Answers
Many senators who opposed United States membership in the League of Nations argued that joining the League would: involve the nation in future military conflicts.
Senate Republicans went against to the Association had contended persuasively that participation would forever snare the United States in Europe's quarrels and undermine the country's one-sided control of its own international strategy. The United States never joined the Class of Countries.
Wilson had battled exhaustingly for an alternate outcome. In the fall of 1919, Wilson traveled around the nation attempting to energize public help for the Class of Countries. The Association was the best expect future world harmony, Wilson kept up with, dismissing Republican "promulgation" as manipulating through scare tactics.
During World War II, numerous Americans lamented the country's decision to scorn the Association. The United States in this manner played a main job in making the United Countries, which officially supplanted the Class of Countries in 1946.
to know more about world war II click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1307729
#SPJ4
Related Questions
What clause requires that states treat people from other states equally to their own residents?
Answers
This clause is known as the "Privileges and Immunities Clause," and it ensures that people from one state are given the same rights and privileges as people from another state when they are traveling or visiting a different state.
This clause is important because it helps to ensure that there is equality and fairness between states and their people.
Arizona's top prosecutor concealed records debunking election fraud claims. what s the main?
Answers
Arizona's then-attorney general Mark Brnovich opened an inquiry into voting in the state's largest county nearly a year after the 2020 election considering records debunking election fraud claims.
According to internal documents examined by The Washington Post, investigators produced a report in March 2022 that stated that almost all allegations of error and wrongdoing were unfounded. Republican Brnovich kept it to himself. The attorney general released an "Interim Report" in April, claiming that his office had found "serious vulnerabilities" while running in the GOP primary for a U.S. Senate seat.
He omitted edits from his own investigators that disputed his claims. Then, in September, his office produced an "Election Review Summary" that comprehensively debunked claims of widespread fraud and made it clear that none of the complainants from state lawmakers to self-styled "election integrity" groups had offered any proof to back up their assertions.
Learn more about election at:
brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ4
type of advance medical directive does the AMA recommend? Living will or Durable power of attorney
I need a definitive answer to this question, please
Answers
Answer:
C) Durable power of attorney
Explanation:
A Power of Attorney is a legal document that appoints an “Agent” to represent you and handle specific issues for you. Depending upon the terms of the Power of Attorney, your Agent could be authorized to make financial and health care decisions on your behalf.
similarities and differences between the declaration of independence and the declaration of sentiments
Answers
Similarities and differences between the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Sentiments are as follows:
Similarities: Both the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Sentiments are designed to recognise the value of fundamental human rights for all people.
Differences: The Declaration of Independence is a political document whereas the Declaration of Sentiments is a social document.
Similarities: Both the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Sentiments are written to acknowledge the importance of inalienable human rights for all individuals. Both documents call for the individual right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The two documents recognize the right to dissolve political ties with an unjust government.
Both call for individuals to fight for their rights and to create a new form of government to support the common good.
Differences:The Declaration of Independence is a political document that focuses on American colonies’ break with Great Britain, whereas the Declaration of Sentiments is a social document that emphasizes the injustice of gender inequality.
The Declaration of Sentiments argues that women should be given the same rights as men, including the right to vote. The Declaration of Independence does not address gender issues.
The Declaration of Independence emphasizes the role of government in protecting individual rights, while the Declaration of Sentiments emphasizes the importance of social norms in defining women’s rights.
For more such questions on Declaration of Independence, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/10004019
#SPJ11
Which section of the New York State Real Property Law states that the broker may be liable for the salesperson's actions.
Answers
Section 442-C of the New York State Real Property Law states that
who could be held accountable for a salesperson's actions
A broker commits a misdemeanor if he employs a salesperson who does not have the necessary license to do so.
No violation of this article by a real estate salesman or employee of a real estate broker shall be deemed to be cause for the revocation or suspension of the broker's license, unless it appears that the broker had actual knowledge of such violation or retains the benefits, profits, or proceeds of a transaction wrongfully negotiated by his salesman or employee after notice of the salesman's or employee's misconduct.
Learn more about " NYS Real Property Law " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/14375848
#SPJ4
What type of source is a vindication of the rights of woman?.
Answers
According to Anne Mellor's essay, "Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and the Women Writers of Her Day," Vindication was founded on the notion that both men and women should have access to "universal human rights" and that women and men are equal in every manner that matters.
Who is Anne Mellor?
The University of California, Los Angeles employs American scholar Anne Kostelanetz Mellor as a Distinguished Professor of English Literature and Women's Studies. She was born on July 15, 1941[1]. She has expertise in gender studies, feminist theory, philosophy, art history, and Romantic literature. She is most known for a number of essays and books that rediscovered neglected female Romantic poets for literary history, and in 1988, she curated Romanticism and Feminism, the first collection of feminist writings on Romantic authors.
To know more about Anne Mellor check out:
https://brainly.com/question/24639190
#SPJ4
in a nontaxable exchange between unrelated parties, are the amount realized by the parties always equal?
Answers
In a nontaxable exchange between unrelated parties, the amount realized by the parties may not always be equal.
The amount realized by each party is the value of the property or asset received in the exchange.
However, in some cases, the value of the property received by one party may be different from the value of the property given up by that party. This could happen if the parties are exchanging assets with different values or if there are other considerations involved in the exchange, such as the assumption of liabilities or the receipt of cash or other assets in addition to the property being exchanged.
In any case, as long as the exchange meets the requirements for a nontaxable exchange, such as being for like-kind property and meeting certain timing and other conditions, the parties may be able to defer recognition of any gain or loss on the exchange until a future taxable event occurs.
Learn more about nontaxable here:
https://brainly.com/question/30397168
#SPJ11
n davis v. baugh industrial contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. in reviewing such a case, the washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how:
Answers
The Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. this is an example of how: (B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
4 Alan's daughter Tami Davis, who is also his estate's personal representative, brought this negligence claim against Baugh and other defendants. The completion and acceptance doctrine absolved Baugh of culpability for negligence once the work was finished and accepted by the property owner, according to the summary judgment that the trial court awarded Baugh. Additionally, the trial court partially invalidated an expert declaration for Davis. Davis contends that the trial court erred in his direct appeal from the superior court. We both agree and switch. NORMS OF REVIEW
To know more about Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/5000868
#SPJ4
Complete Questions:
In Davis v. Baugh Industrial Contractors, the traditional common law rule prevented a party who accepted a completed construction project from later suing the contractor for flaws in construction that caused injury to others. In reviewing such a case, the Washington state high court held that the rule was not sensible in modern times and would be dropped. This is an example of how:
(A) modern day values are changing
(B) common law can adapt to changing circumstances
(C) common law never changes
(D) courts can never go against a precedent set in previous cases
(E) none of the other choices
The 6th amendment of the US Constitution requires search warrants in civil and criminal proceedings for any cause of action.
True or False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the text book it saids it is the sets rights related to criminal
What is generally true regarding insured who have have been giving classified as preferred risks
Answers
Obama's executive order on the accessibility of private handguns relates
directly to this case *
O Marbury v. Madison
D. C. V. Heller
Plessy v. Ferguson
O U.S. vs. Nixon
Answers
Answer: It relates to the D.C. v. Heller case.
Explanation: This case has to do with the second amendment that allows an individual to bear arms.
the lowest age of criminal responsibility established by common law was at the age of years old.
Answers
In the United States, the minimum age for state crimes is 11 years old, whereas it is as low as 6 years in South Carolina and 7 years in 35 states.
Define Common Law.The corpus of law known as the common law was created by judges and other quasi-judicial organizations and is distinguished by being expressed in written opinions. The way common law is developed—through precedent—sets it apart from other legal systems. The legal principles of past cases are summed up by common law courts using former court decisions.
In formal adjudications, the American system mostly relies on court precedent because it is a "common law" system. Even when a statute is in dispute, our common law system requires that prior court decisions be taken into account when making decisions.
To know more about Common Law, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ1
Speeding is either a primary or secondary factor in most all vehicle accidents.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
Primary is true
Explanation:
Primary Traffic Offenses:
Most traffic violations are primary offenses. Common primary offenses include: speeding. disobeying a traffic signal (including red light violations).
1. From your prospective what could be a major internal problem/threat to the US? What incentives are creating this threat? Do you think their could or should be a way to change the incentives?
2. From your prospective what could be a major external threat that could cause problems in the US? What incentives are creating this threat? Do you think their could or should be a way to change the incentives?
Answers
Externally, geopolitical conflicts and tensions with other world powers such as China and Russia could pose a significant threat to the United States. The incentives driving this threat include competition for resources, influence and geopolitical dominance.
Changing incentives will require diplomatic efforts, dialogue and cooperation to build mutual trust and find common ground on global issues.
Whereas Internally, the polarization and fragmentation of society can pose a grave threat to the United States. The stimuli that fuel this threat include politics, economic inequality, and identity.
Changing incentives would mean focusing on shared values to foster dialogue, empathy, bridge divides and foster a sense of national unity and social cohesion.
To learn more about threats faced by U.S:
https://brainly.com/question/22059453
#SPJ4
Which of the following would likely be considered only an infraction?
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
B. A violent crime under the aggravating circumstances of having
been provoked
C. An act of arson that led to the destruction of property, but not to
the physical harm of any person
D. A first act of shoplifting merchandise with a value of a few
hundred dollars
Answers
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Choices B-D are either criminal charges, or a misdemeanor. Someone with no previous record is likely to receive a warning (not even a citation/infraction).
Answer:
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
Tort is a French word meaning ______. Wrong.
Answers
Tort, which derives from the Anglo-French language, is defined as "wrong" or "a unlawful conduct." A tort is a civil wrong or injury that happens when one party violates a duty owed to another party, leading to harm or damage, according to legal definitions.
What is Anglo-French language?Old French and Old English were blended to create Anglo-French, which was used by the aristocracy in England from the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 until the late 14th century. This language, which was also known as "Anglo-Norman French," was used for administration, law, and literature. It had a big impact on how the English language evolved. An original Middle English dialect that included Old French, Old Norse, and Old English finally emerged as a result of the Anglo-French language's long-term evolution and alteration. The many French loanwords and idioms in contemporary English are evidence of the Anglo-French heritage.
To learn more about Anglo-French visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/21601112
#SPJ4
Juanita, a Texas resident (5th Circuit), is researching a tax question and finds a 5th Circuit case ruling that is favorable and a 9th Circuit case that is unfavorable. Which circuit case has more "authoritative weight" and why? How would your answer change if Juanita were a Kentucky resident (6th Circuit)?
Answers
To summarise, the circuit case that holds more authoritative weight for an individual is typically the one from their own circuit, as the rulings from that circuit are binding within it.
When determining which circuit case has more "authoritative weight," we need to consider the hierarchy of the federal court system. The circuits are organised into different regions, and each circuit has its own Court of Appeals.
In general, a case from the circuit in which a person resides holds more authority than a case from another circuit. This is because the ruling from the person's own circuit is binding within that circuit. So, if Juanita is a Texas resident (5th Circuit), the 5th Circuit case ruling would have more authoritative weight for her.
However, if Juanita were a Kentucky resident (6th Circuit), then the 6th Circuit case ruling would have more authoritative weight for her. The same principle applies here, where the ruling from the person's own circuit is binding within that circuit.
To know more about circuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12608516
#SPJ11
1. Explain the difference between Ethics and Moraity.
Answers
Answer:
Both morality and ethics loosely have to do with distinguishing the difference between “good and bad” or “right and wrong.” Many people think of morality as something that's personal and normative, whereas ethics is the standards of “good and bad” distinguished by a certain community or social setting.
Answer:
Both morality and ethics loosely have to do with distinguishing the difference between “good and bad” or “right and wrong.” Many people think of morality as something that's personal and normative, whereas ethics is the standards of “good and bad” distinguished by a certain community or social setting.
Explanation:
plz mark me as brainlist
ALAP
What is law really
Answers
voter participation in statewide constitutional amendment elections is most likely to see big increases under what circumstances?
Answers
Explanation:
Voter participation in statewide constitutional amendment elections is most likely to see big increases under the following circumstances:
High public interest and engagement in the amendment being proposed: When people are passionate about the issue at hand, they are more likely to go out and vote.
Effective and targeted outreach and mobilization efforts: Campaigns and organizations working to increase voter participation can have a significant impact by reaching out to groups that typically have lower voter turnout and encouraging them to participate.
Convenient and accessible voting options: Making voting more convenient and accessible, such as through early voting or online voting, can also increase voter participation.
Controversial or divisive amendments: Constitutional amendments that are controversial or generate significant public debate are more likely to drive people to the polls to have their say.
Competitive elections: Elections that are closely contested and have high stakes tend to drive up voter turnout, as people are more motivated to participate when they feel their vote will make a difference.
You should now be familiar with two Supreme Court cases related to the Eighth Amendment and juvenile law. Now you will use what you've learned to write an extended response to the focus question. Imagine your state is having voters decide the issue of whether to allow juveniles to be tried and sentenced as adults. The local newspaper has asked students in your course to submit an article on the topic to give minors a voice in the debate. The editor explains that your audience includes voting adults who may be undecided on the issue. Your job is to write a persuasive article to convince them to your side.
Your article will be graded on content and quality. Be sure to use facts and quotes where appropriate to explain or justify your claim. Relate court cases that you have learned about to each other and refer to what you have learned in lessons. You may use this template to organize your article. Should the courts treat minors the same as adults when they are accused of serious crimes?
Answers
this is not a question sir
in this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge.
Answers
In the reduced sentence plea, the defendant basically pleads guilty or nolo contendere to get a included charge.
The correct option is option b.
The purpose of reduced sentences is to get the offenders plead guilty of their crimes as early as possible because when they do this, it particularly saves victims as well as the witnesses from the stress of basically going through a trial, such as having to relive their ordeal as well as being repeatedly cross examined about it.
This is very important when there are young and the vulnerable victims which should not be put through further traumatic experiences. It also reduced the number of cases which are going in a trial and thus helps in improving the efficiency of the criminal justice system.
Hence, the correct option is b.
To know more about reduced sentences
https://brainly.com/question/17238327
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
"In this type of plea, a defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a lesser included charge. a. Vertical plea. b. Reduced-sentence plea c. Horizontal plea. d. Avoidance-of-stigma plea."
Which of the following items is NOT matched correctly?
• murder: the deliberate intentional killing of another human being
• voluntary manslaughter: the killing of another human being in performance of a public duty
• involuntary manslaughter: the unintentional killing of another human being as a result of criminal carelessness
• noncriminal homicide: the killing of another human being involving self-defense
Answers
voluntary manslaughter: the killing of another human being in performance of a public duty is NOT matched correctly.
The intentional killing of another person is referred to as voluntary manslaughter but it is unrelated to the discharge of a public duty. Instead, voluntary manslaughter typically involves the deliberate killing of another person under conditions that lessen the severity of the offense like acting out of passion or in response to a sufficient amount of provocation.
Contrarily, justifiable homicide which includes circumstances where the use of force is deemed necessary and legal, such as self defense or the defense of others is a better term to describe the killing of another person while carrying out a public duty.
Learn more about voluntary manslaughter at:
brainly.com/question/32729040
#SPJ4
Which of the following can be defined as errors of fact which are
considered so incorrect they are determined an error by law?
a. Jurisdiction error
b. Precedence error
c. Prejudicial error
d. Legislative error
Answers
Answer: C. prejudicial error
Explanation:
Prejudicial errors are factual errors that are considered so incorrect that they can have a significant impact on the outcome of a legal case. Therefore, option C is correct.
What are Prejudicial errors?Prejudicial errors are factual errors that can have a significant impact on the outcome of a legal case. These errors are considered so incorrect that they are determined by law to be grounds for appeal or reversal of a verdict.
Prejudicial errors can occur in various forms, such as the misidentification of a defendant or witness, incorrect presentation of evidence, or incorrect application of the law.
In some cases, prejudicial errors can be intentional, such as when a prosecutor withholds exculpatory evidence or presents false testimony.
Prejudicial errors can undermine the integrity of the legal system by leading to wrongful convictions or acquittals, and therefore, it is important for the court to identify and correct these errors to ensure a fair and just outcome.
Learn more about exculpatory evidence here:
brainly.com/question/9736519
#SPJ2
which type of breaching relies on brute force created by tactical team members
Answers
Use the minimum amount of force to achieve positive entry to an objective
what are the consequences to a silent partner in a partnership when the partnership is unable to pay off debt
Answers
Answer:
When a partnership can not pay of it's debt, they can get sued by the person they owe the debt to.
Bruneis Role of Foreign Powers in Asymmetric Warfare
(cite sources)
Answers
Brunei, being a small and peaceful country, has not had a significant role in asymmetric warfare. However, its strategic location in Southeast Asia and its cooperation with foreign powers have made it a potential target for terrorist organizations.
To counter this threat, Brunei has relied on its relationships with foreign powers to enhance its security capabilities and protect its borders.
Brunei's security policy is based on maintaining good relations with its neighbors and fostering cooperation with foreign powers. Its military forces are small and primarily focused on internal security, but it has developed a capable maritime surveillance and interdiction capability to protect its borders from terrorist infiltration. Brunei has also signed a number of defense agreements and memorandums of understanding with foreign powers, including the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Singapore, to enhance its defense capabilities and improve its interoperability with regional partners.
1. Intelligence sharing: Brunei collaborates with foreign intelligence agencies to gather and analyze information about potential threats and terror organizations. This collaboration allows the country to better understand and address asymmetric threats.
2. Training and capacity building: Foreign powers may offer training programs and resources to help Brunei build its military capabilities. This support includes training its forces in special operations and counter-terrorism tactics to be more effective against unconventional threats.
3. Military support: Brunei may receive direct military support from foreign powers, such as equipment, personnel, and logistical assistance, to address asymmetric threats more efficiently.
To Know more about foreign powers
https://brainly.com/question/9843480
#SPJ11
how a federal bill becomes a law. These cartoons are out of order. Number the cartoon panels from 1 to 12 in the correct order of how a bill passes through Congress. The last step of how a bill becomes a law is number for you. HELP URGENT I NEED THE ANSWER NOW I WILL GIVE MAX AMOUT OF POINT ‼️‼️‼️‼️
Answers
Answer:
please your questions cannot be viewed
You are the prosecutor on a domestic violence-related murder. A husband brutally stabbed his wife more than 20 times. The first responding officer placed the husband into custody after arriving on the crime scene. The officer questioned the man about what happened. The man confesses to the officer at the scene that he had killed his wife because she had caught him cheating, and she was going to divorce him.
During your pre-trial preparation, you have a meeting with the officer. He tells you that he did not advise the husband of his Miranda Rights after taking him into custody, but before asking him questions. As an experienced prosecutor, you know that this might be an issue during the trial. You know of some legal loopholes that might allow you to get the confession entered into evidence, but only if the officer tells the truth that he did not read the Miranda Rights. During the trial, the defense attorney cross-examines the officer and asks, "Officer, did you read my client the Miranda Warnings before you interrogated him?"
There is NO video or other evidence to support or contradict whether the officer read the Miranda Warnings or not. The officer testifies that yes, he did read the Miranda Warnings. You know that the officer is lying on the witness stand. If you say something, you know that the confession will be thrown out, and the entire case will be tainted. You know that most likely that the defendant will be found not guilty and set free. If you say nothing, then the man will be convicted and sent to prison for the brutal murder. Ethically, what should you do?
Answers
As an experienced prosecutor, it is important to follow ethical rules. Ethically, it would be appropriate to inform the court of the officer's lie regarding the reading of the Miranda Warnings.
Here are some reasons to support this ethical decision:
If the officer lied, it would indicate that the confession was not voluntary because the defendant was not warned about his right to remain silent.The court would be more likely to dismiss the case if it became aware that an officer had lied under oath about Miranda Warnings.
In court, the prosecutor's primary duty is to seek justice, not to obtain convictions at all costs.There is no ethical dilemma since there is only one correct answer. The prosecutor must disclose the officer's testimony and allow the court to determine the credibility of the officer's testimony regarding Miranda Warnings.
To know more about ethical visit
https://brainly.com/question/30090411
#SPJ11
True/False. most states have both civil and criminal penalties for failing to report child abuse.
Answers
True. Most states have both civil and criminal penalties for failing to report child a-b-u-s-e.
The exact penalties may vary depending on the state, but generally, individuals who fail to report suspected child a-b-u-s-e can face fines, imprisonment, or both. In some states, individuals may also face civil liability for damages resulting from their failure to report. It is important to note that the exact requirements for reporting suspected child abuse also vary by state, so it is important to be familiar with the laws in your state and to report any suspicions of abuse promptly to the appropriate authorities. Failing to do so can not only result in legal consequences but can also put the safety and well-being of a child at risk.
To know more about criminal penalties visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30792515
#SPJ11