Does Paul Revere appear to be achieving the primary purpose for
the organizing he does?

Answer:

PROCESS DIAGRAM

Explanation:

The visual tool should Anita use to best illustrate the development of women's roles is a process diagram. Thus the correct option is B.

Any kind of hint or idea reflects from the statements which help the reader to understand the clear context in which the word is used refers to a context clue. This clue helps the reader to determine the appropriate meaning.

The case in point explains that Anita was given a project to complete on the development of women's roles in western culture. She must produce a visual that conveys broad information and demonstrates how women's roles have changed over time.

An explanation of a process's operation and the various stages it goes through is provided by a process diagram. These are employed to simulate the flow of actions inside a process.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about context clues, here:

https://brainly.com/question/20263792

#SPJ2

Answer:

Richard Nixon

Explanation:

He first supported African Americans all the way back in 1969

Answer:2. jellyfish

Explanation:Jacques Cousteau made films about underwater exploration.

An average of 24 seats are present in each room.

20 x 6 = 120 chairs for each of the six rooms.

30 * 4 = 120 chairs total in the four rooms.

Total number of seats divided by the total number of rooms equals 240/10, or 24 chairs on average per room.

Only numerical variables—regardless of whether they are discrete or continuous—can be used to determine the mean. Simply dividing the total number of values in a data set by the sum of all of the values yields it. The calculation can be performed on unprocessed data or data that has been combined into a frequency table.

The average of the numbers is the mean. Calculating is simple: add up all the numbers, then divide by the total amount of numbers. To put it another way, it is the total divided by the number.

To Know more about  average

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ1

A.  The difference in proportions is unknown. B.  Standard error cannot be determined. C.  Confidence interval is unavailable.  D. Plausible. E. Plausible. F. Unknown. G. Unknown.

To estimate the difference in the proportion of Black and Hispanic young people who turn to their mother with problems using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97) data, we need the specific values of proportions for each group. Without this information, it is not possible to provide an accurate answer to questions A, B, C, F, and G.

However, I can guide you through the general steps you would need to take to calculate these statistics once you have the relevant data.

A.    Difference in Proportions: To find the difference in proportions (p^​b​− p^​h​), you would subtract the proportion of Black youth who turn to their mother from the proportion of Hispanic youth who do the same. It can be expressed as (p^​b​ - p^​h​).

B.    Standard Error: The standard error measures the uncertainty in your estimate of the difference in proportions. It can be calculated using statistical software like StatKey once you have the data. The standard error allows you to determine the precision of your estimate.

C.    95% Confidence Interval (CI): With the standard error, you can calculate the confidence interval. The lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval give you a range within which the true difference in proportions is likely to lie. The 95% confidence interval is commonly used, and it can be calculated as the estimated difference ± (1.96 * standard error).

D.     Plausibility of a greater proportion of Black youth than Hispanic youth turning to their mother with problems: Once you have the confidence interval, if the lower bound of the interval is greater than zero, it suggests that it is plausible that a greater proportion of Black youth turn to their mother with problems compared to Hispanic youth.

E.     Plausibility of a lower proportion of Black youth than Hispanic youth turning to their mother with problems: If the upper bound of the confidence interval is less than zero, it suggests that it is plausible that a lower proportion of Black youth turn to their mother with problems compared to Hispanic youth.

F.     Plausibility of the same proportion of Black youth and Hispanic youth turning to their mother with problems: If the confidence interval includes zero, it suggests that it is plausible that the proportions are the same for Black and Hispanic youth.

G.    Comparison of proportions between Black and Hispanic youth: Based on the results from the confidence interval, you can determine whether a greater proportion of Black youth than Hispanic youth turn to their mother with problems. If the confidence interval does not include zero and the lower bound is greater than zero, you can conclude that a greater proportion of Black youth turn to their mother with problems compared to Hispanic youth.

It's important to note that without the specific data and calculations, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer to these questions.

Learn more about Proportional Differences.

brainly.com/question/30241688

#SPJ11

During the period from 1960 to 1999 Nigeria experienced several constitutional changes that allowed it to have different models of government.

Nigeria is a country in West Africa, bordered by Niger to the north, Chad to the northeast, Cameroon to the east, and Benin to the west. Its southern coast is located in the Gulf of Guinea in the Atlantic Ocean. The federation comprises 36 states and 1 federal territory, where the capital, Abuja, is located.

Since 1960 Nigeria has had several constitutional changes which are:

Learn more about Nigeria in: https://brainly.com/question/523364

#SPJ1

Answer:

Because the refugees in the Astrodome were being care for more than the local poor people.

Explanation:

Barbara Bush believe that the refugees in the Astrodome were being taken care of, fed, and provided with basic necessities on a daily basis, which was better than what poor people live with in their normal lives. In other word, they enjoy more interventions and live better life than the poor people living in the community.

Answer:

1: Timeline

2: Bar Chart

Explanation:

A timeline is a diagram in which the events that happened in a certain period of time are established, in the chronological order in which they happened, thus showing a well-defined sequence between them. In other words, the timeline is a visual representation of a chronological sequence.

The bar graph, on the other hand, is a graph, a diagram that establishes the comparison between two or more elements. This type of graph is a representation, where each bar represents, in this case, the population in each of the regions. Each bar is placed next to each other so that the comparison between them can be made.

The maximin principle is a theory by philosopher John Rawls in the 1970s, which suggests that to help ease the social issue of unequal income distribution, society must choose to act in a manner that ensures that the least advantaged group is better off than they would be under any other possible options.

This principle is often used in a social context, and it is relevant to issues of income distribution, resource allocation, and access to opportunities.The maximin principle's main concept is to distribute income or wealth equally amongst individuals so that everyone gets an equal share of the resources available.

According to this principle, every individual must have an equal say in the distribution of resources. Moreover, it must be ensured that the least fortunate groups must be given the most substantial benefits to reduce the gap between the poor and the rich.In simple words, it means that everyone should receive the same rights and privileges and receive equal treatment from society.

People must be treated with respect, and everyone must have the same opportunities. The maximin principle can help society to overcome social inequality. If society chooses to follow the maximin principle, it will eventually lead to a fairer and just society.

To know more about philosopher John Rawls visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29629666

#SPJ11

In this case

585.55 divided by (33+2)

585.55 divided by 35

16.73 dollars.

On lunch the money spent was

319.44 divided by 33

9.68 dollar

The total money spent on student was

16.73 + 9.68

26.41 dollar per student.

The total money spent on student was

26.41 dollar.

What do you mean by money?

Anything which is accepted as a medium of exchange is called money. Money can be any commodity or item if it is regarded as money by everybody.

To learn more about money from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28346494

#SPJ4

The consequences after the Haymarket Riot were support for the Knights of Labor dwindled, which was seen as a defeat for the American labor movement as a whole, which was campaigning for reforms including an eight-hour workweek.

The May 4, 1886 labor protest rally near Chicago's Haymarket Square descended into chaos after a bomb was thrown at police. Eight persons were killed that day as a direct result of the fighting. Eight radical labor activists were convicted in connection with the blast despite a lack of proof. The American labor movement, which had been campaigning for improvements like the eight-hour workday, suffered a blow after the Haymarket Riot. Many people involved in the labor movement saw the guys who were condemned in connection with the incident as martyrs.

The Knights of Labor suffered significant decline as a labor union as a result of the Haymarket Riot. The Haymarket Riot also inflicted a major blow to labor unions. The labor movement's reputation would suffer for quite some time after this occurrence. Union membership grew as a result of the Haymarket Riot. Even though organized labor was still in its infancy at the time, the Knights of Labor, the largest organization in the country, grew by more than 40,000 members in the months following the May 1886 Riot.

To learn more about Haymarket Riot, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1831737

#SPJ4

Answer: B, by countering what protestants were teaching

Explanation:

hope this helps good luck :)

Black vocalists of the highest caliber and wealthy downtown customers contributed to the cotton club's reputation-building.This club was called the cotton club because it featured black performers.

In the 1920s and 1930s, when there was Prohibition, The Cotton Club was Harlem's most prestigious nightclub. Numerous well-known African American artists, including Count Basie, Ella Fitzgerald, Fats Waller, Louis Armstrong, Dizzy Gillespie, Nat King Cole, Billie Holiday, and Ethel Waters, performed at the club at the time.A "rush of whites toward Harlem after dusk, filling the little cabarets and pubs where formerly only colored people laughed and sang" was brought on by the club. Hughes also talked on how this resulted in a number of neighbouring cabarets, especially black cabarets, having to close.

To know more about Cotton Club visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29615518

#SPJ4

Answer:

Germany was forced to pay absurd war reparations.  A lot of their lands were divided up and taken by allies countries.  All of their colonies were given away. The treaty also limited their military to 100000 troops and most vehicles were banned from them.

Even though Myanmar was colonised more than 60 years ago, the effects of imperialism are still clearly visible today.

Imperialism has a negative impact on infrastructure, language, and dress. People may believe that imperialism was all sunshine and rainbows because of these effects, but in actuality, it ruthlessly destroyed a nation's various aspects. Societies were negatively affected by imperialism in countless ways. Slavery trade resulted from it, and social discrimination spread throughout the world. it harmed the cultures and divided the natives. Not to mention that imperialism stole natural resources from countries and left nothing for the native population.

To know about imperialism visit :

https://brainly.com/question/1225474

#SPJ1

Answer:

A) 1

B) 2

C) 3

Explanation:

1. The steps taken by white settlers to take over Native American land included forced removals, treaties, military campaigns, and the establishment of reservations.

2. The justification of their actions is a matter of debate, but from a historical perspective, many argue that the actions of white settlers were not justified as they involved the displacement, marginalization, and mistreatment of Native American communities.

3. Alternative steps that could have allowed for more fairness and equality could have included genuine negotiation and collaboration with Native American tribes, respecting their sovereignty and land rights, and seeking mutually beneficial agreements.

The steps taken by white settlers to take over Native American land involved various methods. Forced removals, such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830, led to the relocation of many Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to designated areas further west. Treaties were also used, often under duress or unfair circumstances, to acquire Native American lands. Military campaigns were employed to suppress resistance and exert control over territories. Finally, the establishment of reservations confined Native Americans to specific areas, further limiting their autonomy and control over their lands.

The justification of the actions taken by white settlers is a complex and controversial issue. From a historical perspective, many argue that the actions were not justified. The seizure of Native American lands involved the displacement, marginalization, and mistreatment of indigenous communities, leading to the loss of their cultural heritage, livelihoods, and sovereignty. The forced removals and unfair treaties violated the rights and dignity of Native Americans, resulting in immense suffering and lasting consequences.

Alternative steps could have been taken to promote fairness and equality. Genuine negotiation and collaboration with Native American tribes, recognizing their sovereignty and land rights, would have been a more just approach. Respecting and honoring existing treaties and agreements, rather than forcefully breaking them, would have fostered trust and cooperation. Additionally, exploring economic partnerships and shared governance models could have provided opportunities for Native Americans to maintain their way of life, exercise self-governance, and enjoy equitable benefits from the land.

Learn more about White Settlers: https://brainly.com/question/28444945

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Corinth's location in ancient Greece was strategically advantageous, which contributed to its economic power in several ways:

Geographical Location: Corinth was situated on the narrow strip of land connecting the Peloponnese Peninsula to the mainland of Greece, known as the Isthmus of Corinth. This location made it a key transportation hub, as it provided a shortcut for ships to avoid the long and treacherous journey around the Peloponnese Peninsula. This made Corinth a major center of trade and commerce, as it controlled the movement of goods and people between the Aegean Sea and the Ionian Sea, facilitating maritime trade and generating revenue through tolls and tariffs.

Natural Resources: Corinth was located near fertile agricultural lands, which allowed it to produce abundant agricultural goods, such as grains, grapes, and olives. Additionally, the region was rich in natural resources, including timber, marble, and precious metals. These resources provided the foundation for Corinth's economic activities, including agriculture, mining, and manufacturing of goods, which contributed to its economic prosperity.

Access to Sea and Land Routes: Corinth's location on the Isthmus provided it with easy access to both the Aegean Sea and the Ionian Sea, which facilitated maritime trade with other regions in the Mediterranean. It also had well-established overland routes that connected it to other important cities in Greece, such as Athens and Thebes. This made Corinth a strategic trade and transportation hub, with efficient access to both sea and land routes, enhancing its economic power.

Fortified Position: Corinth was situated on a natural acropolis, which provided a defensive advantage against external threats. The city was also able to control access to the Isthmus through fortified walls and gates, giving it a strategic advantage in terms of defense and security. This stability and security allowed for uninterrupted economic activities, attracting merchants, traders, and investors, which contributed to its economic prosperity.

In summary, Corinth's location provided it with strategic advantages, including its position as a transportation hub, access to natural resources, efficient trade routes, and defensive fortifications, which all contributed to its economic power in ancient Greece. These factors made Corinth a thriving economic center and a prominent city-state in the region during its peak. So, it can be concluded that Corinth's location was a significant factor in its economic prosperity and power in ancient times. Additionally, it's important to note that ancient Corinth was destroyed and rebuilt multiple times throughout history, and its economic power fluctuated depending on various factors such as wars, trade routes, and political changes. Nevertheless, its strategic location played a crucial role in its economic prominence during its peak periods.

Answer:

Explanation:

They rejected is as unfair to them. Arabs living in Palestine in 1948 felt rejected is as unfair to them about the creation of the new state of Israel.

The Palestinian Arabs refused to accept this arrangement because they saw it as unjust to the Arabs who would continue to live in Jewish territory and in favour of the Jews. The United States attempted a middle path by supporting the UN resolution and encouraging negotiations between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East.

The conflict became more intense after Israel proclaimed its independence on May 14, 1948, as additional Arab armies joined the Palestinian Arabs in attacking the former Palestinian administration.

The correct option is d.

To learn more about Palestine in 1948 refer here

https://brainly.com/question/28206415#
#SPJ4

Answer:

My opinion is that the Principle of Deterrence is true.

Explanation:

The Principle of Deterrence was founded on the notion that; a nuclear attack by one superpower would be met with an overwhelming nuclear counterattack such that both the attacker and the defender would be annihilated. This states if you attack another "superpower" or nation, they will likely return fire. This will likely result in both undercoming severe damage and costs.



Have a great rest of your day
#TheWizzer

Answer: A, is the one that makes the most sense/ only sense because in fact during the war they needed a new way of ruling. Instead of fighting and yet being governed by the same people they are fighting to make a change.  

Between 1950 and the mid-1990s, the United States experienced a much larger increase in the standard of living than the Soviet Union. This difference can be most attributed to the fact that the U.S. embraced capitalism while the Soviet Union embraced communism.

Capitalism is an economic system in which resources and businesses are controlled and owned by individuals. Individuals have the right to make their own decisions about how to allocate their resources and what to produce. This competition creates an incentive for businesses to innovate and become more efficient. Communism is an economic system in which the government owns and controls all resources and businesses. The government makes all decisions about what to produce, how to allocate resources, and how to distribute goods and services.

There is no competition, so there is little incentive for businesses to innovate or become more efficient. In conclusion, the United States experienced a much larger increase in the standard of living than the Soviet Union due to the fact that the U.S. embraced capitalism while the Soviet Union embraced communism.

Learn more about Capitalism

https://brainly.com/question/26119138

SPJ11

Answer:

Hey there!

The British thought these battles would teach the colonists not to fight against the powerful British army.

The colonists, although many were lost during this tragic battle, showed the British that any unfair laws or acts would not be accepted in the colonies.

Let me know if this helps :)

Cahokia and Teotihuacán are two ancient civilizations that have left behind fascinating archaeological sites, yet they still hold many mysteries and unanswered questions. Here are some of the mysteries surrounding Cahokia and Teotihuacán:

1. Cahokia:

Cahokia, located near present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once the largest city in North America during the Mississippian culture (900-1500 CE). Despite its prominence, there are still enigmatic aspects of Cahokia's civilization. One mystery revolves around the purpose and function of the massive earthen mounds found at the site. These mounds, such as Monk's Mound, were monumental structures that served various purposes, including ceremonial, residential, and administrative. However, the exact rituals and activities conducted on these mounds remain uncertain.

Another mystery is the decline and abandonment of Cahokia. By the 14th century, the city's population dwindled, and it was eventually abandoned. The reasons behind this decline are still debated among scholars. Possible factors include environmental changes, political instability, social conflicts, or the spread of diseases. Unraveling the specific causes of Cahokia's decline would shed light on the factors that shaped the fate of this once-thriving civilization.

2. Teotihuacán:

Teotihuacán, located near modern-day Mexico City, was one of the largest and most influential cities in ancient Mesoamerica. Its monumental architecture, including the Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, reflects the city's grandeur. However, much about Teotihuacán remains a mystery. One enigma is the identity of its rulers and the nature of its political organization. Despite extensive archaeological research, no clear evidence of kings or a centralized ruling system has been found.

Another mystery is the purpose and symbolism behind the elaborate murals and iconography found throughout the city. The meanings behind the intricate frescoes and carvings are still not fully understood, leaving room for interpretation and speculation.

Additionally, the collapse of Teotihuacán is another unresolved mystery. Around the 7th century CE, the city experienced a decline and eventual abandonment. The causes of this collapse, such as social unrest, environmental factors, or external invasions, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Studying and uncovering the mysteries of Cahokia and Teotihuacán is an ongoing endeavor that involves archaeological investigations, interdisciplinary research, and the analysis of cultural and historical contexts. By piecing together the fragments of these ancient civilizations, we can gain a deeper understanding of their complexities and the factors that shaped their rise and fall

for more questions on .archaeological

https://brainly.com/question/928273

#SPJ8

Answer:

this is answer

Explanation:

in the American colonies however the Navigation Act led to significant upheaval of the colonists built on President by param limit and although most of the acts of little stacked on the average colonist they drastically affected the livelihood of merchants

Answer:

Philosophy is a particular set of ideas that a philosopher has.

Explanation:

Answer: Philosophy is the study of underlying things. This means philosophy tries to understand the reasons or basis for things. It also tries to understand how things should be. "Philosophia" is the Ancient Greek word for the "love of wisdom". ... A "philosophy" can also mean a group of ideas by philosophers, or by a philosopher.

→Mark me as a brainliest←

Answer:

A proxy war is an armed conflict between two states or non-state actors which act on the instigation or on behalf of other parties that are not directly involved in the hostilities.

Explanation:

Answer: (definition from dictionary) A war instigated by a major power which does not itself become involved.

Explanation:

For example: Where two countries who are in conflict with one another uses substitutes to fight in their place.