The answer is Article 3. New States may be formed, and existing States may have their areas, boundaries, or names changed, according to Article 3 of the Indian Constitution.
Contrary to the beliefs of the current Indian generation, the authors of the Indian constitution did not consider the states, districts, and mandals that make up India to be static, unchanging, or permanent. As a result, they included provisions for the addition of new states to the Indian Union because they had the maturity to accept that states would develop and change.Article 3 says, Parliament may by law: (a) create a new State by separating territory from an existing State, joining two or more States together, or joining portions of States;any state's size could be increased, decreased, or its borders could be changed;the area, boundaries, or name of any State; Provided, however, that no Bill for such purposes shall be introduced in either House of Parliament except on the President's recommendation and unless the proposal contained in the Bill has an impact on any of the States' area, boundaries, or name;As a result, article 3 covers state rights and the procedure for admitting new states to the union.
Learn more about Article 3 of the Indian Constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/18256137
#SPJ4
if someone robs a bank, they have violated which type of law? a. regulatory law b. criminal law c. administrative law d. civil law
If someone robs a bank, they have violated criminal law.
What does criminal law have to do with?Criminal law deals with offenses against society, and the state takes action to prosecute the offender.
Robbery is a serious criminal offense, and if caught, the offender may face severe penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Regulatory law, on the other hand, deals with regulations that govern certain industries or activities, such as environmental regulations or workplace safety standards. Administrative law governs the relationship between individuals and the government
Read more about criminal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1242041
#SPJ1
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties as long as certain conditions are met. Identify these conditions. (Check all that apply.)
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties as long as certain conditions are met. Identify these conditions. (Check all that apply.)
People are protesting in iran over the death in police custody of a 22-year-old woman. Tehran’s morality police had arrested her for violating a law on what?.
After being brought into custody by Tehran's morality police for breaking the law, they discovered her clothed in what they believed to be lewd clothing at the police station, where she later went into a coma.
The capital of Iran is Tehran, which is located in the country's north. The Qajar dynasty ruled over the Golestan Palace complex, which features elaborate chambers and a marble throne. The National Jewelry Museum houses many of the Qajar rulers' jewels, while the National Museum of Iran houses artifacts from the Paleolithic. Views of the entire city are available from the Milad Tower.
The "Islamic clothing code," as it is known, has long been supported by the Iranian government. The so-called morality police in Tehran seized Mahsa Amini, 22, for wearing what they deemed to be inappropriate clothing. As she was being taken to the police station, she passed out and later died. Three days later, she passed dead in a hospital.
To know more about Tehran refer to: https://brainly.com/question/13420924
#SPJ4
why do you think that csi presents its storylines in terms of scientific fact rather then exploring the indeterminate nature of several forensic techniques?
Answer:
CSI presents its storylines in terms of scientific fact to enhance the credibility of the show and to appeal to viewers who are interested in science and technology. Additionally, presenting forensic techniques as scientific fact may make the show more engaging and captivating for viewers, who may enjoy trying to solve the mysteries along with the characters. However, it is worth noting that the show is a fictional representation of forensic investigation and does not necessarily accurately reflect the complexities of real-life forensic techniques and their interpretation.
a search is unreasonable if the government official conducting the search does not first obtain a from a court.
A search is unreasonable if a search warrant is not obtained from the court by the governmental official conducting the search.
Searching any residential, business place etc. without a warrant will be illegal, unreasonable and violation of the 4th amendment. Any evidence collected during this search will not be considered valid at trial.
It aims to deter the government officials from conducting unreasonable searches. To obtain the search warrant it is necessary to describe the details about the search such as the specific area of the search, what things can be seized, etc. This is also called the "Exclusionary rule."
To know more about search warrant, click here: brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ4
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to avoid an illegal activity. to secure her privacy rights. to challenge the Ninth Amendment. to have a state law declared unconstitutional.
Answer:
to have a law declared unconstitutional
Explanation:
Jane Roe sued the state of Texas because she wanted to have a law declared unconstitutional.
What is the right Jane Roe fought for?Jane Roe fought for the right for an abortion which was covered under the right to privacy.
Howver,, because the Texas law prohibits abortion, the case between her and the state led to the Supreme court for final ruling.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Jane Roe case
brainly.com/question/10184794
You overhear your friend complaining that he's upset there's no way to change the constitution
Go live in L'Manburg.
does cost-benefit anaylsis such as the ford pinto case invalidate the utilitarian argument
Cost-benefit analysis is a popular economic tool used to determine the economic feasibility of a project or policy by weighing the costs and benefits of an investment or decision.
One well-known example of cost-benefit analysis is the Ford Pinto case, where the company made a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was worth investing in a costly design change that would prevent the car from bursting into flames in a rear-end collision.
However, the Ford Pinto case raises questions about the ethics of cost-benefit analysis and its validity as a decision-making tool. Utilitarianism, as a moral philosophy, argues that actions should be based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
The Ford Pinto case highlights a potential flaw in cost-benefit analysis as it seems to prioritize monetary considerations over the well-being of individuals and society.
To read more about cost-benefit analysis, Visit- https://brainly.com/question/14556838
#SPJ11
Which criteria does the court use to decide whether to hear a case?.
The criteria used by the courts to determine the importance of a case are
the case is relevant/timely the issue is not moot parties have standing, or a stake, in the outcome.What is a court case?Generally, In the broadest sense, a legal case may be understood as a disagreement between opposing parties that are brought before a court or another analogous legal procedure in order to be settled.
A legal dispute will often revolve around either civil law or criminal law as its foundation. In the vast majority of cases brought before a court, there will be one or more people bringing charges against the defendant(s).
the court, also known as a court of law, is a person or set of individuals with judicial jurisdiction to hear and decide disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military cases. Courts hear and decide cases in all types of legal matters.
Read more about the courts case
https://brainly.com/question/4564773
#SPJ1
lul +z=Lulz
lul=lol plz help
A property was listed for $640,000, but eventually sold for $580,000. The seller paid a commission of 5%. How much did the listing broker earn as a commission?
i think that the listing guy earned 60k
The amount of commission that the listing broker earned from the property that was listed for $640,000 but sold for $580,000 was $29,000.
Who is a listing broker?A listing broker is a real estate agent that lists properties for sale. The listing broker can be differentiated from the selling broker.
The selling broker works with the buyer of the real estate property while the listing broker works for the interest of the property owner.
The important question is, is the listing broker paid a commission based on the listing price or selling price? The listing broker's commission is based on the selling price and not the listing price.
Data and Calculations:The list price of property = $640,000
Sales price = $580,000
Commission paid by the seller = 5%
Listing broker's commission = $29,000 ($580,000 x 5%)
Thus, the listing broker earned a commission of $29,000.
Learn more about listing broker's commissions at https://brainly.com/question/14838861
true or false: the chinese government passed a law that provided private property owners with the same protections granted to the state. hernando de soto would be in favor of this law.
The given statement "the chinese government passed a law that provided private property owners with the same protections granted to the state. hernando de soto would be in favor of this law." is False because Hernando de Soto would not be in favor of this law.
He was a strong advocate for the protection of the property rights of individuals and the need for developing countries to recognize and protect such rights.
De Soto argued that without secure property rights, individuals cannot use their assets as collateral for financial transactions, leaving them susceptible to exploitation by the state and unable to benefit from their resources. Thus, de Soto would not be supportive of a law that provided the same protections to the state as to individual property owners.
To know more about advocate , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28272829
#SPJ4
Whose job is it to protect the judge and others in the courtroom?
a) Police Officers
b) Bailiffs
c) Sheriffs
d) Special Agents
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial. They say it is a question of competence. What does this most likely mean?
A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
B. The evidence in Kendall’s case is inconclusive and doesn’t prove anything.
C. Kendall is an expert witness who has testified many times before.
D. The police think it will hurt their case if Kendall chooses to testify.
In a case whereby Detectives are unsure whether Kendall post well will be able to testify at her trial and say it is a question of competence means that A. Kendall might be determined to be insane and not qualified to testify.
What is a trial ?A trial can be described a the formal examination of evidence which is been done in the court by the judge that is in charge and this been performed when the jury is available so that the guilt in a case of criminal can be known.
It should be note that in the case above the question came out to know how fit is Kendall might be .
Therefore, option A is correct.
Read more about Detectives at:
https://brainly.com/question/26059088
#SPJ1
How does use of cargo containers benefit the economy?
Answer:
The use of cargo containers benefit the economy by keeping distribution costs low.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Washoe Medical Center, Inc., admitted Shirley Swisher for the treatment of a fractured pelvis. During her stay, Swisher suffered a fatal fall from her hospital bed. Gerald Parodi, the administrator of her estate, and others filed an action against Washoe seeking damages for the alleged lack of care in treating Swisher. During voir dire, when the plaintiffs’ attorney returned a few minutes late from a break, the trial judge led the prospective jurors in a standing ovation. Later during voir dire, the judge joked with one of the prospective jurors, whom he had known in college, about his fitness to serve as a judge and personally endorsed another prospective juror’s business. After the trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Washoe. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, but the judge denied the motion. The plaintiffs then appealed, arguing that the tone set by the judge during voir dire prejudiced their right to a fair trial. Should the appellate court agree? Why or why not? E
Answer:
Shirley Swisher Vs Washoe Medical Center, Inc.
The tone and conduct of the trial judge were inappropriate and they also prejudice the plaintiffs' right to a fair trial.
Based on the above, the appellate court should agree with the plaintiffs. The case should be remanded for retrial by another judge.
Explanation:
The overt behavior of joking with a juror in addition to the outspoken remarks, by leading a standing ovation, the trial judge will certainly cause the jurors to render verdicts that may not be balanced, fair, and objective. The judge did not act professionally as a neutral arbitrator in the case. He is supposed to provide the correct environment for a fair trial and not to constitute a source of public nuisance. By his conduct, he caused the jurors to return a verdict against Shirley Swisher. Instead of acting as a neutral arbiter, he became an involved party, forcing the jurors to take his sides.
What is your first obligation in case you are involved in an accident
Stop immediately: It is important to stop the vehicle immediately and move it off the road if possible to avoid further accidents.
Check for injuries: Check yourself, passengers, pedestrians, and occupants of other vehicles involved in the accident for injuries. If anyone is injured, call for medical assistance immediately. police: Contact the police and report the accident. They will provide instructions on what to do next and may file a police report.
Exchange information: Exchange contact and insurance information with the other driver(s) involved in the accident. Get their name, address, phone number, and insurance company information.
Gather evidence: Take photographs of the damage to all vehicles involved and the accident scene. Collect eyewitness accounts if available.
Cooperate with the authorities: Answer all questions from the police and provide all the necessary information they require. Avoid admitting fault or making any statements that could be used against you later.
learn more about evidence here :
https://brainly.com/question/15880833
#SPJ11
Mandy volunteered in a month-long sleep study at the university last year. She was asked to participate because of her unusual sleep habits and neurological history. Part of the sleep study included her sleeping in a room inside the lab for the entire month. She was videotaped while she slept. Now, 13 months later, police are trying to charge Mandy with possession and use of illegal drugs. It turns out she was using drugs during her stay at the sleep lab. Her drug use was recorded in the lab videos. She's not sure how or why the police saw the videos. She knew she was being videotaped, although she was told it was only for the study and that no one outside the lab would view the footage.
Would the video evidence be helpful in proving the case? (Answer in one to two sentences. Explain your reasoning.)
No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.
She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.
What is neurology?The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.
The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.
Learn more about neurology, from:
brainly.com/question/7165863
#SPJ1
Equity relief gives money to the plaintiff for damages by ordering the defendant to pay true or false
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Which of the following is not a function of the Federal Trade Commission?
Using your z-score table, find P(z < 1.89)
Police officer misperception of public attitudes is the result of several factors most important the pattern of:
Police officer misperception of public attitudes is the result of several factors, with one of the most important being the pattern of Limited interaction.
What leads to police officer misperception ?Police officer misperception of public attitudes stems from various factors, but one of utmost significance lies in the recurrent pattern of circumstances. Firstly, limited interaction plagues officers, who predominantly engage with the public during moments of conflict, crisis, or law enforcement activities.
These encounters frequently embody confrontations, arrests, or other adversarial incidents. Consequently, such constrained and predominantly negative interactions can distort officers' perception of public attitudes, instilling a skewed understanding.
Find out more on police officers at https://brainly.com/question/30409912
#SPJ1
Police officer misperception of public attitudes is primarily the result of the pattern of selective contact. Selective contact refers to the tendency of police officers to disproportionately interact with individuals who are involved in criminal activities or engaged in confrontational encounters.
Due to the nature of their work, officers often have more frequent and intense interactions with individuals who are non-compliant, aggressive, or involved in criminal behavior. These interactions can create a skewed perception of the general public's attitudes and behaviors. It is crucial for police departments to address this issue by promoting community-oriented policing strategies that encourage positive interactions with law-abiding community members and foster trust and collaboration between the police and the public they serve.
To know more about the factors contributing to police officer misperception of public attitudes, click here: brainly.com/question/24708243
#SPJ11
-Phân biệt giá cổ phiếu với mệnh giá cổ phiếu?
ai giải giúp với ạ
Answer:
i cant understand sorry
Government policy-makers often must decide how to balance the potential benefits of __________ against the potential benefits of __________.
a. nationalization; privatization
b. competition; nationalization
c. corporate size; predatory pricing
d. corporate size; competition
d. corporate size; competition
Government policymakers often have to make decisions regarding how to balance the potential benefits of corporate size against the potential benefits of competition. This involves considering the advantages and disadvantages of allowing companies to grow larger and potentially dominate the market versus promoting a competitive market environment with multiple players.
Corporate Size: Allowing corporations to grow larger can bring certain benefits, such as economies of scale, increased efficiency, and the ability to invest in research and development. Large corporations may also have the resources to expand into new markets, create jobs, and contribute to economic growth.
Competition: Maintaining a competitive market environment is also crucial. Competition can lead to innovation, improved quality, lower prices, and greater consumer choice. It can drive companies to constantly improve and offer better products or services. Moreover, competition prevents monopolistic practices and promotes fair business practices.
Policy-makers must find the right balance between encouraging corporate growth and maintaining healthy competition. They may need to implement regulations, antitrust laws, or other measures to prevent monopolies, promote fair competition, and protect consumer interests while still allowing companies to thrive and contribute to economic development.
know more about policymakers.
https://brainly.com/question/30235859
#SPJ11
If Massachusetts has a sales tax of 6 percent and New Hampshire has no sales tax, how much money can be saved by buying a $1,000 television in New Hampshire? O $6 O $16 O $60 O $600
Answer:
$60
Explanation:
6 percent of 1,000 is 60
Based on the tax in both states, the amount that you would save is $60.
Purchase price of television in Massachusetts= Purchase price x ( 1 + sales tax)
= 1,000 x ( 1 + 6%)
= $1,060
Difference between price in both states.= Price in Massachusetts - Price in New Hampshire
= 1,060 - 1,000
= $60
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on sales tax at https://brainly.com/question/9437038.
What do you think society should do to deal with prostitution?
Answer:
Training and creating jobs for income generation, poverty alleviation and hunger reduction
Explanation:
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST :)
what are the principal noncharacter uses "other crimes" evidence?
Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is available for "non-character purposes," such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident.
brainliest? (❁´◡`❁)
the courts in law systems such as the one in the united states have developed a body of law that serves as precedent for determination of later controversies. this is sometimes called:
In common law regimes, the courts have produced a body of law (decisions/opinions) that acts as precedent for resolving further disputes. These disputes are referred to be judge-made, case, and common.
In the modern world, civil law, common law, not uncommon law, spiritual law, and mixed legal frameworks are generally regarded as the five major legal systems. Civil law systems have their roots in Roman criminal culture.
The civil law, common law, statutory law, religious law, or combinations of these are often the foundations of the current country-wide jail systems. However, each United States of America's criminal justice system is shaped by its own unique records and hence has individual variations.
Our constitution, the constitutions of the other countries, federal and foreign legislation, common law, case law, and administrative regulation are the main sources of law in the United States.
For such more question on common law regimes.
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4