the person who is designated to receive notices and service of process for a corporation is its ? A. General Agent B. Special Agent C. Registered Agent D. Factor

The statement that past consideration is irrelevant in the doctrine of Consideration is not entirely accurate. While past consideration generally lacks legal enforceability, there are exceptions where past consideration can be deemed valid.

Three applicable case laws on this subject matter are discussed below: Roscorla v. Thomas (1842): In this case, the plaintiff purchased a horse from the defendant. After the sale was complete, the defendant made a statement regarding the horse's soundness, which turned out to be false. The plaintiff sued for breach of warranty. The issue was whether the defendant's statement could be considered valid consideration. The court held that past consideration is insufficient, and there must be a present consideration to support a contract.

Lampleigh v. Braithwait (1615): The plaintiff had rendered services to the defendant by securing a pardon from the king. Afterward, the defendant promised to pay the plaintiff for his services. When the defendant refused to honor the promise, the plaintiff sued. The issue was whether the past consideration of the plaintiff's services was sufficient. The court held that although past consideration is generally insufficient, if it was done at the request of the promisor and with an expectation of reward, it could be valid consideration.

Re McArdle (1951): In this case, the family members of a deceased person agreed to distribute the deceased's estate according to his wishes. The plaintiff, one of the family members, carried out the deceased's wishes but was not compensated as promised. The issue was whether the past consideration of the plaintiff's actions constituted valid consideration. The court held that past consideration is not good consideration, and the plaintiff could not enforce the promise.

In conclusion, the statement that past consideration is irrelevant in the doctrine of Consideration is not entirely accurate. While past consideration is generally deemed insufficient to support a contract, there are exceptions where it can be considered valid. The cases of Roscorla v.

Thomas and Re McArdle demonstrate that past consideration alone is not enough to enforce a promise. However, the case of Lampleigh v. Braithwait highlights an exception to this rule, where past consideration can be valid if it was done at the promisor's request and with an expectation of reward.

Therefore, it is essential to consider the specific circumstances and nature of the promise when determining the relevance of past consideration.

To learn more about doctrine click here: brainly.com/question/12375851

#SPJ11

The statement that past consideration is irrelevant in the doctrine of Consideration is not entirely accurate. While past consideration generally lacks legal enforceability, there are exceptions where past consideration can be deemed valid.

Three applicable case laws on this subject matter are discussed below: Roscorla v. Thomas (1842): In this case, the plaintiff purchased a horse from the defendant. After the sale was complete, the defendant made a statement regarding the horse's soundness, which turned out to be false. The plaintiff sued for breach of warranty.

The issue was whether the defendant's statement could be considered valid consideration. The court held that past consideration is insufficient, and there must be a present consideration to support a contract.

Lampleigh v. Braithwait (1615): The plaintiff had rendered services to the defendant by securing a pardon from the king. Afterward, the defendant promised to pay the plaintiff for his services. When the defendant refused to honor the promise, the plaintiff sued.

The issue was whether the past consideration of the plaintiff's services was sufficient. The court held that although past consideration is generally insufficient, if it was done at the request of the promisor and with an expectation of reward, it could be valid consideration.

Re McArdle (1951): In this case, the family members of a deceased person agreed to distribute the deceased's estate according to his wishes. The plaintiff, one of the family members, carried out the deceased's wishes but was not compensated as promised. The issue was whether the past consideration of the plaintiff's actions constituted valid consideration. The court held that past consideration is not good consideration, and the plaintiff could not enforce the promise.

In conclusion, the statement that past consideration is irrelevant in the doctrine of Consideration is not entirely accurate. While past consideration is generally deemed insufficient to support a contract, there are exceptions where it can be considered valid. The cases of Roscorla v.

To learn more about doctrine click here: brainly.com/question/12375851

#SPJ11

Answer:

safety net

Explanation:

Answer:

He looks elegant

Explanation:

Answer:

100,000USD

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is False.

Explanation:

According to Rule 1.5 of the American Bar Association caption "Fees". Under section A, subsection 7,

The factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of a fee can include "the years of experience, reputation, and skill of the lawyer or lawyers whose expertise have engaged.

Some of the other factors that determine the reasonableness of a lawyers fee are:

Cheers

Answer:

The driver should focus on his driving, or there is a change of a car accident.

Answer:

Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1990 was a landmark piece of legislation that had a profound impact on the way states deliver healthcare services.

The act established a number of requirements for states in order to receive federal funding. Most notably, the act mandated that states establish a Medicaid fraud control unit, which is responsible for detecting and preventing fraud in the Medicaid system.

Additionally, the act required states to develop and implement quality assurance and utilization review programs for Medicaid services. Furthermore, OBRA established a National Practitioner Data Bank to track malpractice settlements and disciplinary actions taken against healthcare providers, in order to protect patients from negligent practitioners.

As a result of the OBRA, states are now required to meet a host of federal standards in order to ensure the safety, quality, and efficiency of healthcare services across the country.

Know more about Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act here

https://brainly.com/question/28265119#

#SPJ11

Except for hearing traffic ticket appeals, all of the following are permitted for justices of the peace (JP) courts in Texas.

Class C misdemeanor criminal charges, which are less serious minor violations, are under the original jurisdiction of justice of the peace courts. These courts are also able to handle minor civil disputes.

The Senate must give its consent before the President may designate Supreme Court justices. The Constitution mandates that judges serve during "good Behaviour," which has historically meant life terms, in order to guarantee an impartial judiciary and shield justices from partisan pressures.

To learn more about Senate here:

https://brainly.com/question/22932886

#SPJ4

The "rubber hand" illusion occurs only when sensory stimulation of a person's hand leads to a synchronized perception of touch and visual information.

This illusion is achieved by placing a rubber hand in front of a person and hiding their real hand out of sight. The rubber hand is then stroked at the same time as the person's hidden real hand, creating the illusion that the rubber hand is their own hand. This phenomenon occurs due to the brain's ability to integrate multisensory information and generate a coherent perception of the body in space.

A detailed long answer could include further explanation of the underlying neural mechanisms involved in the rubber hand illusion, as well as examples of related research in the field of embodied cognition.

To know more about Illusion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8919331

#SPJ11

Answer:

more

Explanation:

As Riley father was sentenced to five years for his part in the scam but, in one he waits daycare to meet her, what has most likely happened to Riley's father is he was released early on parole.

Basically, a parole refers to the conditional release of prisoners before they complete their sentence. The paroled prisoners are alwats supervised by a public official, usually called a parole officer. If the paroled prisoners violate the conditions of their release, they may be returned to prison.

For example, a paroled prisoners must get and keep a job, avoid drugs and alcohol, avoid their victims, not commit any crimes, and report regularly to their parole officer. But if the paroled prisoner violated his parole by violently assaulting someone, he would probably be returned to prison. If he ran a stop sign, he probably would not be.

Read more about parole

brainly.com/question/14467348

#SPJ1

Answer:

"I shot him because he assaulted me and I felt threatened" Make sure to put the answer in quotations

Explanation:

His claim of self-defense is likely to be "I shot him because he assaulted

me and I felt threatened because he pushed me to the ground"

This is a countermeasure which involves individuals protecting

themselves against harm.

Alfonso was assaulted and felt threatened which was why he acted in self-

defense by shooting George.

Read more about Self-defense here https://brainly.com/question/2920735

Betty would win since the person sitting next to her accidentally bumped into her, rather than falling into the lap of the movie star.

Only when someone tries to purposefully endanger you with harmful or offensive touches is the tort of assault admissible. This was not the circumstance here.

A legal definition of an assault may include the threat or actual commission of such an act as well as the act of inflicting physical injury or unwanted physical contact upon a person.

Due to the fact that it is both a crime and a tort, it could lead to either legal action or civil liability. In both criminal and tort law, the common law term is typically the same.

Learn more about assualt, from:

brainly.com/question/30028200

#SPJ4

The likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.

In law a deed can be defined as  a document that entails the agreed terms and conditions of a land ownership between two people  or two or more people or parties.

Based on the given scenario if the mother brought an action against her son wife after the dead of her son based on who the title of the farm belongs to, the mother might likely win the case because her son never accepted the deed of the land ownership.

Therefore the likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.

Learn more about deed here:https://brainly.com/question/4729037

#SPJ12

Answer:

$45.50

$15,925 (TOTAL), $507(PROFIT)

$3549

Explanation:

75%=.75

.75*26= 19.5

19.50+26.00= 45.50

350*45.5= 15925 or 19.5*26.00=507 not sure which one you actually want.

507*7 (days)= 3549

Hope this helps:) Have a good day!

Answer:

Well if we didn't have them we would be screwed!!

Murphy's motives for considering reliability ratings, gas-mileage savings, and warranty of a vehicle before deciding to purchase it are likely based on Reliability Ratings, Gas-Mileage Savings, Warranty.

Reliability Ratings: Murphy is interested in the reliability of the vehicle, which refers to its dependability and the likelihood of experiencing mechanical issues or breakdowns. Reliability ratings provide information on how well a vehicle is expected to perform and how often it may require repairs. Murphy's motive for considering reliability ratings suggests that he values a vehicle that will be durable and have a lower risk of unexpected problems.

Gas-Mileage Savings: Murphy is also considering the gas-mileage savings of the vehicle. This indicates that he is concerned about fuel efficiency and the amount of money he can save on fuel costs over time. Gas-mileage savings are important to individuals who want to minimize their fuel expenses, reduce their environmental impact, or have long commutes or frequent travels.

Warranty: Murphy is taking into account the warranty offered for the vehicle. A warranty is a promise by the manufacturer to repair or replace certain components or address specific issues within a specified period. Considering the warranty suggests that Murphy wants to have protection and reassurance in case any unforeseen issues arise with the vehicle shortly after purchase.

These factors indicate that Murphy's motives for considering reliability ratings, gas-mileage savings, and warranty are centered around the desire for a vehicle that is dependable, fuel-efficient, and supported by a warranty that offers peace of mind. By considering these factors, Murphy aims to make an informed decision and ensure that the chosen vehicle meets his expectations and requirements.

To know more about Gas-Mileage Savings, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29359773

#SPJ11

Discrimination in the purchasing or renting of real estate is regulated by Fair Housing Act.

When the Fair home Act was passed by Congress in 1968, one of its main goals was to outlaw racial discrimination in home sales and rentals. Nevertheless, racial discrimination in housing is still an issue more than 30 years later. The majority of complaints handled by the Justice Department follow a pattern or practise that alleges racial discrimination. Housing providers will occasionally make up information about the availability of housing in an effort to hide their discrimination, either by claiming that none was available or by directing homehunters to particular neighbourhoods depending on race. People who are given such inaccurate information or are misled may not even be aware that they have been the targets of prejudice. The Department of Justice has filed numerous lawsuits alleging this type of racial or ethnic discrimination.

To know more about real estate :

https://brainly.com/question/14423606

#SPJ4

Answer:

The rich would be powerful,

Explanation:

There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent

Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.

The IRAC principle is a common legal analysis method that stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. It is used to analyse legal cases and provide a structured analysis. Here are 6 case employment laws from the Caribbean, :

1. Case Law: Gibson v. Jamaican Airline Ltd.
The issue in this case was whether the airline's policy of mandatory retirement at age 60 violated employment discrimination laws.

The case involved a claim of age discrimination under employment laws. The court applied the relevant employment discrimination laws in the Caribbean and determined whether the airline's policy was in violation of these laws.

2. Case Law: Anderson v. Trinidad & Tobago Public Service Commission
The issue in this case was whether the government's requirement for male employees to retire at age 55 but allowing female employees to retire at age 60 violated the principle of gender equality.

This case examined gender equality in employment laws. The court analysed whether the different retirement ages for male and female employees constituted discrimination based on gender.

3. Case Law: Roberts v. Barbados Hotel Association
The issue in this case was whether the hotel association's decision to terminate an employee based on their sexual orientation violated employment laws.

This case dealt with discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment. The court examined whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

4. Case Law: Martin v. Antigua and Barbuda Broadcasting Service
The issue in this case was whether the broadcasting service's refusal to provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability violated employment laws.

The court analysed whether the broadcasting service's failure to provide reasonable accommodations constituted a violation of employment laws.

5. Case Law: Grant v. Cayman Islands Government
The issue in this case was whether the government's failure to pay overtime wages to certain employees violated employment laws.

This case dealt with the issue of overtime wages. The court examined whether the government's failure to pay overtime to certain employees was a violation of employment laws.

6. Case Law: Edwards v. Bahamas Maritime Authority
The issue in this case was whether the maritime authority's decision to terminate an employee based on their political affiliation violated employment laws.

This case focused on political discrimination in employment. The court analysed whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

To know more about  Employment laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32735711

#SPJ11

Language is intricately linked to cultural identity and plays a vital role in our interactions with others and the world around us.

Language is a fundamental aspect of cultural identity, as it reflects the values, beliefs, traditions, and social norms of a particular community or group. The way individuals communicate, the words they use, their accents, dialects, and expressions, all contribute to the cultural identity they belong to. Language not only shapes our perception of the world but also influences how we interact with others and understand the world around us.

Firstly, language serves as a vehicle for expressing cultural concepts and experiences. Each language carries unique vocabulary and expressions that capture specific cultural phenomena or perspectives. For example, certain languages have words that encapsulate cultural concepts such as "hygge" in  "saudade" in Portuguese, which are difficult to translate directly into other languages. These terms reflect deep cultural meanings and values that shape people's experiences and worldviews.

Furthermore, language influences communication styles and patterns within a culture. Different cultures may prioritize directness or indirectness, formality or informality, and levels of politeness in their language use. These communication styles reflect cultural norms and expectations and can greatly impact interactions with others. Understanding these nuances helps navigate social situations and build effective relationships across cultures.

Language also plays a significant role in preserving cultural heritage and fostering cultural pride. It serves as a means of passing down traditions, stories, and knowledge from one generation to another. Indigenous languages, for instance, are essential for preserving indigenous cultures and their connection to the land, history, and spirituality.

Additionally, language shapes our perception and understanding of the world. It influences how we categorize and describe objects, ideas, and experiences. Different languages have distinct ways of organizing and conceptualizing information. For instance, some languages have specific words for colors or concepts that may not exist in other languages, influencing how individuals perceive and interpret their surroundings.

Language also enables intercultural communication and understanding. When individuals are proficient in multiple languages, they can bridge cultural gaps, facilitate empathy, and foster meaningful connections with people from different backgrounds. Language proficiency allows individuals to access different perspectives, challenge biases, and engage in multicultural dialogues.

In conclusion, language is intricately linked to cultural identity and plays a vital role in our interactions with others and the world around us. It reflects cultural values, shapes communication patterns, preserves heritage, and influences how we perceive and understand our environment. Recognizing and appreciating the diverse linguistic and cultural landscape fosters mutual respect, intercultural understanding, and a richer global perspective.

for more such questions on interactions

https://brainly.com/question/31611724

#SPJ11

Sentencing guidelines are useful for optimizing and speeding up some legal processes, however, we cannot believe that they are used in the same way in all court cases.

Sentencing guidelines are very useful and speed up the legal process by allowing standards of assessment that allow greater clarity in assessing the nature and seriousness of the crime, helping to finalize the case.

However, as these cases have different characteristics and many different elements, the sentencing guidelines cannot be used in the same way in all cases and must adapt to each situation.

Learn more about sentencing guidelines:

https://brainly.com/question/31547228

#SPJ1

The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the United States Constitution that outlines the relationship between federal and state governments. It is an important aspect of the American system of government, and plays a key role in defining the powers and responsibilities of each level of government.

The Supremacy Clause is located in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution and states that "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

What this means is that when there is a conflict between federal law and state law, federal law takes precedence. This is because federal law is considered to be the supreme law of the land, and therefore must be followed by all states and all courts.

In practice, the Supremacy Clause allows the federal government to regulate areas that are deemed to be of national importance, such as commerce, immigration, and national defense, among others.

To learn more about Supremacy Clause refer here

https://brainly.com/question/27915892#
#SPJ11

(1) responding to an emergency call or pursuing a suspected violator of the law with probable cause to believe that:

(A) knowledge of the presence of the officer will cause the suspect to:

(i) destroy or lose evidence of a suspected felony;

(ii) end a suspected continuing felony before the officer has obtained sufficient evidence to establish grounds for arrest; or

(iii) hinder apprehension or identification of the suspect or the suspect's vehicle.