If y'all could vote who would you vote for and why?

Answer:

Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hold on a sec I got it

Anarchists are those who advocate for or actively promote anarchy.

Anarchism is a political ideology and movement that rejects any reasons for authority and strives to destroy the structures that it believes sustain unnecessarily strong hierarchy and coercion, which frequently includes, but is not limited to, governments, nation states, and capitalism.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, a socialist pioneer and French political writer, was the first person to voluntarily identify as an anarchist. In his contentious examination of society's economic underpinnings, Qu'est-ce que la propriété? Proudhon maintained that the actual laws of society have nothing to do with authority (1840; What Is Property?)

The notion of "propaganda of the deed," which first came into existence, was a critical milestone in the history of anarchism. Italian anarchists believed that "the insurrectionary action intended to assert socialist beliefs through acts, is the most powerful form of dissemination," as Errico Malatesta stated in 1876.

To learn more about anarchy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19763612

#SPJ4

The appointment of Supreme Court justices on the basis of ideology and politics has become a highly contentious issue in the United States. While some argue that justices should be appointed based on qualifications and experience, others believe that ideology and politics should play a role in the appointment process.

In my opinion, Supreme Court justices should be appointed primarily based on their qualifications and experience. The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that laws passed by Congress are constitutional. Justices must be knowledgeable about the law and have a deep understanding of legal principles and precedent to be able to make informed decisions that have significant impacts on American society.

An appointment based solely on ideology and politics could lead to a biased interpretation of the law, which would be detrimental to the American people. Justices should not be swayed by political or personal biases, but rather be guided by the law and Constitution.The appointment of Supreme Court justices based on qualifications and experience leads to a more just society.

This ensures that decisions made by the Supreme Court are based on legal principles and not on political or personal biases. When justices are appointed based on their qualifications and experience, they are better equipped to make informed decisions that have a positive impact on society as a whole. Ultimately, the goal of the Supreme Court is to ensure that justice is served and that the rights of all Americans are protected. By appointing justices based on qualifications and experience, we can ensure that the Supreme Court is fulfilling this goal.

To know more about f Supreme Court visit-

brainly.com/question/14397303

#SPJ11

The two key elements in the definition of police corruption are misuse of authority.

Police corruption is best defined as the misuse of power and pursuit of personal gain. Police officers who abuse their position or authority for individual or institutional gain are said to be abusing their authority. This can involve behaviors like taking bribes using excessive force, or engaging in extortion.

Personal gain is any benefit that a police officer receives in exchange for their actions or inactions, including cash, gifts or favors. Police corruption threatens the credibility and integrity of law enforcement organizations, which can have a serious impact on public safety and public confidence in the criminal justice system.

Learn more about police corruption at:

brainly.com/question/31563359

#SPJ4

The judicial branch of Georgia is responsible for interpreting Georgia law to determine if it is constitutional delivers justice through our legal system and interprets state laws.

A law's interpretation, practical application, and compliance with the Constitution are all matters that fall under the purview of the judicial branch. The Constitution is our country's supreme law. The judicial branch includes the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the country's highest court.

Laws are enacted by the legislative branch. Laws are enforced by the executive branch. Laws are interpreted by the judicial branch.

Our legal system is administered by Georgia's judicial branch, which also interprets state legislation. The Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals are the two appellate-level courts in our judicial system.

Learn more about The Judicial Branch here:

https://brainly.com/question/17479440

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes it was a homicide and yes the two girls should be charged as adults.

Explanation:

Based on the given information, these activities is considered intentional murder, and the two girls will be charged as adults.

Intentional murder refers to an act of killing attempted by an individual in order to harm another person knowingly. unintentional murder is referred as harming another person mistakenly in self-defense.

In the given case, it is explained that  The two 13-year-old girls are charged with purposefully attacking a classmate in order to kill her. The girls planned to murder their friend with respect to Slender Man after discovering him on a website.

The woman walked out of the woods where she had been placed despite having many stab wounds. Based on the woman's conditions and her statement the two girls are charged with homicide as they did the action in whole senses.

Learn more about intentional murder, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28460422

#SPJ2

Answer:

It’s probably

Explanation:

C

Answer: the answer is B: a designer hat hasn't been paid for her work

Explanation:

because

A: is vandalism

C: is assault or battery

D: is scamming or credit card fraud

so B is the answer

thank you for your time.      

ghost out

According to social control theory, anyone can perceive the benefits of crime and be creative enough to devise and carry out any number of illegal acts spontaneously, without any extra drive or preparation.

The underlying premise is that the desire to engage in criminal activity is resisted due to the costs involved. Additionally, it is presumptuous to believe that the rejection of the people a potential offender cares about is one of crime's greatest costs.

Criminological theories concentrate on outlining why crimes occur. They highlight risk factors for committing a crime, explain why some people commit crimes and can concentrate on the methods and justifications used to enact and uphold particular laws.

The psychodynamic theory, the behavioral theory, and the cognitive theory are the three main psychological theories of time that have evolved after three decades of research.

Learn more about criminological theories, from:

brainly.com/question/5137629

#SPJ1

Sasha was arrested for drinking and driving and pleads guilty in court. This was the example of the probation. Thus, option (4) is correct.

The term court refers to the hiring of the cases of the criminal, civil, and financial scandal matter in the justice of the victim and the punishment of the criminal. The court was the solved the dispute. There are the different types of the court are the district court, supreme court and the higher court.

This case was the clearly example of the case in the probation, because Sasha was arrested for drinking and driving case are the illegal for the alcohol-related case in the police was the arrested guilty in court.

Therefore, option (4) is correct.

Learn more about on court, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ1

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Answer:chciekn

Explanation:

According to the National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) of the United States, it is a legal requirement to receive tags with live molluscs and keep them on file for 90 days because of food safety concerns.

The tags are intended to provide traceability of the molluscs from harvest to consumer. They contain important information about the source of the molluscs, including the location of harvest, the date of harvest, and the name and permit number of the harvester.

By keeping the tags on file for 90 days, the authorities can track the source of any potential foodborne illness outbreak associated with the molluscs. If a consumer falls ill after consuming molluscs, the authorities can use the tag information to identify the source and take appropriate action to prevent further illnesses.

To know more about National Shellfish Sanitation Program, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20420634

#SPJ4

Answer: to test the drug content in the blood

Explanation:Option C

Answer:

i would say a military career :) sorry if it's not right

Explanation:

Answer:

a military career

Explanation:

because when doing a b and c is a one time thing doing a millinery career can take up from1 year+

Answer:

MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.

The given statement, "The only designation a group needs in order to be legally labeled as a terrorist group is a hierarchal structure of organization," is false (F) because a hierarchal structure of organization is not the only designation required to be labeled as a terrorist group.

The legal definition of terrorism varies between countries and organizations. In some cases, a group may be labeled as a terrorist group based on their ideology, goals, tactics, and history of violence, regardless of their organizational structure. For example, the US Department of State designates foreign terrorist organizations based on their commitment to terrorist activity, rather than their organizational structure.

Similarly, the United Nations defines terrorism as "criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public," without requiring a specific organizational structure. Therefore, the presence of a hierarchal structure is not the sole determinant for a group to be legally labeled as a terrorist group.

Learn more about terrorism: https://brainly.com/question/30091189

#SPJ11

c. necessary because gay fathers are as likely to have one stay-at-home partner as heterosexual couples with children.

Offering family-friendly work-life programs and benefits to same-sex couples is necessary because gay fathers, like heterosexual couples with children, are as likely to have one partner staying at home to take care of the children.

It recognizes that same-sex couples can have children and that they face similar challenges and responsibilities as heterosexual couples when it comes to raising a family. Providing family-friendly policies and benefits helps create a more inclusive and supportive work environment for all employees, regardless of their sexual orientation or marital status.

To know more about heterosexual couples:- https://brainly.com/question/29910198

#SPJ11

Answer: #\(Game On\)

Explanation:

Cristiano Ronaldo

Answer:

C ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔

Answer:

minimum- security

Explanation:

have a good day

hope it helps you

The lex mercatoria served as an impartial set of guidelines for resolving economic disputes across national boundaries and political divides.

Business disputes call for specialized expertise and knowledge. Huber Thomas Law is dedicated to attaining outcomes for our clients when a business disagreement arises. We have experience defending clients in legal cases involving contractual breaches, fiduciary duty violations, fraudulent transactions, and many other kinds of business disputes.

We are familiar with these challenging matters since we have tried many of them in state and federal courts all around the country. If you're dealing with one of these legal issues, you need to be aware of this.

A commercial dispute is, in its most basic sense, any disagreement between two distinct business entities (individuals or corporations). One of the most typical legal concerns for firms is a commercial disagreement.

Learn more about economic disputes with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/29315300

#SPJ1

Once a trial starts, the parties can still choose to settle the lawsuit instead of relying on the jury's decision. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the trial process. So, the statement is false.

False. Once a trial starts, the parties still have the option to settle the lawsuit even if the trial is ongoing. Settling a lawsuit means that the parties reach an agreement and resolve their dispute outside of court. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the litigation process, including during an ongoing trial.

In fact, many lawsuits are settled before reaching a final verdict from the jury. Settling a case allows the parties to have control over the outcome and potentially avoid the risks and costs associated with a lengthy trial. Settlement agreements are typically reached through negotiations between the parties and may involve compromises and concessions.

It is important to note that once a trial reaches a verdict, the decision of the jury is binding and the parties must abide by it, unless there are grounds for appeal or other legal remedies. However, prior to the jury reaching a verdict, the parties retain the ability to settle the lawsuit and avoid the uncertainties of a trial outcome.

Learn more about lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30705473

#SPJ11

Answer:

With privacy laws put into place, it's not ethical for employers to view personal information through emails but is absolutely possible if need be, provided that the employer has a solid policy in place informing employees that no information sent or received on company equipment is private.

I personally don't believe that a company should fire an employee over a social media post UNLESS what they're doing is illegal or dangerous. However, employers can fire employees for anything, including their social media posts.

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari all afford stability and predictability to the law. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning “the thing speaks for itself” and it is a rule of evidence used in civil suits. The rule allows for an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant.

Stare decisis is a legal principle in which a court should follow its previous decisions when the same legal issues arise. Certiorari is a type of writ (order) used by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Stare decisis affords stability and predictability to the law.

The concept of stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It is the principle of determining points of law according to precedent. The term is applied in the sense that courts should follow the principles they had established earlier in making judgments.

It provides that a court should follow the rules and principles made by it in a previous decision that has similar facts and issues. This will provide stability and predictability to the law. It ensures the continuity of the law and helps in maintaining stability and consistency in its application.

Other options: Res ipsa loquitur: This is a legal doctrine that allows the court to presume negligence without the plaintiff providing direct evidence of negligence. This does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Clemency is the act of mercy or leniency shown by the authorities to a person who has committed a crime.

This is not a legal doctrine and does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Certiorari is a writ or order from a higher court to a lower court or tribunal directing it to send up the record of a particular case for review. It does not afford stability and predictability to the law.

To know more about Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12177870#

#SPJ11

The best option is option a that is great British pound. In order to calculate the exchange rate between the USD and GBP, the GBP would go in the numerator of the fraction.

This means that you would divide 1 USD by the current exchange rate for GBP/USD. This calculation would give you the amount of USD that you would receive for each GBP that you exchanged. In explanation, exchange rates are always quoted in terms of the amount of one currency that is needed to purchase a unit of another currency. The currency in the numerator is the currency that you are buying, and the currency in the denominator is the currency that you are selling. In conclusion, when analyzing the USD compared to the GBP, the GBP would go in the numerator of the exchange rate calculation.

to know about exchange rate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31848733

#SPJ11

Answer:

Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. identity theft

Explanation:

A financial crime can be defined as any form of criminal activity perpetrated by an individual or illegitimate business organization for the purpose of acquiring illegal financial gains or benefits. These criminal activities have a negative impact on the growth and development of the economy.

Some examples of the most common form of financial crimes experienced around the world are money laundering, identity theft, corruption, and terrorist financing.

Hence, the various types of financial crimes include the following;

I. Embezzlement.

II. Money laundering.

III. Tax evasion.

IV. Insurance fraud.

V. Identity theft.

Identity theft can be defined as situation in which a person uses another person's details or personal informations without an express permission while engaging in an illegitimate activity. Also, identity theft is an act of deceit which involves a misrepresentation of an event, issue or situation.

In this scenario, Rhonda breaks her arm while skateboarding but she told her boss that she slipped and fell while working. Thus, the type of financial crime she is trying to commit is an identity theft.

Answer:

D. Insurance fraud

Explanation:

I promise this is the answer I just took the test.

Insurance fraud: Insurance fraud occurs when someone reports a fake car accident, fire, or injury. They then file a claim to collect the insurance money. Insurance fraud includes overstated claims as well. This happens when a reported event did occur, but the individual tries to get a larger amount by overstating the damage.