The Newtonian mechanics theory explains how to determine the equations of motion for an n−body system And it was brought up by Isaac Newton.
What is Newtonian mechanics theory ?
Newtonian mechanics can be described as the theory that is based on the application of Newton's Laws of motion that uses the concepts of distance, time, as well as mass, which are absolute.
Hence, Newtonian mechanics theory explains how to determine the equations of motion for an n−body system And it was brought up by Isaac Newton.
Learn more on Newtonian mechanics theory at:
https://brainly.com/question/12791435
#SPJ1
Tricia found a body that is in rigor mortis. How was she MOST likely to determine that this was happening?
A.
The body was the temperature of the air surrounding it.
B. The body was very rigid and stiff.
C.
The body had pools of blood in it.
D.
The body had lost a lot of tissue and was mainly bones.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
what is the exucutive branch responsibility in policy implementation
Should a social worker (not known by the child) be able to go into his/her room without concent from the child and with the child there
(Note: this is for no good reason / purpose to visit with no health or safety concerns)
Answer:
no they should not because a authority figure did not give consent
Which statement best describes a scientific law?
O A. It explains why certain events occur.
O B. It describes what happens under a set of conditions.
O C. It is a statement of opinion made by a scientist.
OD. It is a rule agreed upon by all scientists.
100 POINTS and brainless
What are the possible (1) charges and (2) punishments for the following? Fred enters a house through an open window in the basement. He goes upstairs to where eleven year old Polly lays sleeping. He picks her up and takes her back to his house across the street. Once there he has sex with her and then strangles her. He throws her body into the woods down the road?
Answer:
charges are breaking and entering, kidnapping, how old is fred? polly's age? if he is older statry rpe, domestic assault, illegal dumping and murder.
Explanation:
48yrs to life
Assess the roles of the High Court of Australia and the federal parliament in achieving just outcomes in regard to native title.
The High Court of Australia interprets native title laws and the federal parliament creates and amends these laws to achieve just outcomes for native title holders.
The High Court of Australia plays a crucial role in interpreting and clarifying the native title laws to ensure that native title holders receive just outcomes.
The court has made significant rulings that have clarified the rights and interests of native title holders, including the landmark Mabo decision.
On the other hand, the federal parliament is responsible for creating and amending the native title laws.
This legislative body plays a critical role in ensuring that the laws align with societal values and are just and fair to all parties involved.
Together, the High Court of Australia and the federal parliament work towards achieving just outcomes for native title holders.
For more such questions on federal parliament, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/16380894
#SPJ8
Distinguish between the concepts of governmental crime, state crime, and political white collar crime. Identify as well the special significance of the following concepts: abuse of power, corruption, bribery, and political scandal. In what respects are the first set of concepts controversial, and how do they relate to the traditional concept of white collar crime? Why has governmental crime been relatively neglected by criminologists?
5 scarves 2 of them are green if he chooses 1 scarf at random what is the probabillity its green write your answer as a fraction and a decimal
What is the difference between bias and perspective, if there is a difference, and how can/should they be handled differently?
Bias and perspective are two terms that are often used interchangeably but they are slightly different. Bias is an inclination that someone has towards a certain idea or opinion based on preconceived notions or a personal opinion. Perspective is how someone views a specific situation, which is based on a combination of many influences including beliefs, values, and experiences.
Bias should be handled by listening to the argument of others nonjudgmentally, understanding the evidence that is being presented, and striving to make unbiased decisions or conclusions. Perspective is best handled by actively listening and considering the ideas of others without judgement, then working together to reach an opinion that is inclusive of all perspectives.
In chromatography, scientists use chemicals that can separate the parts of the mixture. These chemicals are called _______. (eight letters)
Answer:
Explanation:
In chromatography, the chemicals that are used to separate the components of a mixture are called "solvents".
The process works because different compounds in the mixture have different affinities for the stationary phase and the mobile phase. The stationary phase is usually a solid or a liquid that is immobile and the mobile phase is a liquid or a gas that is continuously flowing.
The solvent is the liquid that is used as the mobile phase. It is passed through the stationary phase, which can be a solid or a liquid, and the components of the mixture are separated based on their interactions with the stationary and mobile phases.
There are several types of chromatography that use different solvents and stationary phases, such as:
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) uses a thin layer of silica or alumina on a glass plate as the stationary phase, and a solvent such as ethyl acetate or hexane as the mobile phase.
Gas Chromatography (GC) uses a solid stationary phase such as a porous beads, and the mobile phase is a gas such as helium, hydrogen or nitrogen.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) uses a liquid stationary phase, which is usually a chemically-bonded silica, and solvents such as acetonitrile, methanol or water as the mobile phase.
Each of these methods can separate different compounds based on their chemical and physical properties, thus making it possible for scientists to identify and quantitate the components of a mixture.
If you are charged with the crime of armed robbery, your trial would take place in which type of court
Answer:
County Criminal Court
Explanation:
That is a really good question! if you are charged with armed robbery, which is treated as a serious offense in most states, let me tell you, have a good lawyer! because You could be looking at years in prison depending on the circumstance and if you face additional charges, But if you do get charged with armed robbery, you would check your mailbox one day and find that you are ordered to go to the "County Criminal Court" as I stated in my answer above.
- I wish for my name to not be stated, Criminal Defense Attorney-At-Law, PhD, Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.
If a victim is found with poison inside their cells after death, what can a forensic scientist reasonably conclude?
Active transport moved the toxin into the cells before death.
OActive transport moved the toxin into the cells after death.
O Passive transport moved the toxin out of cells before death.
O Passive transport moved the toxin into cells after death.
Option A. The conclusion that the forensic scientist would have to get to would be that Active transport moved the toxin into the cells before death..
Who is a forensic scientists?A crucial component of the criminal justice system is forensic science. To produce unbiased conclusions that can aid in the investigation and prosecution of crime perpetrators or clear an innocent person of suspicion, forensic scientists examine and analyze evidence from crime scenes and other locations.
A forensic scientist gathers evidence from objects at the crime scene using their in-depth understanding of biology and chemistry. They use scientific methods to determine DNA strands, blood types, and other crucial crime scene data.
Read more on forensic science here: https://brainly.com/question/19238665
#SPJ1
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.
According to the Constitution, who holds the power to create lower federal courts?
A. the chief executive
B. the Supreme Court
C. the individual states
D. the federal legislature
Answer:
D. the federal legislature
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP I NEED THIS BY TONIGHT!!!!
Task: Students should read the Overview - Rule of Law from the USCourts.gov website and then choose one of the rule of law case summary decisions found in the websites below. Students should state what case they researched and discuss whether or not they agreed with the court decision and provide their reasons.
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/express-unpopular-views-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/participate-judicial-process-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/exercise-religious-practices-rule-law
https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/access-education-rule-law
The case that was researched would have to be the case of Snyder v. Phelps. That is the case that is in the first link.
What is the general overview of this case?This case was about a church group who due to the fact that they have become in disagreement with some of the happenings in the United States, staged a picketing that would directly affect one of the members of the group they had issues with.
The court decision that was made here is disagreed with because I believe that even though the people have their first amendment rights, they would still have to be sensitive to other groups in the society.
If they had these issues I believe that it would have been better they took it up directly with the government instead of having to show their insensitivity to a person that was in mourning right on the day they were burying their dead.
The right to privacy of this family was breached by the church group on this day that the picketing was done.
Read more on the rule of law here:
https://brainly.com/question/1266084
#SPJ1
Which of the following is something you should not concern yourself with when making an ethical decision? O Is it legal? Is it cost effective? O Is it beneficial? Could my family and managers respect my decision?
Answer:
could my family and managers respect my decision
1. Alcohol plus affects short-term memory and tracking ability.
A. O marijuana
B. O antihistamines
C. O tranquilizers
Alcohol plus C. tranquilizers affects short-term memory and tracking ability.
What do tranquilizers do ?Tranquilizers are a type of medication that affects the central nervous system and can cause drowsiness, confusion, and impaired cognitive function. This can include a decrease in short-term memory and tracking ability, similar to the effects of alcohol.
Marijuana use can also impair short-term memory and tracking ability, so option A is incorrect.
Antihistamines are a type of medication used to treat allergies and cold symptoms, and while they can cause drowsiness, they typically do not have a significant impact on cognitive function. Therefore, option B is also incorrect.
Find out more on tranquilizers at https://brainly.com/question/12736097
#SPJ1
Describe the proper way to conduct a testimony
I am doing a follow up case on the Dadeville shooting in alabama. The suspects were charged with 4 counts of reckless murder. More charges will be filed. Going based off of the 4 counts what is the recommended sentencing based on alabama state law?
.
Some general factors that would influence sentencing recommendations include:
• The specifics of the charges (e.g. reckless murder vs. 1st degree murder) and the number of charges. More/lesser charges would impact sentencing.
• Alabama sentencing guidelines which provide ranges for different types of felonies based on offense levels. Reckless murder would likely fall into a higher offense level.
• The criminal history of the offenders. Prior criminal records could increase recommended sentences.
• Circumstances of the crime. Especially aggravating factors could warrant longer sentences.
• Discretion of the judge. Sentencing ultimately comes down to the judge's discretion within the applicable laws and guidelines.
Without knowing the details of the Dadeville shooting case, charges, criminal histories of the offenders, and judge's sentencing philosophy, I cannot determine precise recommended sentences for the 4 reckless murder charges. The sentences could range from many years to potentially life imprisonment, depending on the factors.
The best approach is to review the specific laws on reckless murder sentencing in Alabama, the guidelines, details of the charges and offenders in this case, and decisions in similar previous cases to help determine an appropriate recommendation range for each charge. But there are too many unknowns based on the information provided for me to give more precise recommendations. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
The federal government can order states
to pass laws is
False
True
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The government can not order states to pass a law
what is mapp v ohio case about
If you were given a speeding violation and told to report to court for a hearing, who would MOST likely be listening to your case?
A. a jury of your peers
B. a Supreme Court justice
C. a Justice of the Peace
D. a Federal Magistrate
How many people are responsible for the final decision in the problem-solving process?
A). up to three
B). two
C). one
D). no more than four
Answer:
D
Explanation:
no more than four is the answer
Which concept is central to the idea of due process in the United States?
- Defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
-Prosecutors prove guilt with a preponderance of evidence.
-Witnesses are required to testify against themselves.
-Citizens must provide their own legal representation.
The concept that is central to the idea of due process in the United States is that Defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The Option A is correct.
What is Due process?Generally, a due process of law is an application of all legal rules and principles pertaining to the case so that all legal rights that are owed to the person are respected.
The due process helps to balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following due process of the law, this constitutes a due process violation which offends the rule of law.
Read more about due process
brainly.com/question/711394
#SPJ1
im 13 should i have a phone
Answer:yes
Explanation:it is important to stay connected
A government promoting the involvement of Allman government emerged in what country
Answer:
the city-state of Athens
Explanation:
1. The First Amendment to the U.S Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." What part of the Amendment is relevant to this case?
Congress shall not enact any law respecting or prohibiting the free exercise of religion; or restricting the press or speech rights; or the right of the people to peacefully gather and file a grievances petition with the government.
What is stated in the First Amendment?The First Amendment says that Congress can't pass a law that respects a religious establishment or makes it illegal to practice it freely. Speech, assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress are all protected by this law.
What was the First Amendment's original purpose?In conclusion, the founders believed that the First Amendment guaranteed more specific legal rules that had long protected expressive freedom while also requiring Congress to restrict speech and the press only in order to promote the public good.
Learn more about First Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/9194486
#SPJ1
Which foreign policy goals is most important to the us and why
Answer:
It is difficult to pinpoint one single foreign policy goal that is most important to the United States, as there are a number of important objectives that the U.S. seeks to achieve through its foreign policy. However, some key foreign policy goals that have been emphasized by U.S. policymakers and analysts include:
National security: Ensuring the safety and security of the United States and its citizens is one of the primary goals of U.S. foreign policy. This includes protecting against threats such as terrorism, nuclear proliferation, cyber attacks, and other forms of aggression from state and non-state actors.
Economic prosperity: The U.S. has long prioritized economic growth and prosperity as a core foreign policy objective, seeking to promote free trade, investment, and economic development around the world to benefit American businesses and consumers.
Promoting democracy and human rights: The U.S. has a long history of advocating for democratic values and human rights, and promoting democratic governance, civil liberties, and freedom of expression is often seen as an important part of U.S. foreign policy.
Protecting the environment: The U.S. has increasingly recognized the importance of protecting the environment and addressing climate change, and has sought to promote global cooperation and action on this issue through multilateral agreements and other means.
Overall, these foreign policy goals are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, and the importance of each may shift depending on the circumstances and priorities of the U.S. government at any given time. Ultimately, the U.S. seeks to promote stability, prosperity, and security both at home and around the world, and its foreign policy goals are designed to advance these broader objectives.
Explanation:
Describe how political differences between the major parties affect the nomination and
confirmation of justice
Answer:
Possible Changes to the Confirmation Process · by I Shapiro · Cited by 1 — Historically, the Senate has confirmed fewer than 60 percent of Supreme Court nominees under divided.
Explanation:
What is one way supporters show that they favor a candidate?
HELP
RESOURCES
RECORDS
When you are driving in bad weather or bad road conditions, you should
Use the same following distance that you use in good conditions.
Use one and a half times the following distance that you use in good conditions.
Use two times the following distance that you use in good conditions.
According to the research, the correct option is "use two times the following distance that you use in good conditions".
How to drive in bad weather or bad road conditions?According to the traffic rules, it is recommended to respect the safety distance when driving on the road, especially in winter as there is less visibility and less grip.
It is essential to have a safe distance since bad weather does not allow you to see the road properly, so it is also convenient to drive at a moderate speed.
Therefore, we can conclude that according to the research, the correct option is "use two times the following distance that you use in good conditions".
Learn more about driving in bad weather rules here: https://brainly.com/question/14893886
#SPJ1