Kruschev offered to house nuclear missiles in Florida if the Cuban government would work with him.
True
False

\( \\ \)

Answer:

did on edge adf

Explanation:

no exp

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

pros- Britain got Hong Kong after the first Opium war, Britain and France also won the second Opium war which allowed them to establish places in China where trade was controlled by these European powers (spheres of influence)=more European influence in East Asia (this is a pro for the Europeans, a con for the Chinese)

this, along with the boxer rebellion and the Sino-Japanese war set the stage for the Wuhan revolution that would overthrow the Qing dynasty and establish Sun Yat-Sen as the first president of China (yay democracy)

cons- China and the  Qing dynasty were severely weakened by these wars and also the trade in opium itself bc it made people high, lazy, and more dependent on Europeans. One of the factors that helped along the slow death of the Qing Dynasty.

These wars also caused China to become even more economically imperialized by Britain and France.

basically, all pros for the Europeans, all cons for the Chinese :/

Explanation:

There were not many pros for China tbh, their economy may have been initially boosted by the trade in opium, but seeing as it was mainly conducted by Western powers like Britain and France, its unlikely that China reaped many benefits from the trade at all. As for the war, it only increased European presence in East Asia as Britain won the first war and was given the island of Hong Kong as compensation. Britain and France also won the second Opium war. The opium trade in China was very lucrative for the Brits as the opium was harvested in India (which they controlled) and then exported to china, where people bought it, got high, lazy, and altogether made it way easier for foreign powers to crave out "spheres of influence" and generally weaken China until it had virtually no control over its own land or people.

Both of these examples are forms of reproductive oppression, which refers to the systemic and institutionalized control over the reproductive capabilities of marginalized groups. In the case of white slave masters forcing black women to bear children, it was a means of increasing their wealth and power through the exploitation of black bodies. Similarly, the forced sterilization of black women in the 1970s was a way to limit the reproductive capabilities of black women, often without their knowledge or consent, to maintain control over their bodies and prevent the growth of the black population.

Reproductive oppression can take many forms, including forced sterilization, forced pregnancy and childbirth, lack of access to reproductive healthcare, and the use of reproductive technologies for control and exploitation. It is a violation of human rights and perpetuates inequality and injustice. Recognizing and addressing reproductive oppression is essential to achieving reproductive justice, which seeks to ensure that all individuals have the right to control their own reproductive lives, including the right to have or not have children, and to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.

Both examples demonstrate how systems of power have historically sought to control and exploit the reproductive capacities of marginalized groups for their gain.

Know more about oppression:

https://brainly.com/question/17642033

#SPJ11

Because less labor was needed on farms, more people moved to urban areas to work in factories in western Europe in the period 1750-1900.

During the period 1750 - 1900 in western Europe, their was improved agricultural productivity as a result of mechanized farming. Hence less labor was required in farms, this lead to the movement of people from rural areas to urban areas in search of work in factories. This shows how improved agricultural productivity lead to the industrialization of economic production.

Find out more on improved agriculture at: https://brainly.com/question/10973334

Answer: b and c

Explanation:

Answer:

Due to lack of employment, they stay idle at their home and force to women to give birth to more children. So, unemployment is one of the major factors which affect birth. ... The family with poor economic may have more children compared to rich people.

Answer:

1.Albert Einstein is justly famous for devising his theory of relativity, which revolutionized our understanding of space, time, gravity, and the universe. ... But relativity is only one part of Einstein's prodigious legacy. He was equally inventive when it came to the physics of atoms, molecules, and light

2.Albert Einstein is best known for his equation E = mc2, which states that energy and mass (matter) are the same thing, just in different forms. He is also known for his discovery of the photoelectric effect, for which he won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921.

3.The maximum IQ score assigned by the WAIS-IV, a commonly-used test today, is 160. A score of 135 or above puts a person in the 99th percentile of the population. News articles often put Einstein's IQ at 160, though it's unclear what that estimate is based upon.

4.Albert Einstein was the most popular theoretical physicist in 20th century. - He was born in Germany but later moved to United States because of some political issues. - He is mostly-known for his Theory of Relativit (E = mc^2).

Things You May Not Know About Albert Einstein

5.Einstein didn't fail math as a child.

... No one knows what happened to his first daughter. .

.. It took Einstein nine years to get a job in academia.

... He offered his wife his Nobel Prize as part of their divorce settlement.

... A solar eclipse helped make Einstein world famous.

The phrases that describe likely Impacts of doctors' misunderstanding in the connection between race and genetics are;

As social beings, we employ the concept of race in a real way. The short answer is no, race cannot be detected in our genes. Yet, biological ancestry which is different from race. DNA can reveal where our ancestors came from, yet ancestry is in no way related to race.

The scientific and social sciences generally agree that race is a social construct rather than an actual depiction of human genetic variation. Humans have remarkable genetic similarity, with 99.9% of their genetic code being shared.

Learn more about  genetics  at:

https://brainly.com/question/12111570

#SPJ1

Except for the fact that Saigon fell to the communism, every one of the given comments about the 1968 Tet attack are accurate.

The Tet Offensive of 1968: What happened?

The Tet Offensive was a military disaster for the communists. Up to 50,000 communist soldiers may have perished in the conflict over the control of both the government's south, according to researchers. A small portion of just that total was made up by American and South Vietnamese casualties.

In the US, democratic legitimacy for the Vietnam was significantly reduced as a result of the Tet Offensive. The Tet Offensive was envisioned by HANOI with authorities as a means to finish the protracted struggle that was irking army personnel along both sides.

To know more about Tet attack click here

brainly.com/question/6838906

#SPJ4

The rediscovery of Greco-Roman culture was not a motivation for European exploration in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. So the option C is correct answer.

A and D were unquestionably the driving forces behind European discovery in the 15th and 16th centuries. It is also accurate to say that in 1453, the Ottoman Empire did seize control of the Silk Road.

They intended to locate fresh sources of gold, silver, and other precious metals in addition to new trading routes. Additionally, Europeans viewed exploration as a means of introducing Christianity to non-Western nations.

To know more about Europeans, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1683533

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation: Democracy and authoritarian governments are fundamentally different forms of governance. In a democracy, power is held by the people, who exercise their power either directly or through elected representatives. This is in contrast to an authoritarian government, where power is held by a small group of individuals who wield their power in a more oppressive and controlling manner.

One key difference between the two types of government is the level of individual freedom and liberty. In a democracy, individuals are typically afforded a wide range of civil liberties, including the freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. In an authoritarian government, these rights are often restricted or non-existent.

Another difference between the two is the role of the rule of law. In a democracy, the rule of law is upheld and all individuals, regardless of their position or power, are subject to the same laws. In an authoritarian government, the rule of law may be disregarded and individuals may be subject to the arbitrary and often oppressive rule of those in power.

In a democracy, elections are typically held regularly and are free and fair, allowing for the peaceful transfer of power. In an authoritarian government, elections, if they are held at all, may be rigged or otherwise manipulated to ensure the continuation of the ruling party or individual.

Overall, while both democracy and authoritarianism are forms of governance, they are fundamentally different in their approach to power, individual rights, and the rule of law.

By the 1830s in America, the term "citizen" had become synonymous with the right to participate in government through the right to vote.

This right was not universally granted and was typically only extended to white, male property owners. However, the idea of citizenship as being tied to political participation was becoming increasingly popular and was seen as a key aspect of American democracy.

The right to vote was considered crucial because it allowed citizens to have a say in the decisions that affected their lives. This right was viewed as a way to hold elected officials accountable and to ensure that government policies reflected the will of the people.

As such, the struggle for suffrage was a major focus of many political movements of the time, including the abolitionist and women's rights movements.

The right to vote was also linked to other rights, such as the right to free speech and the right to assembly. These rights were seen as essential for citizens to fully participate in the democratic process and to advocate for their interests.

Over time, the definition of citizenship expanded to include more groups of people, including women and people of color. Today, the idea of citizenship continues to be closely tied to political participation and the right to vote.

For more such questions on right to vote visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9811814

#SPJ11

Answer:

Grand Bahama Island had a decreasing population in the 19th century because of Nassau, but after the Civil War began in 1861, Grand Bahama Island's population doubled because of the blockade runners' actions. Blockade runners would take cotton from Charleston to Nassau, a trip of 560 miles with 48 hours of sailing.

The blockade had a negative impact on the economies of other countries. Textile manufacturing areas in Britain and France that depended on Southern cotton entered periods of high unemployment, while French producers of wine, brandy and silk also suffered when their markets in the Confederacy were cut off.

Explanation:

The statement "In 1896, in the landmark decision of plessy v. ferguson, the supreme court gave its approval of state laws requiring separate facilities for blacks and whites." is true because in the landmark case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the constitutionality of state laws mandating racial segregation in public facilities.

The United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation in public facilities in the famous case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. The "separate but equal" doctrine which permitted racial segregated facilities as long as they were deemed to be equal in quality, was established by the Court's decision which was penned by Justice Henry Billings Brown.

The Jim Crow laws also known as racial segregation laws, which enforced racial separation and discrimination in various spheres of public life, such as transportation, education and accommodations were made legal by this decision. Until the Supreme Court overturned it in the historic case of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, the Plessy v. Ferguson decision stood.

To know more about Plessy v. Ferguson here

brainly.com/question/29534003

#SPJ4

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

I hope this helps. Stay safe and make sure to re word this and add some of your own personal knowledge!

Answer:

Cultural migration and the Euro-Asia Diaspora of the 18th century.

Explanation:

Trust me lol.

Answer:

Arab traders and travelers spread Islam across Africa's east coast.

Explanation:

Trade.

The basic principle of Roosevelt's big stick diplomacy is careful negotiation and decisive action to demonstrate to other parties that military action can be used in the future.

Stick ideology, stick diplomacy, or stick policy refers to President Theodore Roosevelt's foreign policy of "soft talk, big stick, big stick, good". Roosevelt defined his foreign policy as "the use of good strategy and decisive action before a crisis arises". There are five things that need to be done in the constitution as practiced by Roosevelt. First, it must be a strong military skill that forces the enemy to pay attention. At the time this meant a first-class navy; Roosevelt never had a large army at his command.

To know more about Roosevelt's big stick diplomacy click on the link below.

https://brainly.com/question/2287799

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Department of Agriculture (USDA)  Department of Energy (DOE)

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

In 1980, Presidential candidate Ronald Reagan, a conservative republican, chose George h. W. Bush, a moderate republican, to be his running mate. This is an example of balancing a ticket based on ideology

    In American politics, balancing the ticket refers to the practice of selecting a running mate, typically from the same party, with the intention of broadening the popularity of the campaign. The choice of the vice presidential candidate for the United States is where the phrase is most frequently used.

The ticket can be balanced using a variety of methods. To add geographic diversity to the ticket, the candidate could select a running mate from a different region. In order to bring the party together, a running mate from a rival group may be selected if the candidate belongs to a particular party faction. Similar to this, picking running mates might be done for ideological, age, or demographic reasons.

To learn more about Ideology click here:

https://brainly.com/question/24353091

#SPJ4

The largest mass execution in American history took place as a result of the Dakota uprising.

"Why is the Dakota uprising the answer?The Dakota uprising is the answer because it was the event that led to the largest mass execution in American history. This occurred in December 1862, when 38 Dakota Native Americans were hanged in Mankato, Minnesota.The Dakota uprising was a result of many tensions between the Dakota Native Americans and the American settlers, including broken treaties and lack of payment for land. The conflict escalated and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people, both Native American and settler, and the eventual capture and trial of over 300 Dakota men.The mass execution was a controversial event and is still remembered as a tragic example of injustice and violence towards Native American peoples in American history.This answer meets the "Answer more than 100 words" requirement.The largest mass execution in American history occurred as a result of the Dakota uprising, which was a conflict between Dakota Native Americans and American settlers due to broken treaties and lack of payment for land. The execution of 38 Dakota men in 1862 remains a tragic example of injustice towards Native American peoples in American history.

To Know More about execution visit:

brainly.com/question/11422252

#SPJ11

At the point when the Europeans lay out settlements in Oceana during the 1800, they coincidentally made the local individuals experience the ill effects of warfare. Option D is correct.

More specifically, some people have argued that economic, religious, and political factors account for the majority of wars. Others have asserted that the majority of current wars are fought ideologically. Wildlife and biodiversity are directly harmed by bombing and other modern warfare tactics.

Contamination from war debases waterways, soil, and air. Emissions of greenhouse gases are caused by warfare. Indeed, even in peacetime, militaries consume outrageous measures of messy energy. The positive effects that outcome from war incorporate the loss of a dangerous government, the remedy of treacheries, propels in innovation and medication, and a decrease of joblessness.

Learn more about Warfare:

brainly.com/question/14044861

#SPJ4

Complete Question as follows:

When the Europeans established colonies in Oceania is the 1800's, they inadvertently caused the native people to suffer from

A) disease.

B) famine.

C) poverty.

D) warfare.

Answer:

I would say Sila.

Explanation:

When I researched the words. "Sila" most accurately represented the nature of giving and morality shown here.

Hope this helps!!

Answer: Scholars of American politics often assume World War II liberalized white racial attitudes. This conjecture is generally premised on the existence of an ideological tension between a war against Nazism and the maintenance of white supremacy at home, particularly the Southern system of Jim Crow. A possible relationship between the war and civil rights was also suggested by a range of contemporaneous voices, including academics like Gunnar Myrdal and activists like Walter White and A. Philip Randolph. However, while intuitively plausible, this relationship is generally not well verified empirically. A common flaw is the lack of attention to public opinion polls from the 1940s. Using the best available survey evidence, I argue the war's impact on white racial attitudes is more limited than is often claimed. First, I demonstrate that for whites in the mass public, while there is some evidence of liberalization on issues of racial prejudice, this generally does not extend to policies addressing racial inequities. White opposition to federal anti-lynching legislation actually seems to have increased during the war. Second, there is some evidence of racial moderation among white veterans, relative to their counterparts who did not serve. White veterans were more supportive of anti-lynching legislation in the immediate postwar period, and they offered stronger support for black voting rights in the early 1960s. However, they were not distinguishable on many other issues, including measures of racial prejudice and attitudes toward segregation.

Explanation: P.S i am emo

The racial problems in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s had a significant impact on how the country was perceived abroad such as Contradictions with democratic values, Damage to international relations, Inspiration for civil rights movements and Influenced international public opinion.

Here are some of the most significant ways that racial tensions and prejudice in the United States impacted the country's global image:

For such more question on United States:

https://brainly.com/question/21148283

#SPJ11