FILL IN THE BLANK. If a show of authority by a law enforcement officer does not result in a halting or submission by the person being confronted, there is _____ under the Fourth Amendment

The correct answer is c) $469.79. This amount represents the pre-paid interest to the borrower for a $205,000 loan at a 5.5% annual interest rate that closes on November 15.

To calculate the amount of pre-paid interest to the borrower, we need to determine the number of days between the closing date (November 15) and the end of the month (November 30). We will assume a 30-day month for simplicity.

Step 1: Calculate the daily interest rate:

Daily interest rate = Annual interest rate / 365

                 = 5.5% / 365

                 = 0.01507

Step 2: Calculate the number of days between the closing date and the end of the month:

Number of days = 30 (assuming a 30-day month) - 15 (closing date)

              = 15 days

Step 3: Calculate the pre-paid interest:

Pre-paid interest = Loan amount * Daily interest rate * Number of days

                = $205,000 * 0.01507 * 15

                = $469.79 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Therefore, the amount of pre-paid interest to the borrower is approximately $469.79.

The correct answer is c) $469.79. This amount represents the pre-paid interest to the borrower for a $205,000 loan at a 5.5% annual interest rate that closes on November 15.

To know more about amount, visit:

brainly.com/question/31538664

#SPJ11

Title VII is a law that prohibits employment discrimination based on an employee's gender, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin. It is possible for a company's dress code policy to violate Title VII if it is discriminatory or creates a hostile work environment for a particular group of employees. In the case of Harrah's requirement that women wear makeup, it is not clear whether it would violate Title VII.

Here's why:

On one hand, a dress code policy that requires women to wear makeup could be seen as discriminatory because it is based on gender. The policy could be seen as requiring women to look a certain way in order to be considered professional or attractive, which could create a hostile work environment for women who do not wish to wear makeup. If the policy had the effect of preventing women from being promoted or receiving equal pay because they chose not to wear makeup, then it would be discriminatory.

On the other hand, it could be argued that the policy is not discriminatory because it applies equally to all employees, regardless of gender. The policy could be seen as requiring all employees to look presentable and professional, which could be considered a legitimate business interest. If the policy did not have the effect of discriminating against women or creating a hostile work environment, then it would not violate Title VII

.In conclusion, it is not possible to say definitively whether Harrah's requirement that women wear makeup violated Title VII without more information about how the policy was applied in practice. It is possible that the policy was discriminatory, but it is also possible that it was not.

Learn more about discrimination from:

https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ11

Answer:

what grade

Explanation:

Go call the school file a report, try to calm down when stuff like that happens, try to explain what happened to your parents especially if they are upset don't talk back when explain when you feel like cussing them out back just drink water or laugh at them-hope it's helps

Answer:

c is the answer

Explanation:

be cause

Answer:

duputy doofues

esssderfgrt

Explanation:

The statement is true. A partner is required to act in good faith and loyalty towards the partnership and other partners.  

This duty involves placing the partnership's interests above personal interests, acting in good faith, and avoiding conflicts of interest. This means that they should not engage in any activity that could harm the partnership or their partners or use partnership assets for their own personal gain without proper authorization. Partners are also expected to disclose any conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest that may arise during the course of the partnership. Failure to uphold this duty of loyalty could result in legal action against the partner and potential dissolution of the partnership.

To learn more about partnership, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29988619

#SPJ11

One state is required to recognize an octal number divisible by 3 when considering the minimum possible value of each digit as 0.

To determine the minimum number of states required to recognize an octal number divisible by 3, we need to consider the divisibility rule for 3 in octal numbers. In decimal, a number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3.

In octal, the digits range from 0 to 7. The octal digits that are divisible by 3 are 0, 3, and 6. Therefore, for an octal number to be divisible by 3, all its digits must be 0, 3, or 6.

Since we want to find the minimum number of states required to recognize such a number, we need to consider the case where each digit is the minimum possible value, which is 0. Therefore, the minimum number of states required to recognize an octal number divisible by 3 is 1 state.

In summary, only one state is required to recognize an octal number divisible by 3 when considering the minimum possible value of each digit as 0.

Learn more about octal number                  

https://brainly.com/question/31487891      

#SPJ11

The document is called Pleadings.

A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.

The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgement will be rendered in their favour, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel an action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.

To know more about Lawsuit, visit

https://brainly.com/question/22194178

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

Answer:

Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.

Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.

In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts. There are two realms that make up the application of the law. Public law, which includes criminal law, administrative law,

In accordance with Texas law, all children under the age of eight must sit in a child safety seat unless they are taller than 4 feet 9 inches. Older kids who have outgrown a booster seat need to be belted in.

Therefore, By the law, it requires a child safety seat whenever they ride in a vehicle.

Learn more about the law here:

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ2

CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Detection) is a communication rule that is used in Ethernet networks. In the context of communication rules, the best way to describe CSMA/CD is a protocol for medium access control.

CSMA/CD is utilized in Ethernet networks to regulate access to the shared transmission medium. It is a protocol that governs the way in which network nodes transmit data packets over the medium. A node must check the medium before transmitting a packet. If the medium is idle, the node may transmit the packet. If the medium is busy, the node must wait for some time before retrying to transmit the packet. When the node transmits a packet, it keeps an eye on the medium for any possible collisions. If a collision is detected, the node aborts the transmission and sends a jam signal. The node then waits for a random amount of time before retrying the transmission.CSMA/CD is a key protocol that governs medium access control in Ethernet networks. Its mechanism for regulating network access and detecting collisions is critical to ensuring that packets are transmitted and received correctly. Therefore, it is essential to understand the operation of CSMA/CD in Ethernet networks.

For more such questions on Ethernet

https://brainly.com/question/1637942

#SPJ11

Answer:

nuu

Explanation:

Answer:

The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people.

EXPLANATION:

Ehrlichman told journalist Dan Baum in 1994. "You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or blacks, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities."

The accusation was shocking, characterizing the war on drugs as a racist, politically motivated crusade.

But Ehrlichman's claim is likely an oversimplification, according to historians who have studied the period and Nixon's drug policies in particular. There's no doubt Nixon was racist, and historians told me that race could have (played one role in Nixon's drug war. But there are also signs that Nixon wasn't solely motivated by politics or race: For one, he personally despised drugs — to the point that it's not surprising he would want to rid the world of them. And there's evidence that Ehrlichman felt bitter and betrayed by Nixon after he spent time in prison over the Watergate scandal, so he may have lied.

More importantly, Nixon's drug policies did not focus on the kind of criminalization that Ehrlichman described. Instead, Nixon's drug war was largely a public health crusade — one that would be reshaped into the modern, punitive drug war we know today by later administrations, particularly President Ronald Reagan.

None of that means that the drug war hasn't disproportionately hurt black Americans. It clearly has. But the lessons of Nixon's drug policies may not be so much that he was a racist, power-hungry politician — although, again, he was — but rather that even well-meaning policies can have big, terrible unintended consequences.

Hope it helps! And please give me brainliest pleasse?

Answer:

Description of Criminal Act: A man with a gun forcefully pushed a man who was stopped at a red light off of his motorcycle. The gunman then hopped on the motorcycle and sped off.

Type of Crime: Robbery

Property or Violent Crime:

Violent (The man had a "gun", this could be a threat of harm. Making the other man not to fight the gunman for his bike back. The gunman then forcefully pulled the man off his motorcycle.

Explanation:

Federal courts would be permitted to hear cases under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction if the following conditions are met:

Under diversity jurisdiction, the federal courts have the authority to hear civil cases between citizens of different states, even if the issues involved are based on state law. This allows for a neutral federal forum to resolve disputes between parties from different states, providing an alternative to state courts.

It's important to note that diversity jurisdiction only applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Additionally, there are certain exceptions and additional requirements that may apply in specific situations. Consulting with an attorney or referring to current legal statutes and precedents would provide the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding diversity jurisdiction.

To know more about Federal courts

brainly.com/question/31037815

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

hope this helps! ＼(⌒▽⌒)

can i have brainliest???

Answer:

Bullying has 4 effects in the workplace.

Explanation:

The first effect is that it can lower morale, belief, and determination. It can even result in such low confidence, the worker quits. Secondly, bullying in the workplace can make the victim perform poorly, lowering the business' reputation and opportunities for fame and popularity. Bullying in the workplace also results in the bosses, CEOs, or employers firing the victims when he or she performs poorly as a result of the bullying. Lastly, bullying, when caught, causes the attacker's long-term reputation to be ruined.

False. African Americans account for around 28% of Part 1 violent crime arrests in the United States, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's 2018 Crime in the United States report.

This is a large overrepresentation, as African Americans make up only around 13% of the U.S. population. Other reports, such as the Bureau of Justice Statistics' 2018 Source and Use of Firearms in Violent Crimes, have similarly found that African Americans are overrepresented in violent crime arrests.

The reasons for this overrepresentation are complex and multifaceted, but can largely be attributed to systemic racism and inequality within the criminal justice system.

African Americans are more likely to be arrested for violent crimes than whites, for example, due to aggressive policing tactics and harsher sentences for black offenders. Additionally, African Americans are more likely to live in poverty, which can lead to higher crime rates in certain areas.

Know more about Federal Bureau of Investigation's here

https://brainly.com/question/30228839#

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. Formal operational thinkers - 1. They test their hypotheses with judiciously chosen questions and tests.

A. Concrete operational thinkers - 2. They fail to understand the relation between a hypothesis and a well-chosen test of it.

Explanation:

Formal operational thinkers - They test their hypotheses with judiciously chosen questions and tests. Concrete operational thinkers - They fail to understand the relation between a hypothesis and a well-chosen test of it.

Hypothetical-deductive reasoning In hypothetical-deductive reasoning, a hypothesis is put forward and then tested to determine if it is correct or not. In this way, hypothetical-deductive reasoning is useful in establishing cause-and-effect relationships between variables. It is a method of scientific reasoning that is used to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Types of Thinkers in  Formal Operational Thinkers Formal operational thinkers are individuals who can think hypothetically and abstractly. They can hypothesize about different possibilities and can plan and execute experiments to test their hypotheses. They use logical thinking and reasoning to evaluate information and come to a conclusion that is based on facts and evidence. They test their hypotheses with judiciously chosen questions and tests. Concrete Operational Thinkers Concrete operational thinkers, on the other hand, are not able to think abstractly or hypothetically. They focus on the here and now and do not consider the future or the past. They fail to understand the relation between a hypothesis and a well-chosen test of it.

To know more about hypothetical-deductive visit:

brainly.com/question/7997889

#SPJ11

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

The tax act recently vetoed by the President is not necessarily dead. For the act to be passed despite the presidential veto, it will require a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The vetoing of a tax act by the President does not mean that the act is dead. However, it implies that the bill is not yet law. A vetoed bill can still become law if Congress overrides the veto. A bill can be vetoed by the president of the United States, but it can be overridden by Congress. If both the House and Senate vote to override the veto with a two-thirds majority, the bill becomes law without the president's signature.

For the bill to become law, Congress must override the veto. The House of Representatives and the Senate must have a two-thirds majority vote in order to override a presidential veto. The bill then becomes law without the president's signature. Here are the steps for the act to be passed:

1. The House and Senate will reconsider the tax act following the presidential veto.

2. Both chambers must pass the tax act with a two-thirds majority vote.

3. If the two-thirds majority is achieved in both the House and Senate, the tax act will become law despite the President's veto.

Learn more about Vetoed:

https://brainly.com/question/29549392

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. to keep the house from catching on fire

Explanation:

Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.

When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.

An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.

In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.

So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Answer:

The Nation's 911 System

The FCC has taken a number of steps to increase public safety by encouraging and coordinating development of a nationwide, seamless communications system for emergency services

Explanation:

Answer:

The purpose of the 911 Act is to improve public safety by encouraging and facilitating the prompt deployment of a nationwide, seamless communications infrastructure for emergency services. One provision of the 911 Act directs the FCC to make 911 the universal emergency number for all telephone services.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

pls make brainliest :]

And have an amazing day <3

Answer:

Answer Expert Verified The statement that best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses is “Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.”

What best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. ... He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.

WAS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?

MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST

They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals. He was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution. Read the excerpt from The Federal Farmer.

A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or another sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.

A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that the state is governed by. It provides an overview of the state's primary institutions and outlines their interrelationships (for example, between the executive, legislature, and judiciary).

The members of the provincial assemblies chosen by the Indian populace formed the Constituent Assembly of India, which drafted the Constitution. The first president of the Constituent Assembly was Dr. Sachidanand Sinha. Eventually, it elected Dr. Rajendra Prasad as president.

Learn more about the Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ2

Contempt of court, libel, and slander are legal terms referring to different offenses.

Contempt of court involves disrespecting court authority, libel refers to written defamatory statements, and slander involves spoken defamatory statements.

Contempt of court occurs when someone disobeys or shows disrespect to a court's authority or its proceedings. This may include, but is not limited to, failing to follow court orders, disrupting court proceedings, or making disrespectful remarks about the court or its officers.

Libel is a form of defamation in which false and damaging statements are made about a person or entity in writing or published materials. This can harm the subject's reputation and potentially lead to legal consequences for the publisher.

Slander is a form of defamation where false and damaging statements are spoken about a person or entity. Like libel, slander can harm the subject's reputation and result in legal consequences for the speaker. Both libel and slander aim to protect individuals and entities from unwarranted harm to their reputation.

To know more about defamatory statements click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/13264091#

#SPJ11

New sentencing options that are less expensive than incarceration but more punitive than regular probation are often referred to as intermediate sanctions.

Intermediate sanctions are designed to provide a range of options between probation and imprisonment, and they are typically used for offenders who are not serious enough to warrant prison time but require more supervision and control than regular probation can provide.
Intermediate sanctions can take various forms, such as house arrest, electronic monitoring, community service, restitution, fines, drug treatment, and intensive supervision probation. These sanctions aim to hold offenders accountable for their actions, deter them from committing new crimes, and rehabilitate them by addressing the underlying issues that contribute to their criminal behavior.
Intermediate sanctions have gained popularity in recent years due to their cost-effectiveness, as they are less expensive than incarceration, and their ability to reduce recidivism rates. However, they are not suitable for all offenders, and their effectiveness depends on the quality of the programs and services available to offenders. Overall, intermediate sanctions offer a promising alternative to traditional sentencing options and can help reduce the burden on the criminal justice system.

To know more about intermediate sanctions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31655684

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Sources of law do not include instructions from the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce. While the Chamber of Commerce can provide guidance and recommendations to its members and the community, it does not have the legal authority to create or enforce laws.

The sources of law in this scenario include:

The new state constitution approved by voters in North Carolina. This is a fundamental source of law that establishes the framework for government and the legal system.

The new ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council. These are local laws that are created and enforced by the city government.

The new rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation. These are administrative regulations that are created by government agencies to implement and enforce laws and policies.

Overall, sources of law include constitutional provisions, statutory law, administrative law, and common law, which are created through court decisions. Instructions or guidance from private entities such as the Chamber of Commerce do not hold the force of law.

Yes, voters in North Carolina approved a new state constitution.

This new constitution affects many aspects of law, including ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council, rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation, and instructions sent out by the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce.

Sources of law do not include the new state constitution, ordinances, rules, and instructions mentioned above, but rather come from the U.S. Constitution, state laws, state court decisions, and federal laws and regulations.

These sources are all recognized as legitimate forms of law and can be used to help interpret and make decisions.

To know more about federal laws click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14867447#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Consumer protection

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The NRC licenses and regulates the Nation's civilian use of radioactive materials to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety and to promote the common defense and security and to protect the environment.

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is 1.

Explanation:

200/200

=1