Read the passage below, written by Dr. James McCune Smith, an American abolitionist. How does the author relate the Haitian Revolution to the American abolitionist movement? But his thoughts were bent on conquest of another kind; he was determined to overthrow an error which designing and interested men had craftily instilled into the civilized world, - a belief in the natural inferiority of the Negro race. It was the glory and the warrantable boast of Toussaint that he had been the instrument of demonstrating that, even with the worst odds against them, this race is entirely capable of achieving liberty and of self-government. He did more: by abolishing caste he proved the artificial nature of such distinctions, and further demonstrated that even slavery cannot unfit men for the full exercise of all the functions which belong to free citizens. 1
Answers
Dr. James McCune Smith relates the Haitian Revolution to the American abolitionist movement by highlighting the significance of Toussaint's accomplishments in challenging the belief in the natural inferiority of the Negro race.
In the passage, Dr. James McCune Smith relates the Haitian Revolution to the American abolitionist movement by highlighting its significance in challenging the belief in the natural inferiority of the Black race and proving their capability for liberty and self-government.
Dr. McCune Smith emphasizes that the Haitian Revolution, led by Toussaint Louverture, served as a powerful demonstration that the Black race, despite facing tremendous odds, was fully capable of achieving freedom and governing themselves.By overthrowing the oppressive system of slavery and abolishing caste distinctions, Toussaint showcased the artificial nature of racial hierarchies and the inherent capacity of enslaved individuals for the exercise of their rights as free citizens.By drawing parallels between the Haitian Revolution and the American abolitionist movement, Dr. McCune Smith argues that the achievements of Toussaint and the Haitian people directly challenged the prevalent notion of Black inferiority propagated by those with vested interests in maintaining slavery.It provided inspiration and a compelling example for abolitionists in America, reinforcing the belief that all individuals, regardless of race or status, were entitled to liberty and self-determination.
For more questions on Haitian Revolution
https://brainly.com/question/796082
#SPJ8
Related Questions
Compare the rationale of the Reagan administration for the 1981 tax reductions with the rationale behind the Kennedy-Johnson tax cut of 1964, the Bush tax cut of 2001, and the Bush tax cut of 2003.
Answers
Answer:
The rationale behind the Reagan administration's tax reductions in 1981 was to stimulate economic growth and investment by reducing tax rates and increasing incentives for business investment. The administration argued that lower tax rates would encourage individuals and businesses to save and invest more, which would lead to increased economic growth and job creation.
Similarly, the Kennedy-Johnson tax cut of 1964 aimed to stimulate economic growth by reducing tax rates and increasing consumer spending. The rationale behind this tax cut was that by putting more money in consumers' pockets, they would spend more, which would boost economic growth and create jobs.
The Bush tax cut of 2001 was also aimed at stimulating economic growth, but with a focus on supply-side economics. The rationale behind this tax cut was that by reducing tax rates on individuals and businesses, it would provide an incentive for businesses to invest more, create jobs, and drive economic growth.
The Bush tax cut of 2003 was also focused on supply-side economics, but with a specific emphasis on reducing taxes on investment income and capital gains. The rationale behind this tax cut was to encourage investment and entrepreneurship by providing a favorable tax environment for investors and entrepreneurs.
Overall, the rationales behind these tax cuts were generally focused on stimulating economic growth and investment by reducing tax rates and increasing incentives for businesses and individuals to save, invest, and spend more. However, the specific details and emphasis of each tax cut varied depending on the economic conditions and policy priorities of the time.
After world war 1, the U.S. entered a phase of
Answers
What was the result of the Treaty of Fort Laramie?
Answers
Discussion Topic What was significant about the Election of 1800? What is the Electoral College, and why was it implemented? Do you think the United States needs the electoral college today? Why or why not? Explain your answer in detail using specific examples.
Answers
The significance of the 1800 election was that it was viewed as an electoral revolution.
The Electoral college is a group of electors from all the states of the country including Washington whose duty is to elect the US president and the Vice president.
In my opinion, The united states does not need the electoral college and elections can be decided based on popular votes.
The united states does not need the electoral collage because the electors sometimes thwart the choice of the people as seen in the elections of 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016.
What is the Electoral college?In the United States, the Electoral college is a body of people who have been selected based on the population of the states in order to caste votes in an election.
The united states electoral college is made up of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. Each state State has the same number of electors as it does Members in its Congressional delegation. this implies that there are one for each Member in the House of Representatives plus two Senators.
The electoral college is not captured under the united states constitution and as such I would recommend a reform that seeks to expunge the idea of these electors so that voting can be done directly for candidates.
Learn kore about the Electoral College at brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1
Why do racial- and ethnic-based human rights abuses take place, and why might other nations be slow or quick to try to stop them?
Answers
Racial and ethnic-based human rights abuses occur due to factors such as prejudice, discrimination, and historical conflicts, while the response of other nations depends on political interests, diplomatic relations, and resources. National and international efforts to address these abuses vary based on priorities and strategic interests.
Racial and ethnic-based human rights abuses stem from deep-rooted prejudices and discriminatory beliefs that often result in marginalized communities being subjected to violence, exploitation, and social exclusion. These abuses can be perpetrated by individuals, communities, or even governments, often driven by a desire for power, control, or the assertion of cultural or racial superiority. Historical conflicts and unresolved tensions between different racial and ethnic groups can also contribute to the occurrence of such abuses.
The response of other nations to these human rights abuses can be influenced by various factors. Some nations may be quick to intervene, driven by a genuine concern for human rights or a desire to protect their own citizens or diaspora communities. However, others may be slower to respond or even choose not to intervene at all, due to factors such as political interests, diplomatic relations, or economic ties with the offending nation. Additionally, the availability of resources and the potential risks associated with intervention can impact the decision-making process of nations when addressing human rights abuses.
In conclusion, racial and ethnic-based human rights abuses take place due to a complex interplay of factors such as prejudice, discrimination, and historical conflicts, while the response of other nations is shaped by political interests, diplomatic relations, and resources.
Know more about human rights abuse here:
https://brainly.com/question/1059829
#SPJ11
HELP!!!! Which identifies points of the agreement between the Soviet Union and the other Allied powers at the Yalta Conference? Select all that apply. O-the immediate execution of the highest-ranking Nazi officials O-the establishment of a communist regime over Germany O-the demilitarization and denazification of Germany O-the division of Germany into four Allied occupation zones
Answers
Answer:
Correct Answer:
The points which identifies agreement between the Soviet Union and other Allied powers at the Yalta Conference include:
O-the demilitarization and denazification of Germany
O-the division of Germany into four Allied occupation zones
Explanation:
Yalta conference which was held between 4-11 February 1945, was the World War II meeting of the different heads of government of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union to discuss the postwar reorganization of Germany and Europe.
The meeting was intended mainly to discuss the re-establishment of the nations of war-torn Europe. During the conference, each of the three big countries has their agenda for the conference upon which was debated and ratified.
What were the Targets of the nuclear bombs?
Answers
Answer:
Very few areas met all the qualifications
Explanation:
-Kyoto
-Hiroshima
-Kokura
-Niigata.
these cities had become the finalists, with Kyoto and Hiroshima being the two primary targets.
How did the expulsion of Muslim and Jewish people affect Spain?
choose three correct answers.
Spain lost territory and influence because of the loss of population.
Spanish culture became unified around the Spanish language.
The protestant population of Spain grew.
Spain lost much of its merchants class.
Spain became a catholic empire.
Answers
Answer:
B. Spanish culture became unified around the Spanish language.
D. Spain lost much of its merchant class.
E. Spain became a Catholic empire.
Explanation:
edge
The expulsion of Muslim and Jewish people affect Spain and the culture of Spain became unified around the Spanish language, Spain lost much of its merchant class, and Spain became a Catholic empire.
What was the impact of the expulsion of Muslims and Jews in Spain?As a result of the deportation, thousands of Jews fled to Italy, Greece, and the Mediterranean Basin.
This can be seen in the emergence of Jewish surnames in Italy and Greece during the period.
Spain's culture was consolidated around the Spanish language as a result of the expulsion of Muslims and Jews, and Spain lost most of its mercantile class, becoming a Catholic empire.
Therefore, option B, D and E are correct.
Learn more about the Spain, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/23580884
#SPJ2
how did the beginning of pottery making signal a shift in ancient pueblo culture?
(no links please)
Answers
rock structures
Ancestral Puebloan ruins at Hovenweep, Utah.
People have lived in Utah for thousands of years. For 5/6 of that time, they have lived a hunting and gathering life.
However, around 2,500 years ago, the hunting and gathering life of the earliest people began to slowly change--and in big ways.
People began to grow food. The people we now call Ancestral Pueblo or Anasazi began to farm in the dry, warm climate of the Four Corners area. They figured out how to irrigate their crops.
Corn, beans, and squash (which probably came into Utah from Mexico) became a mainstay of meals. So did turkey, which the people had domesticated.
Settling down to farm was a big change, and it had a lot of consequences.
1. Do you think Amendments 13 14 and 15 ended
racism? Explain your reasoning.
Answers
While Amendments 13, 14, and 15 aimed to address racism, they did not completely end it, as systemic racism and discrimination persist in various forms.
What is racism?Racism is the notion that distinct groups of individuals have different behavioral qualities that correlate to hereditary characteristics and that they may be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.
It is also defined as a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, typically involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a specific racial group is inferior to the others.
Learn more about racism at:
https://brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
England's defeat of the Spanish Armada
A. led to a Franco-Spanish alliance that prevented England from establishing its own American colonies.
B. allowed England to take control of Spain's American colonies.
C. demonstrated that Spanish Catholicism was inferior to English Protestantism.
D. helped to ensure England's naval dominance in the North Atlantic.
E. occurred despite weather conditions which favored Spain.
Answers
The defeat of the Spanish Armada demonstrated England's naval dominance in the North Atlantic. For that reason, the correct option is D.
Although the weather conditions were unfavorable for Spain, the English navy's strategic maneuvers and superior tactics played a crucial role in the outcome.
The victory was not a direct reflection of religious superiority, but rather an indication of England's maritime strength and adaptability in battle. Finally, it was not a religious conflict, but rather a political and military one.
In other words, it demonstrated England's growing power and influence in Europe and marked the decline of Spanish dominance in the region.
Learn more about England: https://brainly.com/question/452616
#SPJ11
What was the first southern state to be readmitted to the union?.
Answers
Answer: Tennessee
Explanation: On July 24, 1866, Tennessee was the first southern state to be readmitted to the Union.
Based on this chart, which of these statements is MOST LIKELY true?
A) Spanish settlement of Latin America resulted in a high percentage of Roman Catholics.
B) Immigrants from other countries created a religious melting pot in Latin America.
C) Most people in Latin America do not adhere to a particular religion.
D) Bolivia does not allow the practice of unofficial religions.
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the percentage of roman catholics is the highest in the chart out of all the percentages so therefore latin america resulted in more roman catholics
Giuseppe Mazzini argued that people who share a language, culture, and history have a common destiny to live in freedom of a monarchy.
A) True
B) False
Answers
Answer:
The answer is False
Explanation:
Giuseppe Mazzini argued that people who share a language,
culture, and history have a common destiny to live in freedom
as a single nation
Find the correct answer by referring to the Introduction to the Russian Revolution.
What was wrong with capitalism during the late 1800s?
A. The workers suffered from the long hours
B. Common people were getting greedy and always wanted more
C. People were getting lazy and wanted more, but weren’t willing to work for it
D. The politicians didn’t get paid enough
E. The people weren’t compliant with what was demanded of them
Answers
Answer:
A. The workers suffered from long hours
Explanation:
The Russian Revolution of 1917 which was carried out against the government of Tsar Nicholas II and its capitalist mode of governance, was based on the premise that the peasants and working-class people are getting little pay for their work done, and it the employers that are gaining the most.
This is evident in the fact that the class of people that joined Vladimir Lenin's revolutionary movement were mostly the peasants and working-class categories.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "The workers suffered from the long hours."
Why might some people consider Samuel slaughter as a criminal?
Answers
Samuel forewarns his people that if they seek a king, they must expect taxation, requisitioning of their property, and conscription. It outlines the penalties; adultery and murder are not disregarded.
What kind of person was Samuel in the Bible?Samuel, an influential figure in Israeli religious history, lived in the 11th century bc. He is shown in the Old Testament in every leadership position available to a Jewish male of the time, including seer, priest, judge, prophet, and military commander.
The supreme essence of god and god's favour on the Israelites are the book of Samuel's central themes.
Therefore, Samuel forewarns his people that if they seek a king, they must expect taxation, requisitioning of their property, and conscription. It outlines the penalties; adultery and murder are not disregarded.
To know more about the Samuel, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9495258
#SPJ1
the musical as a genre flourished most prominently in the twentieth century in
Answers
how much of a priority do you think the French and Indian War was to Britain before William Pitt became head of the British government?
Answers
does this help? The French and Indian War pitted the colonies of British America against those of New France, each side supported by military units from the parent country and by Native American allies. At the start of the war, the French colonies had a population of roughly 60,000 settlers, compared with 2 million in the British colonies
Explain the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan in the 1990s & why the regime became an enemy of the United States.
I, for the life of me, can't find anything on this. Either I'm blind or just not looking in the right spot.
Answers
Answer: .
Explanation:
The Taliban entered Kandahar in November 1994 to pacify the crime-ridden southern city, and by September 1996 seized the capital, Kabul, from President Burhanuddin Rabbani, an ethnic Tajik whom they viewed as anti-Pashtun and corrupt.
What tool did Paleolithic people first use to hunt animals?
A.
axes
B.
clubs
C.
spears
D.
traps
Answers
Answer:
c
Explanation:
because they had only wood so they took a knife and shaved the tip of the stick to make it points and they stabbed animals and threw the spear. at the animals
Where did
armed forces
land in North
Africa? What
was the result of
Operation Torch?
Answers
Operation Torch, first major Allied amphibious assault during World War II. It involved about 65,000 troops who landed at Casablanca, Algiers, and Oran on the French North African coast. Operation Torch was the first time U.S. troops saw action against Nazi Germany, trapping Erwin Rommel ’s army in a pincer as it fled from El-Alamein.
nineteenth-century society continued to view musicians as glorified servants. group of answer choices true false
Answers
Using the theories of colonial history, we got that nineteenth-century society did not continued to view musicians as glorified servants.
New economic opportunities during this time actually helped to boost life expectancy and quality of life, but they also reinforced the class divides that had existed in Britain for centuries. Previously, the England was controlled by the landed gentry, or the wealthy land holders who gained their status through family lineages. During Victorian times, landed gentry became wealthy business owners who still controlled the politics and the economy.
Hence, nineteenth-century society continued to view musicians as glorified servants-it is wrong.
To know more about colonial history, visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29219594
#SPJ4
Which Telemachus' quote explains why Athena's advice changes the way he acts, speaks, and carries himself?
Question 2 options:
"Speak now and tell me what I should do to save the house of Odysseus from ruin."
"The kings and princes would have made him a burial-mound worthy of his name and his deeds, and I, his son, would not be imposed upon by such men as you see here."
"Already your gaze and speech make me feel equal to the task of dealing with [the suitors]."
"I know you have spoken out of a wise and friendly heart.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The quote that explains why Athena's advice changes the way Telemachus acts, speaks, and carries himself is:
"I know you have spoken out of a wise and friendly heart."
This quote indicates that Telemachus recognizes the wisdom and sincerity behind Athena's advice. He acknowledges that her words come from a place of genuine care and guidance. This understanding and trust in Athena's intentions influence his behavior, speech, and demeanor as he accepts and internalizes her counsel.
Which statement best explains the significance of the Mayflower Compact
It limited the power of future colonial governments
It weakened the influence of religion in government.
It established a form of self-government based on a social contract.
Answers
it established a form of self-government based on a social contract.
why does hoover believe that the future of freedom is at stake in the election of 1936? how does his definition of freedom differ from that of roosevelt?
Answers
Herbert Hoover believed that the future of freedom was at stake in the election of 1936 because he saw President Roosevelt's New Deal policies as a threat to individual freedom and economic liberty. In Hoover's view, the New Deal represented an expansion of federal power that would lead to government overreach, bureaucratic control, and a loss of individual autonomy. He believed that the New Deal would create a dependence on government and undermine the values of self-reliance and individual responsibility that were essential to American democracy.
Hoover's definition of freedom differed from that of Roosevelt in several key ways. For Hoover, freedom was primarily about individual rights and economic liberty. He believed that the government should play a limited role in the economy, and that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests and build their own businesses without undue interference from the government. Hoover's vision of freedom was rooted in a traditional laissez-faire approach to economics and a belief in the power of the market to regulate itself.
In contrast, Roosevelt's definition of freedom was more expansive, and focused on the role of government in protecting and promoting the well-being of all citizens. Roosevelt believed that freedom meant more than just individual rights and economic liberty, and that the government had a responsibility to ensure that all citizens had access to basic necessities like food, shelter, and healthcare. Roosevelt's New Deal policies were aimed at providing a safety net for those in need, and creating a more equitable society where all citizens had the opportunity to thrive.
why would edison’s home and laboratory be turned into a museum? use evidence from the text to support your answer. answer
Answers
Edison's home and laboratory would be turned into a museum to preserve his legacy and to showcase his inventions and contributions to science and technology.
This can be inferred from the fact that the home and laboratory have been preserved and are open to the public for tours, as well as from the mission statement of the museum that currently operates on the site.
The Thomas Edison National Historical Park, which includes Edison's home and laboratory in West Orange, New Jersey, was established in 1962 to "preserve, protect, and interpret the Laboratory Complex as an example of America's past industrial research and development."
The museum's mission is to "foster and promote a greater understanding and appreciation of the genius of Thomas Alva Edison, his inventions, and innovations."
To know more about Laboratory Complex click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30415088#
#SPJ11
The American colonies decided to make their new nation a republic because they
A.
wanted to follow the model of their ally, France
believed that a republic was the best government to safeguard their rights
B.
c.
wanted to emulate the government of Great Britain
D. believed that a republic was the only government that could effectively govern as large an area as the United States
Answers
Answer:
Correct Answer:
B. believed that a republic was the best government to safeguard their rights
Explanation:
America was a country founded on the freedom mantra where all individual were guaranteed their rights. This is why it is called the land of freedom. when the colonies broke out from the influence of England to form their own country, they decided to make their new nation a republic in order to ensure that, their freedom and rights are adequately protected always.
Many original settlers in the Carolinas came from
O Spain.
O Ireland.
O France.
O Barbados.
Answers
Answer:
Spain
Explanation:
How did Third Party affect elections in the late 1890’s?
Answers
Answer:
Since 1920, in fact, only four third-party candidates—Robert La Follette in Perot's third-party run did not alter the outcome of the election.
Explanation:
hope this helps
please brainliest
In Ghana, the dogs wore silver bracelets on their ankles.
O True
O False
please help?!!
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
For some reasn it deleted my explanation, but it was a link sorry. I am trying to get brainliest and its not working lol