_____________ law developed in England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges.

The primary source of federal power to regulate trade between states is the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

This clause, found in Article 1, Section 8, gives Congress the authority to regulate commerce among the several states. This means that Congress can pass laws that regulate the flow of goods, services, and people between states, as well as laws that govern interstate transactions. The Commerce Clause has been interpreted broadly by the Supreme Court, allowing Congress to regulate a wide range of economic activities that affect interstate commerce. However, there have been challenges to this power, with some arguing that it infringes on states' rights and others arguing that it gives the federal government too much power. Nonetheless, the Commerce Clause remains a crucial source of federal power in regulating trade between states.

To know more about Constitution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ11

The Situation Analysis, which evaluates Shandong's environmental issues, economic development, and social variables, forms the base of the pyramid.

The second level highlights Shandong's unique problems, like air pollution, water contamination, and ecological destruction. This level is represented by the Complications. The questions highlighted make up the third level and concentrate on how Shandong can handle these difficulties while maintaining economic growth and enhancing the quality of life for its citizens. Complications arise from the unique problems faced by Shandong, such as air pollution, water contamination, and ecological destruction. Addressing these complications requires a careful balance between economic growth and the well-being of citizens. Here are some questions that can be explored to understand how Shandong can handle these difficulties:

learn more about Situation Analysis here :

https://brainly.com/question/28180478

#SPJ11

Answer:

Yes, avoid blocking passing lanes :)

Answer:

huh? hjsjusnahsusknsusjsnhsiqmanysiendggsins

personification type of metaphor/simile

Answer:

Explanation:

What is a summon/Where to find it?

Complete the form. The summons document in most courts has a preferred format. Contact the clerk's office if a form or example is not accessible on the court's website. The summons should be "issued." A summons isn't legitimate unless it's signed by the clerk of the court where you filed your complaint.

What do you need in your summon?

Identify who is being sued. You'll need the person, business, or other entity you've designated as a defendant in the lawsuit's entire legal name and address. Each person or entity you are suing must get a separate summons.

Answer:

general election ..............

Answer: True

"To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."

found that thought it might help you

In the cases of isolation of a highly violent offender, overcrowding in the state facility, and request space for an individual soon to be extradited, a state corrections facility may need to seek assistance from a local jail in order to provide adequate safety and security for staff and inmates.

Violence is an extreme form of aggression, such as assault, ra pe or mur der. It involves the use of physical force intended to hurt, damage, or ki ll someone or something. It can also include psychological abuse, such as verbal attacks, humiliation and intimidation. Violence is a serious public health problem that affects individuals, families, and communities. It can lead to physical and emotional harm, as well as long-term psychological damage. It can also have severe economic, social and political consequences.

Housing of individuals serving long sentences is another situation where a state corrections facility may need to seek additional space from a local jail, as many state facilities may not have the capacity to house inmates with long sentences.

To learn more about violent

https://brainly.com/question/29466935

#SPJ1

Answer:

Melinda is required to include the cash prize in the Gross Income.

Explanation:

Gross Income is the total payment in cash, goods and services that a person received before tax reductions, that is, it is the general value of everything that a person received in a given period of time, including wages, premiums, real estate, among other things . In this case, we can confirm that the cash prize received by Melinda must be included in her Gross Income, in addition, if she has received a prize with an economic value, she must also include this prize in the Gross Income, even if she has donated .

Answer:

No. Should be no.

Explanation:

black marketeering has noting to do with prosecution because of theft.

BLACK MARKETEERING:

illegal traffic or trade in officially controlled commodities.

THEFT:

the physical removal of an object that is capable of being stolen without the consent of the owner and with the intention of depriving the owner of it permanently.

Black Marketeering pervention has nothing to do with stealing.

A legal argument based on the notion that a defendant should not be held responsible for an illegal act if it is attributable to mental illness or intellectual disability that interferes with rationality is called an insanity defense.

What is an insanity defense?An insanity defense is a legal defense that argues that the accused was not guilty of the crime owing to insanity at the time of the crime. The defense acknowledges that the accused perpetrated the act, but claims that due to a mental illness, they were unable to understand the wrongfulness of their conduct.In court cases, how is the insanity defense used?

The insanity defense may be employed in court cases where a defendant is charged with a crime, but the defense argues that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense, and thus incapable of knowing that what they were doing was wrong.The insanity defense necessitates the use of psychiatric testimony to support the assertion that the defendant was mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.

Only in specific, severe cases are people allowed to make an insanity defense claim, such as those involving mental disorders or intellectual disabilities that impair or limit cognitive functioning.The most well-known application of the insanity defense in criminal law is in homicide cases, and it's often employed when the defendant has been found to have committed murder but is discovered to have been mentally ill or intellectually disabled at the time of the offense.

To know more about insanity defense refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28249990

#SPJ11

Answer:

During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?

Explanation:

There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.

Answer:

the boy's genes

the history and family dynamics

Explanation:

Behavior, dedication to studies and intelligence, are characteristics that can be highly influenced by the genetics that an individual presents, as well as by the environment in which that individual is inserted. Based on this statement, in order to present conclusions about the boy shown in the question above, the doctor would need to assess the boy's genetic makeup, analyzing the genes and being able to look for how it affects his behavior. However, the doctor will also need to know the dynamics and family history, to know how the environment that the boy is inserted in has influenced him.

Answer:

the shape of the boy’s skull

Explanation:

Option a is incorrect,

Option b is also incorrect,

Option c is the correct answer.

Constitutionalism refers to a system of government where there is a constitution that establishes the powers, limits, and rights of the government. It ensures that the government operates within the framework of the constitution, respecting the rule of law and protecting individual rights. In this context, the options provided can be evaluated.

Option a is incorrect as it suggests that the federal government allows states to have some powers. Constitutionalism does not necessarily involve the federal government allowing powers to states.

Option b is also incorrect as it states that the state surrenders most power to the federal government. Constitutionalism is about establishing a balance of power, not necessarily one entity surrendering most power to another.

Option c is the correct answer as it states that state governments allow the federal government to have some powers. This aligns with the principle of constitutionalism, where power is shared between the state and federal government, with each having their own set of powers and limitations.

The phrase "The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8" is accurate, as it highlights that the federal government's powers are specifically outlined in the constitution, specifically in Article I section 8.

Know more about Constitutionalism here:

https://brainly.com/question/4932085

#SPJ11

Answer:

In Pay, Reference Points, and Police Performance (NBER Working Paper No. 12202), Alexandre Mas maintains that when police officers are awarded salaries ... with low wages, but with wages below a reference point that they consider fair.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes because people would be bad and do things there not supposed too. Sometimes some police officers can do bad things but most of them enjoy there job and like helping people so they should be paid to something thats helping everyone. :)

Explanation:

Schools may not segregate by race was a critical outcome of the Brown v. Board of Education case in 1954. The answer is B

The Brown v. Board of Education case was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in 1954, which declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.

The Court ruled that separate educational facilities for black and white students were inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. This decision overturned the previous "separate but equal" doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and paved the way for desegregation of public schools in the United States.

The decision in Brown v. Board of Education was a critical turning point in the Civil Rights Movement, and it helped to end legal segregation in the United States. It was also an important step toward creating a more equal and just society, as it challenged the notion that separate could ever be equal.

The ruling set an important precedent for future cases that would challenge discrimination and segregation in other areas of American life.

To know more about Brown v. Board of Education, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30820436#
#SPJ11

Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.

The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.

Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.

The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.

In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.

Know more about statistical principle here:

https://brainly.com/question/30592795

#SPJ11

As a result of LaShonda being assaulted while visiting the Six Flags in Georgia, the venue of the criminal case would be Georgia.

The original venue of a criminal case that did not cross state lines would be the state in which the crime was committed.

Even though LaShonda is a resident of Wisconsin, the crime was committed in Georgia which means that the venue would be Georgia.

Find out more on original venues at https://brainly.com/question/342388.

The court which has original jurisdiction over cases involving controversies between two or further countries is the US Supreme Court.

Original jurisdiction is the capacity of a court to hear a case for the first time. It can be distinguished from appellate governance, which is a court's capability to consider a case that a lower court has preliminarily heard and determined.

The Supreme Court's governance — its power to hear cases is established under Composition III, Section II of the Constitution. Certain cases, similar as suits involving two or further countries and/ or cases involving ministers and other public ministers, fall under the Court's original governance.

To learn more on original jurisdiction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13961368

#SPJ4

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

You have just turned 18 in time to vote in the upcoming election. I would you to go ahead and select one of the candidates. The right to vote is one of the most significant liberties enjoyed by citizens of the United States.

Elections offer a crucial chance to advance democracy and promote political liberalization. Certain civil liberties, like the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly, are necessary for an election to be free and fair. Suffrage, or the ability to vote, is a crucial component of our democracy.

Voting is a process that a group, such as an electorate or meeting, can use to reach a consensus or express an opinion, typically after discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Voting is how democracies choose their leaders for high office.

Learn more about Voting here:

https://brainly.com/question/29573892

#SPJ2

Answer:

there are three primary causes of drug use. Within these main causes, there stems a myriad of reasons as to why people start to use drugs. Certain people may face several different factors, which are each, on their own, a reason to use drugs. But these reasons are all the result of some sort of emotional, psychological, or physical categorization of the causes for drug use.

Emotional: Feeling they need drugs to fill a void in their lives (whether it’s stress, trauma, relationship issues or more)

Physical: Feeling like they need the physical effects of a high or low to physically feel better

Psychological: General feelings of inadequacy towards themselves or the world, so they use drugs to boost their confidence and self-esteem and ability to make sense of things

Answer:

Yes, I feel as thou people who are found guilty of a heinous act need to be viable to capital punishment. I say this because the long term affect a crime like that can have on someone. It can cause serious damage and resault in self harm or worse for the victim/ victims familys. There is a never ending line of heinous crimes but being viable for capital sentencing may help stop that line.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps

Have A Great Day

~Zero~

C)A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a court that does not typically hear original trials but focuses on reviewing the decisions and opinions of lower courts. Its primary function is to review and consider appeals from trial courts or lower appellate courts. The opinions rendered by an intermediate appellate court serve as guidance for other state courts, as they establish precedent and can influence future cases. These courts play a crucial role in the judicial system by ensuring consistency and uniformity in the interpretation and application of the law.

To read more about Intermediate Appellate Court click here

https://brainly.com/question/33718034

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. it guarantees the outcome of the populour vote

Answer:

A 5 mile radius

Explanation:

Answer yes it is tight 80 percent