Answer:
have public security.
station of firemen.
system of consumable water and drainer
the authors state that governmental policy does not necessarily reflect the interests—indeed, the welfare—of the public, even though it is intended to do so. which is not a reason given for this
There could be several reasons why government policy may not necessarily reflect the interests or welfare of the public, even if it is intended to do so.
One possible reason is that politicians and policymakers may have their own personal interests or biases that influence their decision-making, which may not align with those of the public. Additionally, political parties and special interest groups may have a significant influence on the policy-making process, often prioritizing their own interests over the broader public interest. Another reason could be the inherent complexity of policymaking, which can involve balancing multiple competing interests and priorities, making it difficult to fully satisfy everyone. Finally, limited resources and budget constraints may force policymakers to make difficult choices that may not always align with the interests of the public. Ultimately, the reasons why governmental policy may not always reflect the interests or welfare of the public are complex and multifaceted, and require careful consideration and analysis to fully understand.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
child support
child support laws in Washington
3. Describe at least two other times since the Pickering decision in which the Supreme Court revisited the ruling. What were the outcomes? 4. According to the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act, what are the three elements of a wrongful discharge?
3. Since the Pickering decision, the Supreme Court has revisited the ruling on two other occasions.
One of these occasions was in the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos in 2006. In this case, Richard Ceballos, a deputy district attorney, claimed that he faced retaliation after he wrote a memo about potential misconduct by law enforcement officers. The Supreme Court revisited the Pickering balancing test and concluded that when public employees speak as part of their official duties, their speech is not protected by the First Amendment. Therefore, the outcome of this case was that Ceballos did not receive protection under the Pickering decision.
Another occasion when the Supreme Court revisited the Pickering decision was in the case of Lane v. Franks in 2014. Edward Lane, a community college employee, testified truthfully about the alleged fraudulent activities of a state legislator during a criminal trial. Lane was subsequently terminated from his job and claimed that his termination violated his First Amendment rights. The Supreme Court, in this case, clarified that when public employees testify truthfully about matters of public concern, their speech is protected by the First Amendment. Therefore, the outcome of this case was that Lane's termination was deemed unconstitutional under the Pickering decision.
4. According to the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act, there are three elements of a wrongful discharge:
- First, the employee must have been discharged. This means that their employment was terminated by their employer.
- Second, the discharge must have been wrongful. This means that the employer violated one or more of the employee's rights or breached an employment contract.
- Third, the wrongful discharge must be the cause of the employee's damages. This means that the employee suffered some form of harm or loss as a result of the wrongful termination.
These three elements must be met in order to establish a claim for wrongful discharge under the Montana Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act.
To know more about supreme court, visit:
brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
the rationale for attempt crimes focuses on what two types of danger?
Create and Amendment should be designed to advance majoritarian democracy and add explanation why
Answer:
Because the amendments are created to bring about changes in federal laws.
Explanation:
The amendments cause changes in the constitution, which means that a law will be modified, where elements of its constitution will be added or removed, thus modifying various social, political or economic factors. Amendments are a very delicate process and they must be discussed a lot by the power they have, for this reason, the creation of a demand must have the capacity to explain itself and to promote a democratic process.
E-Verify can be used for which of the following?
(Select one)
Answer: List?
Explanation:
Which statement accurately describes the Articles of Confederation?
1- it created a central government with only a legislative branch
2- it created a central government with both a legislative and a judicial branch
3- it created a central government with both an executive and a judicial branch
4- it created a central government with only an executive branch
Many jurisdictions/organizations configure their EOCs using the standard _______ organizational structure? A). Incident Command System (ICS) B). Incident Coordination Point (ICP) C). Joint Information Center (JIC) D). Regional Response Coordination Center (RRCC)
Many jurisdictions/organizations configure their EOCs using the standard Incident Command System (ICS) organizational structure.
What is Incident Command System (ICS) organisational structure?A standardized method for command, control, and coordination of emergency response, the Incident Command System (ICS) creates a common structure within which responders from various agencies can function effectively. System for Incident Command (ICS) Governmental organizations, the fire department, and the police use the ICS, a hierarchical management system, to respond to an emergency.
Learn more on jurisdictions here:
brainly.com/question/30158730
#SPJ4
Anyone know the answer to this?
HELP ANYONE PLEASE ANSWER FOR ME AND I WILL MARK YOU BRANLIEST WHOEVER ANSWER FIRST AND CORRECT
Answer:
a member of congress
Explanation:
I think im not 100% though
Gilbert wants to initiate a suit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint. The complaint should include
The thing which the complaint should include is b. a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
What is a Lawsuit?This refers to the class action that is filed by a person or company against another in a law court, seeking redress.
Hence, we can see that based on the tenets of law, if Gilbert wants to initiate a lawsuit against Healthways Insurance Company by filing a complaint, he should include a statement alleging the facts showing the court has jurisdiction.
Read more about lawsuits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1184001
#SPJ1
Sayid is a corrections officer in the county jail. What might be one
task that Sayid performs as part of his job?
The correct answer is B: accompanying inmates to and from court.
What is the name of the military technique that involves the shooter rapid firing to clear a path while advancing upon the target? slicing the pie rapid fire advanancement full deployment sounding off
The military technique that involves the shooter rapid firing to clear a path while advancing upon the target is called "rapid fire advancement."
This technique is often used when soldiers need to quickly advance upon an enemy position and clear out any resistance in their way. Rapid fire advancement involves firing rounds rapidly in the direction of the enemy while simultaneously advancing forward. This technique is meant to suppress the enemy and create enough cover fire to allow the advancing soldiers to safely move forward. Rapid fire advancement is a crucial tactics in modern warfare, as it allows soldiers to quickly gain ground and take control of the battlefield. It requires a high level of skill and training, as well as the ability to quickly assess the situation and make split-second decisions. When executed properly, rapid fire advancement can be an extremely effective way to gain a tactical advantage over the enemy.
Learn more about tactics here:
https://brainly.com/question/29469266
#SPJ11
what is the sum of pie dont anwser if you dontknow
Answer:
Its "PI" first of all and the sum of pi is approximately equal to 3.14159 or π over 4. It has been represented by the Greek letter "π" since the mid-18th century, and is spelled out as "pi".
Explanation:
Hope that helped you
Give the other person brainliest
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4
Some estimates indicate that corporate crime may cost society more than $389 billion dollars each year.
True
False
Answer:
This is true, corporate crime is difficult to prove, and difficult to discover.
What are the heads of each
department called?
Answer:
it is called the cabinet
Explanation:
The Cabinet is a group of president's top advisors.
does law of large numbers apply to accidents on aeroplane
Yes, the Law of Large Numbers can be applied to accidents involving airplanes.
The Law of Large Numbers is a statistical principle that states that as the sample size increases, the average of the sample will tend to approach the expected value of the underlying population. In the context of airplane accidents, this means that as the number of flights increases, the observed accident rate will converge to the true accident rate.
Airplane accidents are rare events, but they can still be analyzed statistically. A large number of flights take place daily, providing ample data for analysis. As more flights are conducted, the overall trend of accident rates becomes clearer, allowing researchers and safety experts to identify patterns and implement preventive measures.
The Law of Large Numbers can be helpful in understanding the safety of air travel. It allows aviation experts to assess the effectiveness of safety protocols and make informed decisions about necessary improvements. As the number of flights continues to grow, the law ensures that the observed accident rates will provide an accurate representation of the true risks associated with air travel. This information is crucial for maintaining and enhancing safety standards in the aviation industry.
In conclusion, the Law of Large Numbers does apply to airplane accidents, as it helps analyze the safety of air travel and contributes to the development of effective safety measures. With an increasing number of flights, the statistical analysis of accident rates becomes more reliable, allowing for a better understanding of risks and the implementation of necessary safety improvements.
Know more about statistical principle here:
https://brainly.com/question/30592795
#SPJ11
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law:____.a. is only a state misdemeanor b. is always a federal crime c. results in prison penalties up to 20 years d. results in a maximum fine of $300,000
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000
The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.
The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.
For such more question on theft:
brainly.com/question/30293258
#SPJ4
What essential conditions are necessary for a combustion reaction (fire triangle)?
The three essential conditions necessary for a combustion reaction are commonly referred to as the "fire triangle." These three conditions are: Heat, Fuel and Oxygen.
What is combustion reaction?
Combustion reaction is a type of exothermic chemical reaction that occurs between a fuel and an oxidizing agent (typically oxygen), resulting in the release of energy in the form of heat and light. In a combustion reaction, the fuel reacts with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide, water, and other combustion products.
1. Heat: Sufficient heat must be present to raise the temperature of the fuel to its ignition point. This heat can come from sources such as a spark, a flame, or friction.
2. Fuel: There must be a combustible fuel present, such as wood, gasoline, or paper. The fuel provides the material that will be oxidized in the reaction.
3. Oxygen: Oxygen is necessary for combustion to occur. It reacts with the fuel, releasing energy in the form of heat and light. In most cases, air provides the necessary oxygen.
If any of these three conditions are absent or removed, the combustion reaction cannot occur or will be extinguished. For example, removing the heat source, cutting off the fuel supply, or smothering the fire with a fire extinguisher can stop the reaction.
To know more about combustion reaction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23146159
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Ralph received an inheritance of $30,000 from his aunt’s estate. He then bought a used sports car from Sid and paid $25,000 cash. Shortly thereafter, Ralph realized that Sid had fraudulently misstated the car’s mileage, horsepower, and engine condition. At the same time, Ralph realized he needed $15,000 in cash to close a real estate deal. As a consequence, he took out a loan using the sports car as collateral. a) Could Ralph still avoid and rescind the contract for the purchase of the car? b) Could he take any other legal action against Sid?
a) Ralph could void and rescind the contract with Sid the car because of fraud.
He had already paid Sid the sum of $25,000 for the car, whose mileage, horsepower, and engine condition were fraudulently misstated.
b) Ralph could take legal action against Sid to recover value for the fraudulent misstatements.
Thus, Ralph should immediately sue Sid to void the contract or recover damages.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/10084927
What is an example of an expressed power of Congress What is an example of an implied power of Congress?.
An example of an implied power of Congress will be Tax collection.
The Constitution gives Congress both explicit and implied powers, or those that are not explicitly specified but that Congress may assume in order to exercise its express powers. The ability to declare war, control international trade and relations, issue currency, build and maintain a military are a few examples of these powers.
Political authority granted to the United States government that isn't expressly defined in the Constitution is known as implied power. Due to precedents established by other powers, it is assumed that these will be granted.
To know more about implied power of Congress visit :
https://brainly.com/question/368816
#SPJ4
What are the three main forms of city government?
Answer: legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Hope this helped: )
What is another name for the first day of winter
Answer:
winter solstice that's all I have
Explanation:
enough
Answer:
Winter solstice
Explanation:
This astronomical event appears on calendars as the first day of winter—but meteorologists have already gotten a head start on the season.
Do you think that the dairy industry is an example of a purely competitive market? Why or why not? If not, what industry is?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it record everything
relative to the notion of democratic government, the supreme court's power of judicial review
In a democratic government, the Supreme Court's power of judicial review is essential for maintaining a balance of power and ensuring the constitutionality of laws. Through judicial review, the court examines legislation and executive actions to determine if they align with the principles of the constitution. This process helps safeguard the democratic values, protect minority rights, and prevent the abuse of power by other branches of government. In essence, judicial review contributes to the overall stability and legitimacy of a democratic system by preserving the rule of law and the fundamental rights of citizens.
In a democratic government, the power of the Supreme Court to conduct judicial review plays a critical role in ensuring that laws and policies are consistent with the principles of democracy. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to evaluate the constitutionality of legislation and executive actions, thereby ensuring that the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution. The Court's power of judicial review is critical in ensuring that the rights and freedoms of citizens are protected, and that the government operates in a manner that is fair and just. This power of the Court serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power, ensuring that the government remains accountable to the people it serves.The Supreme Court's power of judicial review serves as a vital mechanism in ensuring that democratic principles are upheld in a democratic government.
To know more about judicial review visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ11
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
What does "proof" mean?
Answer:
In the context of law, "proof" refers to the evidence presented to support a claim or assertion, and the level of certainty that the evidence establishes. The proof is used to convince a judge or jury that a particular fact or proposition is true and to satisfy the burden of proof required to establish a legal claim or defense.
Answer:
Explanation:
Proof is defined as twice the alcohol (ethanol) content by volume. For example, a whisky with 50% alcohol is 100-proof whiskey
Almost half of the US states have enacted so-called Right to Work laws. Explain what these laws are. Use your text and web sources to get a clear understanding of these laws, and whether they are fair to unions and union members. Look at the issue from both the union's point of view and from the point of view of employees who don't want union representation. Make your answer complete for full credit.