuring government spending across different time periods and regions.

Canadian dollars can also be used as a unit of measurement if the analysis focuses specifically on the Canadian context. However, cars, which represent a physical good, are not typically used as a unit of measurement for government spending in the goods market model.

To learn more about  government click here:

brainly.com/question/8133200?

#SPJ11

Answer:

The slave trade is evil

Explanation:

good luck on the rest!

Answer:

300 tennis balls

Explanation:

There are 60 minutes in an hour so...

60/12 = 5

Since 60 tennis balls can be launched in 12 minutes and 12x5 is one hour, 60x5 tennis balls can be launched in an hour.

60(5) = 300

People who categorize themselves as anti-imperialists often state that they are opposed to colonialism, colonial empires, hegemony, imperialism and the territorial expansion of a country beyond its established borders.

Imperialism is the state policy, practice, or advocacy of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining political and economic control of other areas, often through employing hard power, especially military force, but also soft power.

Although diverse in motives and party affiliation, the anti-imperialists shared common fears and beliefs.

They were convinced that imperialism threatened the ideals and institutions of their own country, and many believed that it was unjust to dictate the political goals and institutions of foreign peoples.

Learn more about anti imperialist here:

Answer:The Supreme Leader of Iran

Explanation:

Answer:

Chief Tecumseh urges Native Americans to unite against white settlers. Alarmed by the growing encroachment of whites settlers squatting on Native American lands, the Shawnee Chief Tecumseh calls on all Native peoples to unite and resist and it was very successful as to say.