Laws originally intended for use against organized crime can be used to seize certain assets of people convicted of selling obscene material. True or False.

Answer:

...A.) the authority of the supreme court to declare to laws or actions unconstitutional.

yes its true that, evidence against the president trump tried to enlist in a foreign nation, due to election, and prompting congressional democrats in order to launch an inquiry which occured in trump's impeachment on december 18, 2019.

Johnson become the primary United States president to be impeached. After the House officially followed the articles of impeachment, they forwarded them to america Senate for adjudication. The trial withinside the Senate commenced on March 5, with Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase presiding. Three United States presidents were impeached, even though none have been convicted: Andrew Johnson become in 1868, Bill Clinton become in 1998, and Donald Trump twice, in 2019 and 2021.

Presidents, While there were needs for the impeachment of maximum presidents, handiest three — Andrew Johnson in 1868 , Bill Clinton in 1999 and Donald Trump in 2019. A 2nd impeachment of Donald Trump become followed, making him the primary US President to be impeached twice. The House followed articles of impeachment towards Trump: abuse of energy and obstruction of Congress. The Senate acquitted Trump of those expenses on February 5, 2020.

Learn more about impeachment visit: brainly.com/question/25572293

#SPJ4

One of the tools on the court-approved lists issued by the federal judiciary is Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF).

The federal judiciary maintains court-approved lists that outline the tools and systems authorized for use within the courts. Among these lists, one notable tool is Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF). CM/ECF is a comprehensive electronic case management system that allows courts to efficiently manage case information and documents.

It provides a secure and accessible platform for attorneys, judges, and court personnel to file, retrieve, and process case-related documents electronically. CM/ECF enhances the efficiency of court operations by streamlining administrative tasks, improving access to information, and facilitating electronic filing and case management procedures. Its inclusion on the court-approved lists demonstrates its recognition as a trusted and reliable tool for the federal judiciary to handle and maintain case records effectively.

To learn more about attorneys click here, brainly.com/question/32172311

#SPJ11

The one that is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts. Hence, the correct answer is option A

A criminal case is the one that is liable to sentence punishment. A case that is punishable under law of any country. Hence, one is set to be in a criminal case when one is involved in any form of crime. The severity of the crime determines the gravity of the punishment.

To plead guilty implies that one accepts that one did the crime charged. If one pleads guilty, the court will decide what should happen next, which could be a fine or a prison sentence.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts.

learn more about guilty plea: https://brainly.com/question/14334271

#SPJ1

Answer:

true

Explanation:

No, the youth service project or a civic organization or community services does not show sign of weakness rather it portray the willingness to pursue peace as a instrument of integration and a good society .

What is Youth Service Project?

This is a project that works with youth by cultivating relationships trough safe, supportive, and creative programming to maximize their strengths and negative the issues of life in a clear and concise manner.

The Youth service project is designed to work with youth rather than working for the youths in order to bring about integration and participation.

What is Civic organization?

Civic organization is described as a community based company, club, committee, association, corp[oration, or any other organization or group of person who come together on a voluntary basis and which is primarily established to further educational, charitable or religious causes.

Learn more about civic organization here:

https://brainly.com/question/28149882

#SPJ4

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that is enforceable by law.

It is an exchange of promises, services, or goods that the law will enforce. A contract can be written, verbal, or implied. It must contain essential elements such as offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, and legality. The parties must have an intent to be legally bound, and the agreement must be accepted and agreed upon by both parties. The contract must be written clearly and completely, and must be signed by both parties.

All contracts are subject to the laws of the state in which they are entered into. If one of the parties fails to fulfill its obligations, the other party may be able to seek damages or other remedies from them. Contracts are a cornerstone of the legal system and are essential to the functioning of society.

To know more about legal system, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1894269

#SPJ4

Answer:

hunting is not legal but we need to make sure that most animals don't

go extinct but when the growth goes up we need to size down them

Explanation:

The document is called Pleadings.

A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against another party. Only a limited number of laws from long ago that are still in force include the phrase "suit in law." The term "lawsuit" refers to a civil action in which the plaintiff asks the court for a legal or equitable remedy.

The plaintiff's complaint must get a response from the defendant. If the plaintiff wins, a judgment will be rendered in their favor, and the court may then make a number of orders, including those to uphold a right, grant damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to stop or compel action. It is possible to issue a declaratory decision to end future legal problems.

To know more about Lawsuit, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18273856

#SPJ4

I can provide a brief overview of judicial review, its origins, and discuss three significant U.S. Supreme Court cases that have had a profound impact on our country. Let's proceed with that approach.

Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws or government actions that are found to be unconstitutional. The concept of judicial review originated in the United States with the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle that the Supreme Court had the authority to interpret the Constitution and declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

Judicial review serves as a critical check and balance in the U.S. government system, ensuring that the actions of the legislative and executive branches are consistent with the Constitution. It allows the judiciary to safeguard individual rights, uphold constitutional principles, and maintain the balance of power among the branches of government.

Three notable U.S. Supreme Court cases that significantly impacted our country through the use of judicial review are:

1. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): This landmark case addressed racial segregation in public schools. The Supreme Court held that segregation in public education violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling led to the desegregation of schools and played a crucial role in the Civil Rights Movement, dismantling legal segregation and promoting equality in education.

2. Roe v. Wade (1973): This case dealt with the constitutionality of state laws restricting access to abortion. The Court ruled that a woman's right to privacy, protected under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, included the right to choose to have an abortion. This decision established the constitutional right to abortion and has had a profound impact on reproductive rights and women's autonomy in the United States.

3. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015): In this case, the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The Court held that the fundamental right to marry, protected by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, applied to same-sex couples. This decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and marked a significant milestone in LGBTQ+ rights, promoting equality and recognition of same-sex relationships.

In each of these cases, the Supreme Court exercised judicial review to assess the constitutionality of laws or government actions. Through their rulings, the Court interpreted the Constitution and shaped the legal landscape of our country.

Without the Brown v. Board of Education decision, our nation would have continued to grapple with legalized racial segregation in schools, perpetuating inequality and denying equal educational opportunities to minority students. The Roe v. Wade ruling ensured that women have the right to make choices about their reproductive health, and overturning it would have severely restricted access to safe and legal abortions. In the absence of Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex couples would have been denied the recognition and benefits of marriage, leading to continued discrimination and inequality based on sexual orientation.

These cases demonstrate the transformative power of judicial review in shaping our society and upholding constitutional principles. Through the exercise of this power, the Supreme Court has played a crucial role in advancing civil rights, individual liberties, and equality in the United States.

To learn more about judicial review, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28179489

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

here’s what I’ve found on the web! Hope this helps!

Congress cannot, under the guise of an investigation, usurp the power of another branch of government. It cannot investigate matters where the means of redress is purely judicial. Nor can Congress investigate matters committed to the President's discretion.

There are multiple sets direct and cross-examination questions of qustions which could be asked from Robert Craig during his trial.

Direct Examination Questions for Robert Craig (Prosecution)

1) Can you please state your name and occupation for the court?

2) Can you describe your relationship with the victim?

3) On the night of the incident, can you tell us where you were and what you were doing?

4) Did you have any interaction with the victim on the night of the incident?

5) Did you have any motive or reason to harm the victim?

6) Can you describe any physical evidence that may connect you to the crime scene?

7) Have you ever been convicted of a crime before?

8) Did you confess to any involvement in the crime during the investigation?

Cross-Examination Questions for Robert Craig (Defense)

1) Can you describe your relationship with the victim before the incident occurred?

2) Were you ever threatened or harmed by the victim?

3) Can you tell us about any other potential suspects in this case?

4) Were there any eyewitnesses to the crime that can confirm your involvement?

5) Can you explain any inconsistencies in your statements to law enforcement during the investigation?

6) Were you under the influence of drugs or alcohol on the night of the incident?

7) Can you describe any mental health issues that you have been diagnosed with?

8) Were you coerced or threatened during the investigation to confess to the crime?

9) Can you provide any evidence or witnesses that can support your innocence?

Therefore, these are the set of questions that could be used at trial for Robert Craig from the side of the prosecution and the side of the defense.

Learn more about direct and cross-examination questions :

https://brainly.com/question/14837719

#SPJ4

The statement 'Implied powers are outlined in Article III of the Constitution' is false as expressed powers are stated in the Article III but implied powers are not.

The powers that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution, but are essential for the effective functioning of the government, are referred to as implied powers. The powers which are derived from the constitution’s necessary and proper clause are known as the implied powers.

The United States Constitution only grants certain powers to the government. The Constitution's Article I, Section 8 lists the powers of Congress. Implied powers come from the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause, which grants Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers.

A good example of implied powers can be seen in the federal government's ability to create a national bank. A national bank is not explicitly stated as a power of the federal government in the Constitution. However, by creating a national bank, the federal government can carry out its other enumerated powers like collecting taxes, borrowing money, and regulating commerce. This is possible because the Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress the implied power to create a national bank.

Learn more about Implied powers:

https://brainly.com/question/11346328

#SPJ11

In our history, some of the most popular prison gangs includes:

Prison gangs are criminal organizations that form in the penal system and operate within the United States' prison facilities. Each gang has its own set of symbols and ways for members to identify themselves as members of that gang. These prison gangs formed in various prisons over the course of several decades, and they are still active in the prison systems today.

Other facts about prison gang are as follows:

Read more about prison gang

brainly.com/question/28333270

#SPJ1

This os defined as the practice of making unethical or immoral monetary loans that unfairly enrich the lender.

Though he charged very high interest which made him unpopular, he was right to demand for  Antonio's pound of flesh which was written in the contract if he defaults.

'

Read more about  Shylock here https://brainly.com/question/14106055

Offering self-checkout stations can provide customers with a faster and more independent checkout experience, especially for those with a small number of items.

Having enough staff members available at checkout counters can help reduce waiting times and address customer needs promptly.

Conducting routine checks on equipment and ensuring they are in proper working order can minimize technical issues and streamline the checkout process.

Ensuring that checkout staff are trained in efficient scanning and bagging techniques can help expedite the process and improve customer satisfaction.

Implementing technologies like electronic queue displays or mobile apps that allow customers to join a virtual queue can enhance transparency and reduce frustration.

Leaen more about customers on

https://brainly.com/question/26313265

#SPJ1

The party must file a petition for a  writ of certiorari, in order for  the supreme court to review a lower court ruling .

Writ of certiorari is a formal request asking the supreme court to hear their case. The party needs to demonstrate why their case meets the court's criteria for review. The court must decide whether to grant a writ of certiorari and will not do so merely because a party disagrees with the lower court's decision.

The primary criteria for review include whether the issue is a federal question and if the lower court decision conflicts with another court's interpretation of the law. Additionally, the court may consider whether the issue is of " national importance" or if the lower court decision conflicts with a prior decision from the supreme court. the court may  also consider other factors, such as if the petitioner has been denied  the opportunity to present their case in the lower court when filing the  petioton.

The party must provide copies of the lower court decision, any relevant briefs, and records and a statement of reasons why the court should review the lower court decision  

To know more about the supreme court refer to the link  brainly.com/question/224703

#SPJ4

Answer:The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Earl Warren, agreed. In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed the Arizona Supreme Court decision and declared that Miranda's confession could not be used as evidence in a criminal trial.

Explanation:

Answer:

sugar diebetis

Explanation:

As we can say alcohol contain a lot of C6,H12,O6

An individual who is 'agile' would possess all the characteristics except being:

D). Apprehensive

Learn more about 'vocabulary' here:

brainly.com/question/20388659

The laws that permit employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan is "The Pension Protection Act" It allows employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan. The correct option is C) Pension Protection Act

Define contribution plan: In a defined contribution plan, an employer contributes a specific amount or percentage of an employee's salary to a retirement account. The funds in the account are invested and grow over time. The employee then receives the accumulated funds when they retire.

There are several laws that govern defined contribution plans, but the Pension Protection Act is the one that permits employers to automatically enroll employees. Automatic enrollment means that an employee is automatically enrolled in the plan unless they opt out. This is designed to increase participation in the plan and help employees save more for retirement.

The other laws listed in the question are also relevant to defined contribution plans, but they do not specifically address automatic enrollment. The Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provides certain rights to employees who lose their health benefits.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets standards for pension plans, including defined contribution plans. The Internal Revenue Code provides tax rules for retirement plans, including defined contribution plans.

To learn more about defined contribution plan here:

https://brainly.com/question/30066472#

#SPJ11

Each district court draws names at random from a list of registered voters and people with driver's licences who live in that district. The people chosen at random complete a questionnaire to help determine if they are qualified to serve as a jury.

To know more about selection of jury refer:

https://brainly.com/question/8002244

#SPJ4

Answer:

The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.

Explanation:

There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.

The correct answer to the question is d. Less-lethal weapons are not designed to k-i-l-l a suspect, as they are intended to be less harmful than conventional firearms.

Less-lethal weapons are designed to provide law enforcement officers with non-lethal options to deal with suspects who pose a threat, without resorting to deadly force. These weapons are designed to disable, capture or immobilize a suspect, while minimizing the risk of serious injury or death. Examples of less-lethal weapons include pepper spray, rubber bullets, stun guns, and bean bag rounds. The correct answer to the question is d. Less-lethal weapons are not designed to kill a suspect, as they are intended to be less harmful than conventional firearms. However, it is important to note that even less-lethal weapons can cause serious harm or even death if used improperly or excessively, so their use must be carefully controlled and monitored. Overall, less-lethal weapons can provide a valuable tool for law enforcement officers to use in difficult situations, helping to prevent unnecessary loss of life and injury.

To know more about Less-lethal weapons visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28259427

#SPJ11

The false statement among the limitations, prohibitions, and challenges listed is: "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government."

In reality, one of the primary reasons for classifying information is to protect national security, not to prevent embarrassment to the government. The classification system is designed to safeguard sensitive information that, if disclosed, could potentially harm the country's interests, compromise intelligence sources, or endanger individuals. Classifying information is governed by specific criteria and guidelines that prioritize national security concerns over potential embarrassment. The U.S. government has established clear procedures and standards for determining what information should be classified and the level of classification required.

In summary, the false statement is that "Information may not be classified to prevent embarrassment to the U.S. government." Classification of information primarily aims to protect national security rather than prevent government embarrassment.

To know more about national security, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2639721

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

b

Explanation:

ECON - A regulation influences wages by setting rules about employment and pay. Thus, option B is the correct option.

Thomas Malthus' population theory served as the foundation for the subsistence theory of wages, which was put out by David Ricardo and other classical economists. According to this theory, the market rate for labor would constantly converge on the subsistence level. If there were more workers available, salaries would ultimately decline and there would be less labor available.

If the pay increased above the subsistence level, the population would rise until the added competition from a bigger labor force drove wages back down. According to the wage-fund hypothesis, salaries were influenced by both the size of the labor force and the proportional quantities of capital available for paying employees. Only an increase in capital or a reduction in the number of workers causes wages to rise.

Learn more about wages here:

https://brainly.com/question/14895331

#SPJ7

Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.

The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) was legislated by Congress in 2000 to address situations about children's access to obscene or destructive content over the Internet.

The Children's Internet Protection Act, understood as "CIPA," needs libraries that participate in specific federal programs to install "technology protection measures" on all of their Internet access terminals, nevertheless of whether federal programs are produced for the terminals or Internet connections. Both of Congress's earlier endeavors at restricting indecent Internet content, the Communications Decency Act and the Child Online Protection Act, were maintained to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds.

Hence, Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.

To learn more about Children's Internet Protection Act refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14299588

#SPJ4

The schools are required to adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication according to Children's Internet Protection Act.

This act was enacted by Congress in 2000. This act looks at children's access to obscene content on the Internet.

It requires the school and other educational institutions to block the access of the children to obscene content on the internet.

Thus, Children's Internet Protection Act is the law of 2000, which makes the schools adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication.

To learn more, refer to: brainly.com/question/14299588

#SPJ4