place the following statements in order to correctly describe how policy is formed after a problem has been identified. rank the options below. develop proposalsopen choices for ranking no answer enact lawopen choices for ranking no answer evaluate resultsopen choices for ranking no answer build supportopen choices for ranking no answer implement policy

Option (d), Included in government income transfers are all of the wages paid to police officers in the list below.

Municipal, state, and federal government activities to redistribute money to those in need are known as transfer payments. Social Security and unemployment insurance are two examples of transfer payments that are frequently made in the US. Transfer payments are a rare way to refer to corporate subsidies and bailouts.

GDP includes investment, consumption, and net exports. While government transfers like Social Security payments are, government spending is not. Transfers from the government to the public also include benefits like Social Security. Due to the fact that transfers do not represent output, they are not accounted for in GDP.

Learn more about government income transfers: https://brainly.com/question/13998612

#SPJ1

Answer:

4,5,6

Explanation i got it right

Answer:

4 5 6 is correct

Explanation:

The correct option is option (c), i.e., The state has substantial interests in protecting the privacy of accident victims and in regulating the practice of medical care providers, and the law is narrowly tailored to achieve the state's objectives.

Why is confidentiality important to victims?

When the anonymity of their information is guaranteed, victims of violence are more likely to seek out help and reveal the true nature of the abuse or attack they have endured. This enables efficient, individualized advocacy planning and responses.

Why is it important for the government to make laws protecting the victims as well as the witnesses of a crime?

For successful criminal trials to take place and for organized criminal groups to be destroyed, victims' and witnesses' cooperation is essential. However, getting such cooperation is one of the difficulties that many criminal justice systems encounter in the investigation and prosecution of crime.

Learn more about Right to privacy: https://brainly.com/question/2033492

#SPJ4

The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was a significant piece of legislation that attempted to eliminate many of the Jim Crow laws that were in place at the time.

The act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses S.Grant in an effort to provide equal rights and protections to all citizens, regardless of race. The act prohibited discrimination in public places, including hotels, restaurants, and transportation.

However, the act was largely ineffective in its enforcement, and many of its provisions were eventually struck down by the Supreme Court in 1883. Despite its shortcomings, the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was an important step towards the eventual elimination of Jim Crow laws and the protection of civil rights for all citizens.

For more question on civil rights

https://brainly.com/question/30092721

#SPJ11

In a civil case, the object is to obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party.  

Civil cases involve those conflicts cases between people or businesses.

These court cases deal with finances or damage to individual rights.

A civil case begins when an individual or business reasons to have been hurt by another person or company.

The civil cases are between the plaintiff and the defendant.

Thus option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about "the Civil Case" here:

brainly.com/question/1065754

The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.

The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.

To know more about genocide visit:

brainly.com/question/32013150

#SPJ11

I believe the interview of  Richard Clarke  was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.

Yes he does because he stated that due to the reason of  the White House not nominating the  senior managers to replace those who were said to have left. the homeland security is said to be leaderless.

If I had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same,  i will chose to keep it the same as it is the right thing to do, splitting will lead to more cost. The best thing is keeping it the same and appointment of leadership head.

Therefore, I believe the interview of  Richard Clarke  was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.

Learn more about Homeland Security from

https://brainly.com/question/850432

#SPJ1

D) All of the above

The first amendment enables everyone to practice or not practice religion, without an form of government intervention involved. Religiose beliefs are further protected under the Equality Act and several other laws. "Separation between Church and State," was built upon later in the 14th amendment as well.

I hope this helps! :)

Because of the high volume of interstate highway traffic, special care must be taken when changing lanes or pulling over on or along the side of the road. This is especially true when considering the high speeds at which many drivers are traveling.

Drivers should only execute lane changes or pull overs to avoid hazards ahead and with adequate warning to other drivers. Failure to do so could result in serious accidents or fatalities. It is important for all drivers to remain alert and vigilant while on the road, and to always prioritize safety over convenience.

To read more about speeds click here

https://brainly.com/question/15837674

#SPJ11

Answer:

majority opinion by Henry B. Brown. The Court held that the state law was constitutional. In an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation.

Answer: Yes, a court would likely hold that Davidson Masonry was also liable on the contract that had been entered by Carl Davidson.

Explanation:

Yes, I believe that Davidson Masonry would also be bound by the contact that has been entered into by Lafayette. Carl Davidson did so for the purpose and goal of the project that they were all working on in their joint venture.

Even though Carl Davidson entered into this separate agreement without the knowledge of Davidson Masonry’s, Carl still did so while in the joint venture with them and also for the purposes of the joint venture project. Therefore, Davidson Masonry would likely be bounded by a court to this contract.

Answer:

It's a violation of the 14th Amendment, with equal rights under the law. So, profiling shouldn't make a difference. The negative effect is the overlooking of other races.

If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.

The Bureau of Economics  can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.

Based on the scenario  the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.

Therefore the correct option is A.

Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?

the Bureau of Economics

the Bureau of Competition

the Bureau of Consumer Protection

the Bureau of Housing and Development

Answer:

Explanation:

In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?

the profession of the victim

the profession of the criminal

the type of crime committed

the area the crime was committed in

The legal powers Congress cedes to the Presidency in the ordinary course of events are known as "delegated powers."

Delegated powers refer to the authority that Congress grants to the President to execute and administer various tasks and functions.

In the U.S. Constitution, the separation of powers is an essential principle that divides the responsibilities of the federal government among three branches: the legislative branch (Congress), the executive branch (the President), and the judicial branch (the Supreme Court). This separation ensures that no single branch gains excessive power.

However, the branches also need to work together for the government to function effectively. Congress, as the legislative branch, is responsible for creating and passing laws. But the President, as the head of the executive branch, is responsible for enforcing and executing these laws. In some cases, Congress may delegate some of its authority to the President so they can address certain situations more efficiently.

Delegated powers often come in the form of legislation where Congress outlines the general goals or objectives and grants the President the authority to create rules, regulations, and policies to achieve those goals. This delegation of authority allows the President and the executive branch to react more quickly and efficiently to emerging issues and policy challenges.

It is important to note that delegated powers are not unlimited. The Constitution sets boundaries on the extent to which Congress can delegate its powers to the President. Additionally, the courts have played a role in determining the constitutionality of delegated powers, ensuring that the balance of power among the branches remains in check.

In conclusion, delegated powers are authorities granted by Congress to the President in the ordinary course of events, allowing the executive branch to carry out and enforce laws more effectively. This practice helps maintain a balance of power and collaboration between the legislative and executive branches of the U.S. government.

To know more about Delegated Powers.

https://brainly.com/question/624825

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

the answer is F: C&D only

Answer:

k

Explanation:

Explanation:

sorry I can't. I'm broke

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it is B ....

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It makes sense

~Plz tap the crown~

~Thank you~

Answer:

A member of a jury in court

Explanation:

The given statement "under title vii of the civil rights act, most private firms are required to implement affirmative action policies." is false as most private firms are not required to implement affirmative action policies.

Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, but it does not require affirmative action.

Affirmative action refers to policies or programs that give preferential treatment to individuals from underrepresented groups in an effort to promote diversity and overcome past discrimination. While affirmative action programs may be implemented voluntarily by private firms, they are not required by law under Title VII.

However, federal contractors and subcontractors are required to implement affirmative action policies under Executive Order 11246, which was signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965. This order requires contractors and subcontractors who do business with the federal government to take affirmative action to ensure that their employment practices are free from discrimination and promote diversity.

Learn more about civil rights act at:

brainly.com/question/12447824

#SPJ4

Answer:

the law making process in congress is designed to make passing laws more difficult due to the checks and balances within system where the bill is checked by house, senate, and goes through a committee system, and president before it can become legislation. That, in my opinion would be the hardest way.

Passing a bill is hard at every level almost, but the hardest part in my opinion is when it has to pass the House of Representatives. Due to the big political differences in the House of Representatives, since there is almost a perfect divide out of 435 representatives then you need 218 votes to move it on. With half of the representatives being republican and the other being democratic, just getting them to agree is impossible most of the time.

Answer:

i think its c.................

Commercial AE are considered military munitions When it is created by or utilised by the military for national security and defence.

What are the definitions of military munitions?

Military munitions include all ammunition products or components under the jurisdiction of the Departments of Defence, the Coast Guard, the Department of Energy, and the National Guard as well as any ammunition produced for or used by the armed forces for purposes of national defence and security. Early cannonballs and "shells," which were comparable weapons intended to be fired from artillery instead of solid cannonballs, were hollow cast-iron balls packed with gunpowder. The term "shell," which derives from the casing, came to be used as a metaphor for the entire munition.

Know more about munitions- brainly.com/question/28342738

#SPJ1

In the common law tradition, judges have much more discretion to interpret the law. Option C

In the common law tradition, judges play a central role in developing and interpreting the law, and have significant discretion in how they apply legal principles to specific cases. This is in contrast to the civil law tradition, in which judges are generally expected to follow the letter of the law as written by the legislative body, and have less discretion to interpret or apply the law in new or unexpected ways.

Judges in the common law tradition are also heavily reliant on precedent, or past legal decisions, to guide their decisions, and are often seen as playing a more passive role in trials than judges in the civil law tradition. While judges in both legal traditions are expected to be impartial and objective, their roles and responsibilities within the legal system can vary significantly depending on the tradition in which they operate.

Learn more about  common law at https://brainly.com/question/30191929

#SPJ1

Answer:

He is at an increased risk of diabetes

Explanation:

(Although in real life a normal sized bag of candy will not impact you significantly I believe this is what the question wants).

Answer:

Based on the given facts, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.

Explanation:

The agreement between the developer and the investor to sell the land was a contract, which was formed when the developer made an offer to purchase the land and the investor accepted it. The fact that the parties did not use attorneys or put the agreement in writing does not necessarily make the agreement unenforceable. However, the agreement does not comply with the Statute of Frauds, which requires certain contracts, including contracts for the sale of land, to be in writing in order to be enforceable.

The payment of $2,500 by the developer to the investor constitutes earnest money, which is a deposit made by a buyer to show good faith and to bind the contract. If the developer breaches the contract, the investor is entitled to keep the earnest money as liquidated damages. However, the investor cannot force the developer to purchase the land or to perform the contract because specific performance is an equitable remedy, and the court will not compel the developer to perform the contract when the contract is unenforceable due to the Statute of Frauds.

Therefore, the correct answer is (B) No, but the court will allow the investor to keep the $2,500 earnest money as damages.