which of the following is not one of the five elements used by businesses to raise security in a firm?

In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.

"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.

However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.

Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050

#SPJ11

The form of cannabis mainly found in Northern Europe and parts of Asia is Cannabis Sativa.

The form of cannabis mainly found in Northern Europe and parts of Asia is Cannabis Sativa.

Cannabis Sativa is a species of the Cannabis plant that is known for its tall stature, narrow leaves, and typically higher levels of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) compared to other cannabis species. In these regions, Cannabis Sativa has a long history of cultivation and use, often for industrial purposes such as fiber production.

It has been traditionally grown for its strong and durable fibers, which are used in textiles, ropes, and other industrial applications. In terms of psychoactive properties, Cannabis Sativa is known for its uplifting and energizing effects.

This variety of cannabis is adapted to colder climates and has thrived in regions such as Northern Europe and parts of Asia where the climate and environmental conditions are suitable for its growth.

For more such question on cannabis

https://brainly.com/question/15725358

#SPJ11

Answer:

chemical

Explanation:

Answer:

v

Explanation:

h

The verdict in favor of the Cherokee people was given by Chief Justice John Marshall of the Supreme Court. Major Ridge, a well-known Cherokee politician, served as the leader of this purported "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation.

John Ross, the senior Cherokee chief, led the majority of the Cherokees who rejected relocating. For approximately forty years, John Ross led the Cherokee People as their chief, and it was during this time that the tribe went through some of its most difficult circumstances.

His primary role during the bitter factional struggle over the decision to settle in Indian Territory in the 1830s is what made him most famous (Oklahoma). The US Supreme Court ruled the Cherokee Nation to be sovereign in Georgia.

Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390

#SPJ4

The term “Rule of Law” is derived from the French phrase 'La Principe de Legality' (the principle of legality) which refers to a government based on principles of law and not of men. [1] In a broader sense Rule of Law means that Law is supreme and is above every individual.

Answer:

I don't know if I can help in any way I can get a ride to the train station and sweet dreams my love I love you too baby girl and I will be there at the same time I don't have a great day and sweet dreams my love I love you too baby girl and I will be there at the same time

Answer:

this is a law order given the owner a standing order to forbid others from using the mark in a way that will lessen the beauty or priority.

The statement is accurate. A functional democracy depends on positions like county tax assessor and justice of the peace.

An assessor, sometimes known as a tax assessor, is a hired or elected representative tasked with figuring out the value of each taxable property in a county, municipality, or township in the United States.

Tax revenue is essential for governments to function. Real estate, personal property, and income are assessed for taxes by the federal, state, and local governments.

To know more about Justice visit:-

brainly.com/question/978006

#SPJ4

Answer:

You are the legal advisor of a big advertising company, Clooney Ideas. They have a lot of clients and every month you get various Television Commercials (TVCs) ideas from the art director and concept writers to analyze and give legal clearance. This month the following concepts / idea were presented to you:

Idea # 1 (Japan Chai)

The TVC will show a skinny (thin) person fighting a wrestling match (kushti) at a village in interior Punjab. He is foiled miserably by his opponent (a big pahalwan). The skinny person is then approached by his friend who says “Japan cha sumo wrestler ki pehchan!” The skinny person has the tea and then immediately becomes a big fat sumo wrestler (like Yokozuna). In the next round he thrashes his opponent and wins. He is hailed by everyone in the village. In the last scene the skinny person says “Tussi bhi piyo! Sumo wrestler na banay to Rs. 1000 inam!”

Idea # 2 (Awami insect killer)

A person (famous cricketer Zameer Akram) is shown being bitten by mosquitos. He goes to a doctor and tells him that for some reason mosquitos love him. The doctor (who is the famous hero Fahad Khan wearing a lab coat) says, “Hum nay Awami insect spray, dus (10) patients per kiya, or 100% positive result raha!” In the next scene Zameer Akram is shown playing a night cricket match and all mosquitoes near him are falling dead immediately, a batsman who is about to face him also runs for his life like a mosquito. In the end Zameer Akram is shown holding Awami insect killer and saying “Awami mein hai Awam ki power!”

You are separately told by the makers of Awami insect killer that the 100% success rate is based on lab conditions i.e. the patients were exposed to rare breed of mosquitos found in Africa only. The spray will have very little effect on mosquitos found in Pakistan.

Idea # 3 (Dosti chewing gum)

A group of 6 friends will be shown in the first scene who are sitting idle and getting bored in a university. All of a sudden one of the friends pops out a box of dosti chewing gum and gives it to all of them. After eating the chewing gum, all of them get energized, start to run around, three friends are shown flying in the sky with wings. One of them is riding a flying horse. Two of the friends are shown getting on a rocket and flying to space. In the last scene all friends shout collectively “Dosti chewing gum is so friendly!”

Idea 4 (Afridi whitening cream)

In the first scene, three African Americans are shown trying to give trials for the Chinese basketball team. However, due to their skin tone they are rejected despite having exceptional skills. They go home depressed.

In the next scene their Pakistani friend comes to their place and says “You can be as fair as me, apply Afridi whitening cream for 30 days, if you don’t become fair, you three can win a ticket to Hawaii”

The three basket players are then shown using the Afridi whitening cream and growing fairer each day. Eventually all three of them turn into famous, Pakistani actors. They appear for basketball trials again and are selected for the Chinese team.

At the end of the TVC a voice over says, “Afridi whitening cream, world’s number 1 whitening cream”

Q-1 Discuss the legal implication for each of the above ideas. In particular, which ideas (from a legal perspective) are the best and the worst?

Q-2 Please elaborate how will you change the ideas to cover the legal risks involved.

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

Answer:

The answer is True

Explanation:

Law and ethics are intercourses because they are both sciences and both help regulate people's behavior but from different types of perspectives

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

Good Luck!

Answer:

Explanation:

What is a summon/Where to find it?

Complete the form. The summons document in most courts has a preferred format. Contact the clerk's office if a form or example is not accessible on the court's website. The summons should be "issued." A summons isn't legitimate unless it's signed by the clerk of the court where you filed your complaint.

What do you need in your summon?

Identify who is being sued. You'll need the person, business, or other entity you've designated as a defendant in the lawsuit's entire legal name and address. Each person or entity you are suing must get a separate summons.

The five ways in which an Agency can be created are:

Express agreement: the parties enter into a formal agreement, either orally or in writing, outlining the terms of the agency relationship.

Implied agreement: the parties' conduct implies that one is acting as an agent for the other.

Apparent authority: the principal's actions or words lead a third party to believe that someone is acting as their agent, even if no agency relationship was intended.

Ratification: the principal retroactively approves an action taken by someone who was not originally acting as their agent.

Operation of law: an agency relationship is created by law, such as in the case of a parent and child.

i) Barter transactions involve the exchange of goods or services for other goods or services without the use of money, while gift transactions involve the voluntary transfer of property or assets without the expectation of receiving anything in return.

ii) Bailment involves the transfer of possession of personal property from one party (the bailor) to another party (the bailee) for a specific purpose, while barter transactions involve the exchange of goods or services for other goods or services without the use of money.

iii) Bailment involves the transfer of possession of personal property from one party (the bailor) to another party (the bailee) for a specific purpose, while gift transactions involve the voluntary transfer of property or assets without the expectation of receiving anything in return.

Learn more about agency on

https://brainly.com/question/26253714

#SPJ1

A Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) is a legally binding document that outlines the terms and conditions of a clinical trial between the sponsor and the participating institution or site. The CTA typically covers aspects such as the scope of the trial, responsibilities of each party, confidentiality and publication of results, indemnification, and financial arrangements.

A Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) is a legally binding contract between parties involved in a clinical trial, such as the sponsor, the investigator, and the study site. It outlines the responsibilities, rights, and obligations of each party, ensuring that the clinical trial is conducted ethically and in compliance with regulations. The agreement ensures that all parties involved understand their roles and responsibilities in the trial and comply with all applicable regulations and guidelines. A CTA also addresses issues such as confidentiality, data ownership, publication rights, and compensation. It is crucial for all parties to agree upon and adhere to the terms outlined in the CTA to maintain the integrity of the clinical trial and protect the rights of participants.

learn more about rights of participants here: brainly.com/question/3316963

#SPJ11

Answer:

A advantage

Explanation:

A majority of adults say that being white helps people’s ability to get ahead in the country at least a little (59%); 28% say being white neither helps nor hurts and 12% say it hurts.

Answer: Verdadero

Explanation:

En el año 338 a.C., el Emperador Caracalla pone fin a la institución de la esclavitud, eliminando la distinción entre hombres libres y esclavos. Este evento no solo aporta una mayor fuerza integradora al creciente imperio, sino que además permite una mayor recaudación de fondos a través de los impuestos que los esclavos liberados deben comenzar a pagar, y que genera un beneficio fiscal para el emperador.

Antes de eso, la esclavitud había sido una institución naturalizada en el Imperio Romano, existiendo personas que nacían como esclavos, y otras que obtenían esa condición por definiciones del derecho positivo de la época.

Answer:

The Commissioner of Financial Regulation is responsible for charting and supervising Maryland state-chartered banks, state-chartered credit unions, and state-chartered trust companies.

Explanation:

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population. 2. The Founding Fathers ultimately chose to extend the slave trade for another b. 20 years.

The three-fifths compromise was struck in 1787 by members of the Constitutional Convention. It called for the census of three-fifths of a state's enslaved population in order to determine the number of Representatives each state would have in Congress.

It also detailed the principles for allocating federal direct taxation and the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. In other words, states that legalized slavery could count 60% of their enslaved people, who were not citizens and could not vote, in determining the state's political representation in the national government.

The three-fifths agreement was part of a package of perks that included a twenty-year moratorium on any prohibition on slavery inserted into the Constitution to persuade people to vote.

To know more about Three-fifths Compromise:

https://brainly.com/question/27878011

#SPJ4

Correct question:

1. The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that _____.

a) for every five slaves, three would be counted towards population

b) for every three slaves, five would be counted toward population

c) for every five slave owners, three slaves could be added to the total state population

d) for every three slave owners, five slaves could be added to the total state population

2. The Founding Fathers considered banning slavery in the Constitution, but instead chose to extend the slave trade for _____ years.

a) 100

b) 20

c) 10

d) 50

The major implication of the types of differing political cultures that exist from country-to-country is that democratic countries might differ markedly in how they are governed based on differences in their political culture.

Hence, the correct option is C.

The political culture of a country refers to the set of beliefs, values, and attitudes that shape the political behavior of its citizens and leaders.

These cultural differences can have a significant impact on how a country is governed, particularly in democratic societies where political culture influences the development and functioning of democratic institutions.

For example, the political culture of the United States emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, which has led to a decentralized system of government with strong protections for individual liberty.

In contrast, the political culture of Japan emphasizes group harmony and consensus-building, which has led to a more centralized system of government with greater emphasis on collective responsibility.

Therefore, the major implication of differing political cultures is that democratic countries might differ markedly in how they are governed based on differences in their political culture.

This can affect the way democratic institutions are structured, the way leaders are selected, and the way policies are formulated and implemented.

To know more about democratic countries here:

https://brainly.com/question/18703567

#SPJ4

The decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards is the lexicographic decision rule.

Lexicographic decision rule is a type of decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards.

The decision rule is often used in situations where a company is seeking to make a decision among a number of options that are all acceptable, but which differ in terms of their performance levels on various evaluative criteria.

In the lexicographic decision rule, the decision maker sets a minimum standard for each criterion and selects the option that performs best on the most important criterion, without considering the performance levels of the other criteria.

If there is a tie, the decision maker moves to the second most important criterion and selects the option that performs best on that criterion, and so on, until a decision is made. This rule is also known as the priority rule or the lexicographic ordering rule.

To know more about lexicographic decision rule, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29839779#

#SPJ11

Answer:

i agree im abit of an artist

Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.

One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.

Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.

Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.

Answer:

The 5th amendment

Explanation:

The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process

Answer:

5th Amendment!

Answer:

Elements of pilgrim economy Colonial economy was trade situated (for example creation of money crops, mineral. It was shady in nature, that is Africans were profoundly taken advantage of. It went connected at the hip with estrangement of (Africans were distanced from their territory which was utilized by the Europeans).

Hope this helped! :D